Abstract
Abstract. Theory of mind, defined as attributing intentions, feelings, and thoughts to others, is a key capacity in building mental models of narratives. Shot scale, referring to the relative size of the figure on the screen, effectively regulates theory of mind relevant visual cues carried by faces. However, research into the effect of shot scale on theory of mind responses in a narrative is almost nonexistent. The aim of the present study was to investigate the extent to which shot scale influences theory of mind responding in film viewers. Four short animated movies were annotated for average shot scale and presented in a within-subject design. Employing mixed-method data collection, participants were asked to retell the story of the films and fill in questionnaires on narrative experience. Skin conductance was also measured during exposure. Story descriptions were content analyzed for theory of mind responses. In a Poisson regression model, average shot scale predicted theory of mind response indicating that increasing spatial proximity to the character triggered higher occurrence of mental state references in participants’ story descriptions. The findings elucidate how formal properties of character presentation affect an audience’s mental models of a story.
References
2010). Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 97–108. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21187
(2003). Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(2013). Bela Balazs: Early film theory: Visible man and the spirit of film. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
(2014). The effect of patient-centeredness and gender of professional role models on trainees’ mentalization responses. Implications for film-aided education. Patient Education and Counseling, 97, 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.005
(2014). The big picture: Effects of surround on immersion and size perception. Perception, 43, 1061–1070. doi: 10.1068/p7663
(2009). Moral dilemmas film task: A study of spontaneous narratives by individuals with autism spectrum conditions. Autism Research, 2(3), 148–156.
(2001). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2001). The reading the mind in the eyes test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 241–251. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715
(2009). Viewing angle matters – screen type does not. Journal of Communication, 59, 609–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01441.x
(2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(1), 80–91.
(2015). Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 423–429. doi: 10.1037/aca0000031
(2007). Ubornaya istoriya
((Lavatory Lovestory) [Motion picture] . Russia: Melnitsa Animation Studio.2013). Grammar of the shot. Boston, MA: Focal Press.
(1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.
(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. doi: 10.1080/15213260903287259
(2002). Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1129–1138.
(2011). Affective analysis on patterns of shot types in movies. Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), Conference Publications, 253–258.
(2013). Classifying cinematographic shot types. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 62, 51–73. doi: 10.1007/s11042-011-0916-9
(2013). The effects of facial close-ups and viewers’ sex on empathy and intentions to help people in need. Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 161–178.
(1993). Toward a theory of point-of-view editing: Communication, emotion, and the movies. Poetics Today, 14(1), 123–141.
(2013).
(Cognitivism, psychology, and neuroscience: Movies as attentional engines . In A. P. ShimamuraEd., Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 53–75). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2013). Reducing stigma and out‐group distinctions through perspective‐taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894–911.
(2007). Arousal and attention: Picture size and emotional reactions. Psychophysiology, 44, 680–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00545.x
(2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264.
(1995). Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: Investigating “theory of mind” in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 17(1), 5–13.
(2005). Infrahumanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 243–253. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271421
(2006). When does size not matter? Effects of stimulus size on affective modulation. Psychophysiology, 43(2), 207–215.
(2008). Fuzzy picture processing: Effects of size reduction and blurring on emotional processing. Emotion, 8, 352–363. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.352
(2010). Effects of picture size reduction and blurring on emotional engagement. PloS One, 5(10), e13399.
(2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100.
(2010).
(The influence of form and presentation attributes of media on emotion . In K. DovelingC. von ScheveE. A. KonijnEds., The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media (pp. 275–293). New York, NY: Routledge.1996). A bio‐informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 66–84.
(2013). Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: A new task for assessing theory of mind in adults. PLoS ONE, 8, e81279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081279
(2001). Father and Daughter [Motion picture]. The Netherlands: CinéTé Filmproductie BV.
(2006). Introducing MASC: A movie for the assessment of social cognition. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 623–636.
(2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 464–473. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x
(2010).
(Mind perception . In S. T. FiskeD. T. GilbertG. LindzeyEds., Handbook of social psychology (pp. 498–541). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.2007). Mentalizing and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Mental Health, 16(1), 83–101.
(2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 999–1010.
(2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.
(2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
(2003). Functional imaging of “theory of mind”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77–83. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6
(2006). The “Reading the Mind in Films” Task: Complex emotion recognition in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions. Social Neuroscience, 1, 111–123. doi: 10.1080/17470910600980986
(1969). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
(2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.
(2000). The Awkward Moments Test: A naturalistic measure of social understanding in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 225–236.
(2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091.
(2003). Eye remember you: The effects of gaze direction on face recognition in children and adults. Developmental Science, 6, 67–71. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00256
(2012). Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 617–623. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007
(2012). Perceiving in depth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2009). Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: The core of social cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 843–863. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.004
(2007). Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: Evidence from eye movement monitoring. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1019–1028.
(2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380.
(2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543–555. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.543
(2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
(2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8(4), 369–394.
(2013).
(Belief, desire, action, and other stuff: theory of mind in movies . In A. P. ShimamuraEd., Psychocinematics (pp. 244–266). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.
(1995). Direct responses to people on the screen: Television and personal space. Communication Research, 22, 288–324. doi: 10.1177/009365095022003002
(1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10(1), 95–106.
(2000). Presence and television. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75–98.
(2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.
(2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 103–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406
(2010). Mind-mindedness coding manual, Version 2.0 (Unpublished manuscript). Durham, UK: Durham University.
(2014). Is mind-mindedness trait-like or a quality of close relationships? Evidence from descriptions of significant others, famous people, and works of art. Cognition, 130(3), 417–427.
(2005). Taking an “intentional stance” on eye-gaze shifts: A functional neuroimaging study of social perception in children. NeuroImage, 27(1), 247–252.
(2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
(2008). The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses. Emotion, 8(2), 192.
(2007). Effects of “in-your-face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(04), 621–635.
(2003). Understanding cinema: A psychological theory of moving imagery. Cambridge and New York, MA: Cambridge University Press.
(1999).
(The scene of empathy and the human face on film . In C. R. PlantingaG. M. SmithEds., Passionate views: Film, cognition, and emotion (pp. 239–255). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.2014). Forking cinematic paths to the self: Neurocinematically informed model of empathy in motion pictures. Projections, 8(2), 89–114.
(1994).
(Designing experiments that assess psychological responses to media messages . In A. LangEd., Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 165–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1(1), 49–67.
(1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge and New York, MA: Cambridge University Press.
(1992). Film style and technology: History and analysis. London, UK: Starword.
(2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617–627.
(2010). Invention of Love [Motion picture]. Russia: HHG Film Company.
(1995). Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
(2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38, 402–418. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
(2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. NeuroImage, 29(1), 90–98.
(2013). Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a story. Scientific Study of Literature, 3, 137–153. doi: 10.1075/ssol.3.1.11wal
(2008). Lettin’go. [Motion picture]. France: Living Heart.
(1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
(