Theorizing Prejudice Reduction via Mediated Intergroup Contact
Extending the Intergroup Contact Theory to Media Contexts
Abstract
Abstract. The current paper describes an effort to develop an integrated theory – integrated mediated intergroup contact (IMIC) model – to account for the two types of mediated intergroup contact (parasocial and vicarious) that have been shown to help with prejudice reduction. To this end, our model applies concepts from intergroup contact theory, parasocial and vicarious research, and narrative transportation theory. The present research expands our theoretical understanding of how entertainment media can function as a tool for reducing prejudice toward various outgroups. The IMIC model accounts for the effects of the two types of mediated contact – parasocial and vicarious – and delineates the process of prejudice reduction.
References
2018). Attitudes toward Muslims: A test of the parasocial contact hypothesis and contact theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47(4), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2018.1443968
(2021, April 13). The impact COVID-19 had on the entertainment industry in 2020. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate/2021/04/13/the-impact-covid-19-had-on-the-entertainment-industry-in-2020/?sh=113df10f250f
(1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
(2017).
(Intergroup communication: Media influence on . In C. HoffnerEd., International encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–13). Wiley & Sons.2020). Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice. Human Communication Research, 46, 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa004
(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman & Co.
(2002).
(Social cognitive theory of mass communication . In J. BryantD. ZillmanEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.2009).
(Social cognitive theory of mass communication . In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 94–124). Routledge.2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
(2013). Priming effects of a reconciliation radio drama on historical perspective-taking in the aftermath of mass violence in Rwanda. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.011
(2021). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219900632
(2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59, 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485
(2013). A process evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based childhood obesity prevention intervention: The comics for health program. Health Promotion Practice, 14, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912437790
(1984).
(Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation . In N. MillerM. B. BrewerEds., Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Academic Press.1988).
(Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In P. KatzD. TaylorEds., Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 315–326). Plenum.2005).
(An integrative theory of intergroup contact . In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-52020 May 27). Coronavirus: What attacks on Asians reveal about American identity. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52714804
(2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
(2006).
(Audience identification with media characters . In J. BryantP. VordererEds., Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–187). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.2009).
(Mediated relationships and media effects: Parasocial interaction and identification . In R. L. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 223–226). SAGE Publications.2013). Influence of value disposition, interpersonal contact, and mediated exposure on public attitudes toward homosexuals in Singapore. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12006
(2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
(1972). Communication and social environment. Scientific American, 227, 253–260.
(1997). Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Tests of a model in four West European nations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01126.x
(2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61, 1104–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
(2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 29, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
(2012).
(Intergroup contact and communication . In H. GilesEd., The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 189–202). Routledge.2016). Harmonious contact: Stories about intergroup musical collaboration improve intergroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66, 937–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12261
(1988). Lovers wear rose colored glasses. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 5, 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758800500203
(1986).
(Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’ . In M. HewstoneR. BrownEds., Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Blackwell.2015). Portrayal of mental illness on the TV series Monk: Presumed influence and consequences of exposure. Health Communication, 30, 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.917840
(1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
(2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62, 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x
(2021). Personal narratives to improve attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A parallel-serial mediation model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211052511
(2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.08joh
(2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41, 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
(2020).
(Social cognitive theory . In M. B. OliverA. A. RaneyJ. BryantEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th ed., pp. 100–114). Routledge.2019). Mediated vicarious contact with transgender people: How narrative perspective and interaction depiction influence intergroup attitudes, transportation, and elevation. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 3, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v3.i1.p141
(2013). Self-efficacy, information-processing strategies, and acquisition of health knowledge. Asian Journal of Communication, 23, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.725175
(2021). Meeting the (trans)parent: Test of parasocial contact with transgender characters on reducing stigma toward transgender people. Communication Studies, 72(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1876125
(2009).
(Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping . In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 325–341). Lawrence Erlbaum.2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390533
(2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
(2018). Reducing prejudice through narratives: An examination of the mechanisms of vicarious intergroup contact. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(4), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000249
(2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
(2018). Entertainment-education effectively reduces prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216682350
(2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487
(2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication & Society, 15, 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
(1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
(2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
(2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counter-stereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38, 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384854
(1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01130.x
(2013). Arabs as terrorists: Effects of stereotypes within violent contexts on attitudes, perceptions, and affect. Psychology of Violence, 3, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030038
(2016). Reliance on direct and mediated contact and public policies supporting outgroup harm. Journal of Communication, 66, 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12234
(2021). Dynamic contact effects: Individuals’ positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000374
(2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544
(2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_02
(2008). The PSI-Process scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025
(2012). Direct and mediated intercultural contact: Koreans’ attitudes toward US Americans. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2012.670715
(2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00262.x
(2018). Mediated contact with gay men as a predictor of modern homonegativity: An analysis of exposure to characters appearing on television between 2000 and 2015. Communication Reports, 31, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1360374
(2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
(2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
(1974). Archi Bunker’s bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24(1), 36–47.
(2017). Direct, extended, and mass mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12423
(2017). “I’m Demi and I have bipolar disorder”: Effect of parasocial contact on reducing stigma toward people with bipolar disorder. Communication Studies, 68, 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1331928
(2020). Stereotypes in the face of reality: Intergroup contact inconsistent with group stereotypes changes attitudes more than stereotype-consistent contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220946816
(