Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Binge-Watching, Self-Determination, and Well-Being

A Partially Successful Direct Replication and Extension of Granow et al. (2018)

Published Online:March 01, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000334

Abstract

Abstract. Binge-watching is a highly relevant new media phenomenon. An increasing number of people watch multiple episodes of their favorite series online, a process often spanning several hours. Granow et al. (2018) showed that binge-watching is accompanied by both positive as well as negative psychological experiences. Because it is one of the most important studies on the topic, we conducted a direct replication of Granow et al. (2018). We also extended the original study by including additional variables derived from self-determination theory. We conducted an online questionnaire with 668 respondents. Results showed that we could not reproduce the exact model that was reported. We also needed to adapt several of the originally tested measures to achieve satisfactory model fit. After introducing these changes, results showed that we replicated 67% of all effects in terms of significance (i.e., originally significant effects were also significant in the replication, and vice versa). When looking at effect size (i.e., originally reported effects fell into the replication’s 95% confidence interval), we replicated 42%. Our study represents a partial replication of Granow et al. (2018). In our extension, we found two further positive links between binge-watching and well-being: Binge-watching was associated not only with greater autonomy, but also with increased feelings of competence and relatedness. Competence and relatedness were related to increased well-being, which included vitality, recovery experience, and media enjoyment. In line with Granow et al. (2018), we found that binge-watching is related to self-determined media use and improved psychological well-being.

References

  • Austin, P. C., & Hux, J. E. (2002). A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36(1), 194–195. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.125015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Birch, J. (2019, June 3). How binge-watching is hazardous to your health. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/how-binge-watching-is-hazardous-to-your-health/2019/05/31/03b0d70a-8220-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Feijter, D., Khan, V.-J., & van Gisbergen, M. (2016). Confessions of a “guilty” couch potato, understanding and using context to optimize binge-watching behavior. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (pp. 59–67). https://doi.org/10.1145/2932206.2932216 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … de Vreese, C. (2020). An agenda for Open Science in communication. Journal of Communication, Article jqz052. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erdmann, E., & Dienlin, T. (2021). Online Supplementary Material for “Binge-watching, self-determination, and well-being: A partially successful direct replication and extension of Granow et al. (2018)”. https://osf.io/6k5rg/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Flayelle, M., Maurage, P., Di Lorenzo, K. R., Vögele, C., Gainsbury, S. M., & Billieux, J. (2020). Binge-watching: What do we know so far? A first systematic review of the evidence. Current Addiction Reports, 7(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-020-00299-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Granow, V. C., Reinecke, L., & Ziegele, M. (2018). Binge-watching and psychological well-being: Media use between lack of control and perceived autonomy. Communication Research Reports, 35(5), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1525347 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Groshek, J., Krongard, S., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Netflix and ill? Emotional and health implications of binge watching streaming TV. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society, 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217932 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jenner, M. (2017). Binge-watching: Video-on-demand, quality TV and mainstreaming fandom. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915606485 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keating, D. M., & Totzkay, D. (2019). We do publish (conceptual) replications (sometimes): Publication trends in communication science, 2007–2016. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1632218 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, W., & Beisch, N. (2020). Erneut starke Zuwächse bei Onlinevideo [Online video use continues to rise]. Media Perspektiven, 9, 482–500. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lemenager, T., Neissner, M., Koopmann, A., Reinhard, I., Georgiadou, E., Müller, A., Kiefer, F., & Hillemacher, T. (2020). COVID-19 lockdown restrictions and online media consumption in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meier, A., Reinecke, L., & Meltzer, C. E. (2016). “Facebocrastination”? Predictors of using Facebook for procrastination and its effects on students’ well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Merton, R. K. (1974). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Almenberg, A. D., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline, M., Nuijten, M. B., Rohrer, J. M., Romero, F., Scheel, A. M., Scherer, L., Schönbrodt, F., & Vazire, S. (2021). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ksfvq First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Panda, S., & Pandey, S. C. (2017). Binge watching and college students: Motivations and outcomes. Young Consumers, 18(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2017-00707 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2018). The emergence of contextual social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218756033 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rains, S. A., Levine, T. R., & Weber, R. (2018). Sixty years of quantitative communication research summarized: Lessons from 149 meta-analyses. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1446350 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reinecke, L. (2012). Mediennutzung und Well-Being: Zum positiven Wirkungspotenzial interaktiver und nicht interaktiver Unterhaltungsmedien [Media use and well-being: The potential of positive effects of interactive and non-interactive entertainment formats]. In L. ReineckeS. TrepteEds., Unterhaltung in neuen Medien. Perspektiven zur Rezeption und Wirkung von Online-Medien und interaktiven Unterhaltungsformaten (pp. 308–325). Herbert von Halem Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reinecke, L., & Eden, A. (2017). Media use and recreation: Media-induced recovery as a link between media exposure and well-being. In L. ReineckeM. B. OliverEds., The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 106–117). Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Riddle, K., Peebles, A., Davis, C., Xu, F., & Schroeder, E. (2018). The addictive potential of television binge watching: Comparing intentional and unintentional binges. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000167 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 24(2), 251524591774562. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rohrer, J. M., Hünermund, P., Arslan, R. C., & Elson, M. (2021). That’s a lot to PROCESS! Pitfalls of Popular Path Models. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/paeb7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/paper First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubenking, B., & Bracken, C. C. (2018). Binge-watching: A suspenseful, emotional, habit. Communication Research Reports, 35(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1525346 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubenking, B., Bracken, C. C., Sandoval, J., & Rister, A. (2018). Defining new viewing behaviours: What makes and motivates TV binge-watching? International Journal of Digital Television, 9(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdtv.9.1.69_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shim, H., & Kim, K. J. (2018). An exploration of the motivations for binge-watching and the role of individual differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiner, E., & Xu, K. (2020). Binge-watching motivates change: Uses and gratifications of streaming video viewers challenge traditional TV research. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750365 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., David Bowman, N., Reinecke, L., Lewis, R. J., & Eden, A. (2011). Media enjoyment as need satisfaction: The contribution of hedonic and nonhedonic needs. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01593.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thayer, R. E. (1990). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vaterlaus, J. M., Spruance, L. A., Frantz, K., & Kruger, J. S. (2019). College student television binge watching: Conceptualization, gratifications, and perceived consequences. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.10.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar