Why User Comments Affect the Perceived Quality of Journalistic Content

References

• Ash, E., Peeling, A. & Hettinga, K. (2010, August). Does content matter? The effects of type and number of user-generated comments on news stories, Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication National Conference, Denver, CO. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. ChaikenY. TropeEds., Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Coe, K., Kenski, K. & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967394 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Eveland, W. P. & Dunwoody, S. (2002). An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the Web versus Print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 34–53. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Fichter, C. & Jonas, K. (2008). Image effects of newspapers. Journal of Psychology, 216(4), 226–234. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.216.4.226 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Govier, T. (2010). A practical study of argument. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Hastie, R. & Pennington, N. (1989). Notes on the distinction between memory-based versus on-line judgments. In J. N. BassiliEd., On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Houston, J. B., Hansen, G. J. & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79–92. doi: 10.1177/1931243111407618 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Johnson, P. O. & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Kaltenhäuser, B. (2005). Abstimmung am Kiosk [Vote at the kiosk]. Wiesbaden, Germany: DUV. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kim, E.-M. & Sun, Y.-H. (2006). The effect of replies in Internet news on the audience. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 50, 33–64. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Koriat, A. & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 478–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Krei, A. (2014). Online-IVW im Juli [Online-IVW in July]. Retrieved from http://www.dwdl.de/zahlenzentrale/47078/wm_hilft_newssites_starkes_debuet_fuer_heftigco_/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Krueger, J. I. (2012). The (Ir)rationality project in social psychology. In J. I. KruegerEd., Frontiers of social psychology. Social judgment and decision making (pp. 59–75). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L. & Zivic, A. (2015). Discussing the news. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 850–870. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2014.972079 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kühne, R. (2012). Media-induced affects and opinion formation. Living Reviews in Democracy, 3, 1–20. Retrieved from https://www.lrd.ethz.ch/index.php/lrd/index First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. L. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–204). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Mayerl, J. (2013). Response latency measurement in surveys. Survey Methods: Insights From the Field. Retrieved from http://surveyinsights.org/?p=1063 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Meijer, I. C. (2013). Valuable journalism. journalism, 14(6), 754–770. doi: 10.1177/1464884912455899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Meltzer, K. (2014). Journalistic concern about uncivil political talk in digital news media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(1), 85–107. doi: 10.1177/1940161214558748 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Prochazka, F., Weber, P. & Schweiger, W. (2016). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161497 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Mico, J. L., Diaz-Noci, J., Masip, P. & Meso, K. (2011). Public shere 2.0? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463–487. doi: 10.1177/1940161211415849 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Sikorski, C. von. & Haenelt, M. (2016). Scandal 2.0. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1077699016628822 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Urban, J. & Schweiger, W. (2014). News quality from the recipients’ perspective. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 821–840. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.856670 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• van der Wurff, R. & Schoenbach, K. (2014). Civic and citizen demands of news media and journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 433–451. doi: 10.1177/1077699014538974 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Vujnovic, M. (2011). Participatory journalism in the marketplace. Economic motivations behind the practices. In J. B. SingerA. HermidaD. DomingoA. HeinonenS. PaulussenT. QuandtM. VujnovicEds., Participatory journalism. Guarding Open Gates at online newspapers (pp. 139–154). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Wallsten, K. & Tarsi, M. (2015). Persuasion from below? Journalism Practice. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2015.1102607 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T. & Archer, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 377–394. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941–957. doi: 10.1177/1461444813495165 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E. & Mayer, M. (2008). Not quite the average. ACM Transactions on the Web, 2(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1145/1326561.1326566 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar