Skip to main content
Theoretical Article

Theorizing Prejudice Reduction via Mediated Intergroup Contact

Extending the Intergroup Contact Theory to Media Contexts

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000338

Abstract. The current paper describes an effort to develop an integrated theory – integrated mediated intergroup contact (IMIC) model – to account for the two types of mediated intergroup contact (parasocial and vicarious) that have been shown to help with prejudice reduction. To this end, our model applies concepts from intergroup contact theory, parasocial and vicarious research, and narrative transportation theory. The present research expands our theoretical understanding of how entertainment media can function as a tool for reducing prejudice toward various outgroups. The IMIC model accounts for the effects of the two types of mediated contact – parasocial and vicarious – and delineates the process of prejudice reduction.

References

  • Abrams, J. R., McGaughey, K. J., & Haghighat, H. (2018). Attitudes toward Muslims: A test of the parasocial contact hypothesis and contact theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47(4), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2018.1443968 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Adgate, B. (2021, April 13). The impact COVID-19 had on the entertainment industry in 2020. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate/2021/04/13/the-impact-covid-19-had-on-the-entertainment-industry-in-2020/?sh=113df10f250f First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Atwell Seate, A. (2017). Intergroup communication: Media influence on. In C. HoffnerEd., International encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–13). Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., & Massey, Z. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice. Human Communication Research, 46, 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman & Co. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. BryantD. ZillmanEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 94–124). Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bilali, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2013). Priming effects of a reconciliation radio drama on historical perspective-taking in the aftermath of mass violence in Rwanda. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bond, B. J. (2021). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219900632 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bond, B. J., & Compton, B. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59, 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Branscum, P., Sharma, M., Wang, L. L., Wilson, B., & Rojas-Guyler, L. (2013). A process evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based childhood obesity prevention intervention: The comics for health program. Health Promotion Practice, 14, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912437790 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. MillerM. B. BrewerEds., Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In P. KatzD. TaylorEds., Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 315–326). Plenum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, H., Feng, Z., & Deng, B. (2020 May 27). Coronavirus: What attacks on Asians reveal about American identity. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52714804 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In J. BryantP. VordererEds., Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–187). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (2009). Mediated relationships and media effects: Parasocial interaction and identification. In R. L. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 223–226). SAGE Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Detenber, B. H., Hoe, S. S., Neo, R. L., Malik, S., & Cenite, M. (2013). Influence of value disposition, interpersonal contact, and mediated exposure on public attitudes toward homosexuals in Singapore. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gerbner, G. (1972). Communication and social environment. Scientific American, 227, 253–260. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamberger, J., & Hewstone, M. (1997). Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Tests of a model in four West European nations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01126.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61, 1104–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harwood, J. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 29, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harwood, J., & Joyce, N. (2012). Intergroup contact and communication. In H. GilesEd., The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 189–202). Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harwood, J., Qadar, F., & Chen, C. (2016). Harmonious contact: Stories about intergroup musical collaboration improve intergroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66, 937–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1988). Lovers wear rose colored glasses. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 5, 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758800500203 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. In M. HewstoneR. BrownEds., Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffner, C. A., & Cohen, E. L. (2015). Portrayal of mental illness on the TV series Monk: Presumed influence and consequences of exposure. Health Communication, 30, 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.917840 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Igartua, J., & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62, 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Igartua, J., & Cachón-Ramón, D. (2021). Personal narratives to improve attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A parallel-serial mediation model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211052511 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D. R. (2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.08joh First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41, 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krcmar, M. (2020). Social cognitive theory. In M. B. OliverA. A. RaneyJ. BryantEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th ed., pp. 100–114). Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Li, M. (2019). Mediated vicarious contact with transgender people: How narrative perspective and interaction depiction influence intergroup attitudes, transportation, and elevation. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 3, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v3.i1.p141 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lo, V., Wei, R., & Su, H. (2013). Self-efficacy, information-processing strategies, and acquisition of health knowledge. Asian Journal of Communication, 23, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.725175 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Massey, Z. B., Wong, N. C. H., & Barbati, J. L. (2021). Meeting the (trans)parent: Test of parasocial contact with transgender characters on reducing stigma toward transgender people. Communication Studies, 72(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1876125 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mastro, D. (2009). Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping. In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 325–341). Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390533 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moyer-Gusé, E., Dale, K. R., & Ortiz, M. (2018). Reducing prejudice through narratives: An examination of the mechanisms of vicarious intergroup contact. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(4), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000249 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murrar, S., & Brauer, M. (2018). Entertainment-education effectively reduces prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216682350 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, S.-Y. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication & Society, 15, 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramasubramanian, S. (2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counter-stereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38, 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384854 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothbart, M., & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01130.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saleem, M., & Anderson, C. A. (2013). Arabs as terrorists: Effects of stereotypes within violent contexts on attitudes, perceptions, and affect. Psychology of Violence, 3, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030038 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saleem, M., Yang, G. S., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2016). Reliance on direct and mediated contact and public policies supporting outgroup harm. Journal of Communication, 66, 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12234 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schäfer, S. J., Simsek, M., Jaspers, E., Kros, M., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., … Christ, O. (2021). Dynamic contact effects: Individuals’ positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000374 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_02 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schramm, H., & Hartmann, T. (2008). The PSI-Process scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shim, C., Zhang, Y. B., & Harwood, J. (2012). Direct and mediated intercultural contact: Koreans’ attitudes toward US Americans. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2012.670715 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00262.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sink, A., & Mastro, D. (2018). Mediated contact with gay men as a predictor of modern homonegativity: An analysis of exposure to characters appearing on television between 2000 and 2015. Communication Reports, 31, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1360374 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vidmar, N., & Rokeach, M. (1974). Archi Bunker’s bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24(1), 36–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Visintin, E. P., Voci, A., Pagotto, L., & Hewstone, M. (2017). Direct, extended, and mass mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12423 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wong, N. C. H., Lookadoo, K. L., & Nisbett, G. S. (2017). “I’m Demi and I have bipolar disorder”: Effect of parasocial contact on reducing stigma toward people with bipolar disorder. Communication Studies, 68, 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1331928 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zingora, T., Vezzali, L., & Graf, S. (2020). Stereotypes in the face of reality: Intergroup contact inconsistent with group stereotypes changes attitudes more than stereotype-consistent contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220946816 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar