Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Valence-Based Biases in News Selection

Published Online:March 24, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000292

Abstract

Abstract. Recent work highlights individual-level variation in negativity biases in news selection. There has, however, been limited work exploring the source of this individual-level variation. This study considers predispositions in information processing as a source of difference in news selection. We explore individual differences in learning biases identified using Hot Rod, a new purpose-built online game. Asymmetries in respondents’ learning of negative and positive information in Hot Rod are correlated with news selection decisions. It thus appears that valence-based differences in news consumption are at least partly a function of the same biases that govern learning and information processing more broadly.

References

  • Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice, University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Axelrod, R., & Dawkins, R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation (revised edition). Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bachleda, S., Neuner, F. G., Soroka, S., Guggenheim, L., Fournier, P., & Naurin, E. (2020). Individual-level differences in negativity biases in news selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, Article 109675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109675 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiologiacal responses to threats. Nature Human Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press‐state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good, Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H., Eiser, J. R., & Shook, N. J. (2004). Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.293 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fournier, P., Soroka, S., & Nir, L. (2020). Negativity biases and political ideology: A comparative test across 17 countries. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gobet, F., Retschitzki, J., & de Voogt, A. (2004). Moves in mind: The psychology of board games, Taylor & Francis Group. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ke, F. (2011). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In F. KeEd., Gaming and simulations: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 1619–1665). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-195-9.ch701 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lamberson, P. J., & Soroka, S. (2018). A model of attentiveness to outlying news. Journal of Communication, 68, 942–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy040 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lange, P. A. M. V., Bekkers, R., Chirumbolo, A., & Leone, L. (2012). Are conservatives less likely to be prosocial than liberals? From games to ideology, political preferences and voting. European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.845 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lau, R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C., & Babbitt, P. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. The American Political Science Review, 93, 851–875. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586117 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, A. M. (2013). News audiences revisited: Theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.816712 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCombs, M., & Poindexter, P. (1983). The duty to keep informed: News exposure and civic obligation. Journal of Communication, 33, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02391.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., Hatemi, P. K., & Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rayburn, J. D. (1981). Gratification discrepancies and news program choice. Communication Research, 8(4), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028100800404 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Patterson, T. E. (1994). Out of order, Vintage Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pietri, E. S., Fazio, R. H., & Shook, N. J. (2012). Valence weighting as a predictor of emotional reactivity to a stressful situation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 746–777. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.7.746 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pietri, E. S., Fazio, R. H., & Shook, N. J. (2013). Weighting positive versus negative: The fundamental nature of valence asymmetry. Journal of Personality, 81, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00800.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878192233001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rocklage, M. D., & Fazio, R. H. (2014). Individual differences in valence weighting: When, how, and why they matter. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50(Supplement C), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rocklage, M. D., Pietri, E. S., & Fazio, R. H. (2017). The weighting of positive vs. negative valence and its impact on the formation of social relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73(Supplement C), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 995–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shook, N. J., Fazio, R. H., & Vasey, M. W. (2007). Negativity bias in attitude learning: A possible indicator of vulnerability to emotional disorders? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences, Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soroka, S., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2019a). Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 18888–18892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soroka, S., Fournier, P., Nir, L., & Hibbing, J. (2019b). Psychophysiology in the study of political communication: An expository study of individual-level variation in negativity biases. Political Communication, 36, 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000939 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vavreck, L., & Rivers, D. (2008). The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802305177 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar