Skip to main content

Are You as Attractive on Social Media as You Think?

Asymmetrical Perception of Sharing Emotion on Facebook

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000409

Abstract: Oftentimes how people evaluate their own behaviors does not correspond with what others perceive, a phenomenon called actor–observer asymmetry. With an online experiment, this study examined whether people exhibit actor–observer asymmetrical perception of their social attractiveness when sharing emotions on Facebook. Actors (sharers) thought they would be perceived as more socially attractive than observers (message readers) reported. The degree of such perceptual gaps varied by the valence of shared emotion (positive vs. negative), but the communication channels (status updates vs. direct messages) through which the emotions were shared did not affect the perceptual asymmetry. Actors’ self-presentation concerns and self-esteem were associated with the degree of asymmetries. The results extend the actor–observer asymmetry research and advance the literature on the social sharing of emotion on social media.

References

  • Allik, J., Realo, A., Mottus, R., Borkenau, P., Kuppens, P., & Hřebíčková, M. (2010). How people see others is different from how people see themselves: A replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020963 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook: Public intimacy. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on Social Network Sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bazarova, N. N., Choi, Y. H., Sosik, S. V., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675297 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bazarova, N. N., Taft, J. G., Choi, Y. H., & Cosley, D. (2013). Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12456384 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • boyd, D. M. (2008). Facebook’s privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence, 14(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084416 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choi, M., & Toma, C. L. (2014). Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.026 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choi, M., & Toma, C. L. (2017). Social sharing with friends and family after romantic breakups. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(3), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000226 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Choi, Y. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple Social Network Sites. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12053 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research: Explicating affordances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiesler, C., Dye, M., Feuston, J. L., Hiruncharoenvate, C., Hutto, C. J., Morrison, S., Khanipour Roshan, P., Pavalanathan, U., Bruckman, A. S., De Choudhury, M., & Gilbert, E. (2017). What (or who) is public? Privacy settings and social media content sharing. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998223 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gromet, D. M., & Pronin, E. (2009). What were you worried about? Actors’ concerns about revealing fears and insecurities relative to observers’ reactions. Self and Identity, 8(4), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802299392 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 75–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, M., & Baumeister, R. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, H., & Qiu, L. (2012). Sharing emotion on Facebook: Network size, density, and individual motivation. CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2573–2578. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2223838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petronio, S., & Durham, W. T. (2015). Communication privacy management theory: Significance for interpersonal communication. In D. O. BraithwaiteP. SchrodtEds., Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 335–347). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pronin, E. (2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320(5880), 1177–1180. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154199 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pronin, E., Fleming, J. J., & Steffel, M. (2008). Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012710 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S. (2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rimé, B., Bouchat, P., Paquot, L., & Giglio, L. (2020). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures Package, 61(52), 18. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, L. (1987). The problem of construal in social inference and social psychology. In N. GrunbergR. E. NisbettJ. SingerEds., A distinctive approach to psychological research: The influence of Stanley Schachter (pp. 118–150). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 255–304). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60407-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Savitsky, K., Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.44 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Social comparison context: Self-enhancement versus self-improvement motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.499 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, J., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, J. K. (2020). Too much of a good thing? Examining the relationship between excessive positivity on social media and feelings of inauthenticity and disconnection. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(3), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, S. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2018). Social media and subjective well-being: A relational perspective. In Z. PapacharissiEd., A networked self and love (pp. 86–112). Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, S. H., & Choi, M. (2023, December 15). Are you as attractive on social media as you think? Asymmetrical perception of sharing emotion on Facebook [Data]. https://osf.io/6z4au First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Toma, C. L., & Carlson, C. L. (2015). How do Facebook users believe they come across in their profiles? A meta-perception approach to investigating Facebook self-presentation. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.990557 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Toma, C. L., Jiang, L. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2018). Lies in the eye of the beholder: Asymmetric beliefs about one’s own and others’ deceptiveness in mediated and face-to-face communication. Communication Research, 45(8), 1167–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216631094 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2012.713340 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Pouwels, J. L., Beyens, I., Driel, I. I., & van Keijsers, L. (2021). Adolescents’ social media experiences and their self-esteem: A person-specific susceptibility perspective. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000037 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vermeulen, A., Vandebosch, H., & Heirman, W. (2018). #Smiling, #venting, or both? Adolescents’ social sharing of emotions on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar