Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

How Perceived Processing Fluency Influences the Illusion of Knowing in Learning From TV Reports

Published Online:December 19, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000250

Abstract

Abstract. The present two-study work aims to contribute to an understanding of the causes and consequences of perceived processing fluency. Regarding its causes, the experimental studies (N1 = 399; N2 = 337) found that features of television reports (e.g., footage used, background music) can heighten perceptions of processing fluency. Regarding its consequences, it was found that heightened perceived fluency biases metacognitive judgments. Specifically, considering perceived knowledge in relation to actual knowledge, recipients experiencing fluency have been found to overestimate their knowledge about the issue depicted in the experimental stimuli. The resulting illusion of knowing was particularly pronounced under conditions of low involvement, indicating that the so-called ease-of-processing heuristic underlies the effect.

References

  • Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9369–9372. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601071103 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 985–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.985 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N. & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brosius, H. B., Donsbach, W. & Birk, M. (1996). How do text-picture relations affect the informational effectiveness of television newscasts? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364343 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. UlemanJ. A. BarghEds., Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, A. J. (2015). Congruence-association model and experiments in film music: Toward interdisciplinary collaborations. Music and the Moving Image, 8, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.5406/musimoviimag.8.2.0005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Forster, M., Leder, H. & Ansorge, U. (2013). It felt fluent, and I liked it: Subjective feeling of fluency rather than objective fluency determines liking. Emotion, 13, 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Bush Hitchon, J., Gilligan, E., Kahlor, L., Gorham, B. W. & Serlin, R. C. (2002). What holds attention to television? Strategic inertia of looks at content boundaries. Communication Research, 29, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029001001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaye, B. K. & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the Web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L. & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornell, N., Rhodes, M. G., Castel, A. D. & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The ease-of-processing heuristic and the stability bias.Dissociation memory, memory beliefs, and memory judgments. Psychological Science, 22, 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407929 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kreitler, S., Zigler, E. & Kreitler, H. (1974). The complexity of complexity. Human Development, 17, 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271333 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. L. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–204). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, A. Y. & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205–218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L. & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers and Education, 52, 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mattheiß, T., Weinmann, C., Löb, C., Rauhe, K., Bartsch, K., Roth, F. S. & Vorderer, P. (2013). Political learning through entertainment – only an illusion? How motivations for watching TV political talk shows influence viewers’ experiences. Journal of Media Psychology, 25, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000100 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • McGlone, M. S. & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11(5), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neuwirth, K. (2000). Testing the spiral of silence model: The case of Mexico. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.2.138 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Park, C. Y. (2001). News media exposure and self-perceived knowledge: The illusion of knowing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.4.419 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1178 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. & Alter, A. L. (2013). Disfluency sleeper effect: Disfluency today promotes fluency tomorrow. In C. UnkelbachR. GreifenederEds., The experience of thinking. How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 85–97). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reber, R., Winkielman, P. & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ryffel, F. A. & Wirth, W. (2016). Heart versus mind: How affective and cognitive message frames change attitudes. Social Psychology, 47, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1027/18649335/a000257 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauerschatka, H. & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Unkelbach, C. & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In C. UnkelbachR. GreifenederEds., The experience of thinking. How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. MuschK. C. KlauerEds., The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wirth, W. (2013). Zur Rezeption von Infotainment: Informations- und Unterhaltungserleben als Konstituenten der Infotainment-Rezeption [On the reception of infotainment: Information and entertainment experiences as constituents of infotainment reception]. In M. DohleG. VoweEds., Politische Unterhaltung–Unterhaltende Politik: Forschung zu Medieninhalten, Medienrezeption und Medienwirkungen. Cologne, Germany: Halem, 57–93. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar