Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy
A Registered Replication Report
Abstract
Abstract: Research has shown that people automatically imitate others and that this tendency is stronger when the other person is a human compared with a nonhuman agent. However, a controversial question is whether automatic imitation is also modulated by whether people believe the other person is a human. Although early research supported this hypothesis, not all studies reached the same conclusion and a recent meta-analysis found that there is currently neither evidence in favor nor against an influence of animacy beliefs on automatic imitation. One of the most prominent studies supporting such an influence is the study by Liepelt and Brass (2010), who found that automatic imitation was stronger when participants believed an ambiguous, gloved hand to be human, as opposed to wooden. In this registered report, we provide a high-powered replication of this study (N = 199). In contrast to Liepelt and Brass (2010), we did not find an effect of animacy beliefs on automatic imitation. However, we did find a correlation between automatic imitation and perceived self-other similarity. Together, these results suggest that the gloved hand procedure does not reliably influence automatic imitation, but interindividual differences in perceived similarity do.
References
2017). Sample-size planning for more accurate statistical power: A method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1547–1562. 10.1177/0956797617723724
(2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 3027–3031. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1019
(2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1–2), Article
(1–2 . 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143. 10.1006/brcg.2000.1225
(2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 489–495. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007
(2014). More than associations: An ideomotor perspective on mirror neurons. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(2), 195–196. 10.1017/S0140525X13002239
(2021). Dissociable effects of averted “gaze” on the priming of bodily representations and motor actions. Acta Psychologica, 212, Article
(03225 . 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.1032252010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1148–1167. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112
(2011). Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 409–421. 10.1037/a0019325
(2014). Mirror neurons: From origin to function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(02), 177–192. 10.1017/S0140525X13000903
(2018). Automatic Imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(5), 453–500. 10.1037/bul0000143
(2019). Reaction time indices of automatic imitation measure imitative response tendencies. Consciousness and Cognition, 68, 115–118. 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.001
(2022). Top-down social modulation of perception-action coupling. Acta Psychologica, 222, Article
(103481 . 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.1034812018). Automatic imitation of pro- and antisocial gestures: Is implicit social behavior censored? Cognition, 170C, 179–189. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019
(2024, February 4). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy: A Registered Replication Report [Data, Materials]. https://osf.io/v2wyu
(2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article
(81 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.007812016). Status and power do not modulate automatic imitation of intransitive hand movements. PLoS ONE, 11(4), Article
(4 . 10.1371/journal.pone.01518352021). A direct test of the similarity assumption—Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. Cognition, 215, Article
(104824 . 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.1048242017). Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(38), 10071–10076. 10.1073/pnas.1701916114
(2017). Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PLoS ONE, 12(9), 1–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784
(2022). Group membership does not modulate automatic imitation. Psychological Research, 86(3), 780–791. 10.1007/s00426-021-01526-1
(2016). Believe it or not: Moving non-biological stimuli believed to have human origin can be represented as human movement. Cognition, 146, 431–438. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.010
(2012). How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 76(4), 407–420. 10.1007/s00426-011-0389-5
(2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 463–483. 10.1037/a0022288
(2018). From automata to animate beings: The scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents: Socialness attribution and artificial agents. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1426(1), 93–110. 10.1111/nyas.13727
(2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
(2014). The Control of automatic imitation based on bottom-up and top-down cues to animacy: Insights from brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 2503–2513. 10.1162/jocn_a_00651
(2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. 10.1177/2515245918770963
(2010). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 221–227. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000028
(2010). When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition, 115(3), 426–434. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.003
(2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 578–591. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578
(2009). Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors. Experimental Brain Research, 192(4), 739–744. 10.1007/s00221-008-1649-5
(2022). Model expertise does not influence automatic imitation. Experimental Brain Research, 240(4), 1267–1277. 10.1007/s00221-022-06338-2
(2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article
. (aac4716 . 10.1126/science.aac47162020). Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(6), 481–524. 10.1037/bul0000229
(2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
(2011). Action observation and robotic agents: Learning and anthropomorphism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(6), 1410–1418. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.004
(2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 632–640. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.020
(2006). Bottom-up, not top-down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(8), 2415–2419. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05115.x
(2018). What are reaction time indices of automatic imitation measuring? Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 240–254. 10.17605/OSF.IO/N8XVQ
(2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 264–274. 10.1038/nrn2805
(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
(2021). Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(4), 746–759. 10.1177/1747021820986528
(2016). Pictures of you: Dot stimuli cause motor contagion in presence of a still human form. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 135–145. 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.004
(2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 915–926. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915
(2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. 10.1177/1745691616658637
(2016). When and why mimicry is facilitated and attenuated: Mimicry. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 561–574. 10.1111/spc3.12269
(2010). Seeing other minds: Attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 376–382. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.005
(2012). Social top-down response modulation (STORM): A model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article
(153 . 10.3389/fnhum.2012.001532011). Eye contact enhances mimicry of intransitive hand movements. Biology Letters, 7(1), Article
(1 . 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0279