Are You as Attractive on Social Media as You Think?
Asymmetrical Perception of Sharing Emotion on Facebook
Abstract
Abstract: Oftentimes how people evaluate their own behaviors does not correspond with what others perceive, a phenomenon called actor–observer asymmetry. With an online experiment, this study examined whether people exhibit actor–observer asymmetrical perception of their social attractiveness when sharing emotions on Facebook. Actors (sharers) thought they would be perceived as more socially attractive than observers (message readers) reported. The degree of such perceptual gaps varied by the valence of shared emotion (positive vs. negative), but the communication channels (status updates vs. direct messages) through which the emotions were shared did not affect the perceptual asymmetry. Actors’ self-presentation concerns and self-esteem were associated with the degree of asymmetries. The results extend the actor–observer asymmetry research and advance the literature on the social sharing of emotion on social media.
References
2010). How people see others is different from how people see themselves: A replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020963
(1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
(1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x
(2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook: Public intimacy. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x
(2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on Social Network Sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106
(2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675297
(2013). Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12456384
(2008). Facebook’s privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence, 14(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084416
(2014). Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.026
(2017). Social sharing with friends and family after romantic breakups. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(3), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000226
(2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple Social Network Sites. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12053
(1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
(2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
(2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research: Explicating affordances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
(2017). What (or who) is public? Privacy settings and social media content sharing. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998223
(2009). What were you worried about? Actors’ concerns about revealing fears and insecurities relative to observers’ reactions. Self and Identity, 8(4), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802299392
(2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
(2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 75–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007
(2000).
(The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory . In M. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-92012). Sharing emotion on Facebook: Network size, density, and individual motivation. CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2573–2578. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2223838
(1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845
(2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
(2015).
(Communication privacy management theory: Significance for interpersonal communication . In D. O. BraithwaiteP. SchrodtEds., Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 335–347). Sage.2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320(5880), 1177–1180. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154199
(2008). Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012710
(2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
(2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030
(2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
(2020). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.024
(1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures Package, 61(52), 18.
(1987).
(The problem of construal in social inference and social psychology . In N. GrunbergR. E. NisbettJ. SingerEds., A distinctive approach to psychological research: The influence of Stanley Schachter (pp. 118–150). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
(1995).
(Psychological barriers to dispute resolution . In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 255–304). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60407-42001). Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.44
(2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-5
(1997). Social comparison context: Self-enhancement versus self-improvement motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.499
(2020). Too much of a good thing? Examining the relationship between excessive positivity on social media and feelings of inauthenticity and disconnection. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(3), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz010
(2018).
(Social media and subjective well-being: A relational perspective . In Z. PapacharissiEd., A networked self and love (pp. 86–112). Routledge.2023, December 15). Are you as attractive on social media as you think? Asymmetrical perception of sharing emotion on Facebook [Data]. https://osf.io/6z4au
(2015). How do Facebook users believe they come across in their profiles? A meta-perception approach to investigating Facebook self-presentation. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.990557
(2018). Lies in the eye of the beholder: Asymmetric beliefs about one’s own and others’ deceptiveness in mediated and face-to-face communication. Communication Research, 45(8), 1167–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216631094
(2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2012.713340
(2021). Adolescents’ social media experiences and their self-esteem: A person-specific susceptibility perspective. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000037
(2018). #Smiling, #venting, or both? Adolescents’ social sharing of emotions on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.022
(2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
(