Abstract
Abstract. This study investigated how individuals’ perceptions of features of online social interaction may foster communicative disinhibition that predicts problematic Internet use (PIU). The value that study participants placed on the unique features of computer-mediated communication (CMC; i.e., reduced nonverbal cues and enhanced message control) was associated with greater feelings of disinhibition, which in turn predicted higher levels of preference for online social interactions (POSI). POSI was found to be associated with negative outcomes due to Internet use. Variables accounted for 28% of the variance in participants’ online disinhibition, 27% of the variance in POSI, and 30% of the variance in the negative outcomes. The study represents a step toward a better understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying the link between CMC characteristics and PIU.
References
2012). The quality of online, offline, and mixed-mode friendships among users of a social networking site. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(3), article 6. doi: 10.5817/CP2012-3-6
(2000). Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 537–550. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400
(2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 377–383. doi: 10.1089/109493101300210286
(1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
(1993).
(Alternative ways of assessing model fit . In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.2002).
(Identity construction on the internet . In S. L. CalvertA. B. JordanR. R. CockingEds., Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development (pp. 57–70). Westport, CT: Praeger.2003). Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic Internet use and psycho-social well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648. doi: 10.1177/0093650203257842
(2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x
(2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012
(2013). Preference for online social interactions: direct and in direct effects of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 524–529. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.023
(2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17, 187–195. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8
(2012). Friendship 2.0 adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1527–1536. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.013
(1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(2012). Adolescent Internet addiction: testing the association between self-esteem, the perception of Internet attributes and preference for online social interactions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(6), 318–323. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0358
(2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(10), 761–766. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0429
(2012). Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1581–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.06.005
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2011). The disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37, 58–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
(1998).
(Causes and implications of disinhibited behaviour on the Net . In J. GackenbachEd., Psychology and the internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.36
(2007).
(Disinhibition and the Internet . In J. GackenbachEd., Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (2nd ed., pp. 75–92). Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.1993). LISREL8 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
(2006). LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
(1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
(2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computer in Human Behavior, 28, 434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014
(1998). A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT
(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
(2000). Incidents and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13–29. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7
(2009). Problematic Instant Messaging use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 627–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01456.x
(2005). Prevalence of pathological internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the general health questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 562–570. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.562
(1998). ‘Making MOOsic’: The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517–537. doi: 10.1177/0265407598154005
(2007). Precursors of adolescents’ use of visual and audio devices during online communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2473–2487. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.04.002
(2008). Personal homepage construction as an expression of social development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 496–506. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.496
(2007). Precursor and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” model. Media Psychology, 10, 292–315. doi: 10.1080/15213260701375686
(2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
(2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6, 1–22. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_1
(2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.
(2014). Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 821–826. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.022
(2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
(1996). Computer mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001
(2002).
(Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships . In M. L. KnappJ. A. DalyEds., Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2011). The mediator role of self-disclosure and moderator roles of gender and social anxiety in the relationship between Chinese adolescents’ online communication and their real-world social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2161–2168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.010
(1998). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1, 237–244. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
(