Skip to main content

Online Disinhibition

Precursors and Outcomes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000136

Abstract. This study investigated how individuals’ perceptions of features of online social interaction may foster communicative disinhibition that predicts problematic Internet use (PIU). The value that study participants placed on the unique features of computer-mediated communication (CMC; i.e., reduced nonverbal cues and enhanced message control) was associated with greater feelings of disinhibition, which in turn predicted higher levels of preference for online social interactions (POSI). POSI was found to be associated with negative outcomes due to Internet use. Variables accounted for 28% of the variance in participants’ online disinhibition, 27% of the variance in POSI, and 30% of the variance in the negative outcomes. The study represents a step toward a better understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying the link between CMC characteristics and PIU.

References

  • Anthenunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2012). The quality of online, offline, and mixed-mode friendships among users of a social networking site. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(3), article 6. doi: 10.5817/CP2012-3-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Armstrong, L., Phillips, J. G. & Saling, L. L. (2000). Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 537–550. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beard, K. W. & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 377–383. doi: 10.1089/109493101300210286 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Calvert, S. L. (2002). Identity construction on the internet. In S. L. CalvertA. B. JordanR. R. CockingEds., Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development (pp. 57–70). Westport, CT: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic Internet use and psycho-social well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648. doi: 10.1177/0093650203257842 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casale, S., Tella, L. & Fioravanti, G. (2013). Preference for online social interactions: direct and in direct effects of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 524–529. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.023 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17, 187–195. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0 adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1527–1536. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S. & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fioravanti, G., Dèttore, D. & Casale, S. (2012). Adolescent Internet addiction: testing the association between self-esteem, the perception of Internet attributes and preference for online social interactions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(6), 318–323. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0358 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fioravanti, G., Primi, C. & Casale, S. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(10), 761–766. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0429 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F. I. & Calvete, E. (2012). Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1581–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.06.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N. & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37, 58–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joinson, A. N. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behaviour on the Net. In J. GackenbachEd., Psychology and the internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.36 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joinson, A. N. (2007). Disinhibition and the Internet. In J. GackenbachEd., Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (2nd ed., pp. 75–92). Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL8 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lapidot-Lefler, N. & Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computer in Human Behavior, 28, 434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. & Hoffman, J. (1998). A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C., Hoffman, J., West, S. G. & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morahan-Martin, J. & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidents and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13–29. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neo, R. L. & Skoric, M. M. (2009). Problematic Instant Messaging use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 627–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01456.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Niemz, K., Griffiths, M. & Banyard, P. (2005). Prevalence of pathological internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the general health questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 562–570. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parks, M. R. & Roberts, L. D. (1998). ‘Making MOOsic’: The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517–537. doi: 10.1177/0265407598154005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M. & Schouten, A. (2007). Precursors of adolescents’ use of visual and audio devices during online communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2473–2487. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.04.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, K. L., Dayanim, S. & Matthias, S. (2008). Personal homepage construction as an expression of social development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 496–506. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.496 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2007). Precursor and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” model. Media Psychology, 10, 292–315. doi: 10.1080/15213260701375686 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stritzke, W. G. K., Nguyen, A. & Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6, 1–22. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taddei, S. & Contena, B. (2014). Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 821–826. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walther, J. B. & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. KnappJ. A. DalyEds., Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, J., Jackson, L. A. & Zhang, D. (2011). The mediator role of self-disclosure and moderator roles of gender and social anxiety in the relationship between Chinese adolescents’ online communication and their real-world social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2161–2168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, K. (1998). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1, 237–244. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar