Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

How Affective Polarization Deepens the Partisan Divide in US Cable News Use

Exploring the Mediating Role of Partisans’ Bias Blind Spots in Media Credibility Judgment

Published Online:February 21, 2024https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000414

Abstract

Abstract: Currently, not only are partisans’ feelings toward Democrats and Republicans sharply divided along party lines, but so too are their choices regarding news media. Regarding this polarization, most studies have considered partisans’ selective use of news outlets as a crucial factor in widening affective polarization. However, insufficient attention has been directed to the potential role of affective polarization in selective exposure. Accordingly, this study seeks to fill this gap by verifying the effect of affective polarization on selective exposure and examining a potential mechanism using two-wave panel data. Our findings demonstrate that the degree of affective polarization is positively related to partisan bias in the credibility judgment of pro-party and counter-party cable news channels. In turn, favorable in-group bias in the credibility judgment of cable news channels has a significant effect on selective exposure to cable news outlets, mediating the effect of individual-level affective polarization on selective exposure. Lastly, we discuss the theoretical implications of our findings.

References

  • Andsager, J. L., Bemker, V., Choi, H. L., & Torwel, V. (2006). Perceived similarity of exemplar traits and behavior: Effects on message evaluation. Communication Research, 33(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205283099 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Araujo, T., Wonneberger, A., Neijens, P., & de Vreese, C. (2017). How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of Internet use. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317337 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100123X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias: Taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207074733 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baum, M. A., & Gussin, P. (2008). In the eye of the beholder: How information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media. Quarterly Journal of political science, 3(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00007010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bethlehem, J., Cobben, F., & Schouten, B. (2011). Handbook of nonresponse in household surveys. Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization (No. w26669). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Castro-Schilo, L., & Grimm, K. J. (2018). Using residualized change versus difference scores for longitudinal research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517718387 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of communication, 58(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalton, R. J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130780 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S. S., Greenwood, C. J., Oldenhof, E., Toumbourou, J. W., & Youssef, G. J. (2017). Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Druckman, J., & Levy, J. (2021). Affective polarization in the American public. Northwestern Institute for Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379619.00030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erber, R., Wegner, D. M., & Therriault, N. (1996). On being cool and collected: mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.757 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33, 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson & Company. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Foddy, M., Platow, M. J., & Yamagishi, T. (2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20(4), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro-and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gastil, J., & Xenos, M. (2010). Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication, 60, 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01484.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gift, K., & Gift, T. (2015). Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Political Behavior, 37(3), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9314-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Selective exposure to cable news and immigration in the US: The relationship between FOX News, CNN, and attitudes toward Mexican immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732138 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Golan, G. J., Waddell, T. F., & Barnidge, M. (2021). Competing identity cues in the hostile media phenomenon: Source, nationalism, and perceived bias in news coverage of foreign affairs. Mass Communication and Society, 24(5), 676–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1884263 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gramlich, J. (2020). How Pew Research Center evaluated Americans’ trust in 30 news sources. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/24/qa-how-pew-research-center-evaluated-americans-trust-in-30-news-sources/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gunther, A. C. (2016). Hostile media perceptions. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc217 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gunther, A. C., McLaughlin, B., Gotlieb, M. R., & Wise, D. (2017). Who says what to whom: Content versus source in the hostile media effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harel, T. O., Jameson, J. K., & Maoz, I. (2020). The normalization of hatred: Identity, affective polarization, and dehumanization on Facebook in the context of intractable political conflict. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913983 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hartmann, T., & Tanis, M. (2013). Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: The role of intergroup identification and status. Journal of Communication, 63, 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., & Beam, M. A. (2019). Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1575255 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2004). Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(3), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100310 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jurkowitz, M., Mitchell, A., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2020). US media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. Pew Research Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kerstetter, D., & Cho, M. H. (2004). Prior knowledge, credibility and information search. Annals of Tourism research, 31(4), 961–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, Y. (2009). A study on the influence of television audiences’ evaluation of the channel brand equity toward news credibility, preference, and viewing intention. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 23(6), 87–125. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Y., & Hwang, H. (2019). When partisans see media coverage as hostile: The effect of uncivil online comments on hostile media effect. Media Psychology, 22(6), 845–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1554492 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771359 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). The selective exposure self- and affect-management (SESAM) model: Applications in the realms of race, politics, and health. Communication Research, 42, 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214539173 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2019). Partisan information sources and affective polarization: Panel analysis of the mediating role of anger and fear. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 767–783. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Earlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McFarlane, J. (2007). Strategies for successful recruitment and retention of abused women for longitudinal studies. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 28(8), 883–897. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P. J. KalfleischEd., Communication yearbook (Vol. 27, pp. 293–335). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021561313 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Montoya, A. K. (2019). Moderation analysis in two-instance repeated measures designs: Probing methods and multiple moderator models. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 61–82. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nelson-Field, K., & Riebe, E. (2011). The impact of media fragmentation on audience targeting: An empirical generalisation approach. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(01), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2010.484573 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nordbrandt, M. (2021). Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3392–3411. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Brochta, W. (2022). Perceptions of partisanship in local television news. Electronic News, 16(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431211072504 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1399 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perloff, R. M. (2015). A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Quintelier, E., & van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes exploring causality using panel data. Political Studies, 62(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12097 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reid, S. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. LaursenT. D. LittleN. A. CardEds., Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soroka, S. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., & Lindholm, T. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press on Demand. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J. (2017). Selective exposure theories. In K. KenskiK. H. JamiesonEds., The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 531–538). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.009_update_001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J., & Lee, J. K. (2013). Perceptions of cable news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 16(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.646449 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroud, N. J., Muddiman, A., & Lee, J. K. (2014). Seeing media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perceptions. Journal of Communication, 64, 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12110 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Teague, S., Youssef, G. J., Macdonald, J. A., Sciberras, E., Shatte, A., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Greenwood, C., McIntosh, J., Olsson, C. A., Hutchinson, D., & SEED Lifecourse Sciences Theme (2018). Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 188(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tsfati, Y., & Nir, L. (2017). Frames and reasoning: Two pathways from selective exposure to affective polarization. International Journal of Communication, 11, 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5793 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. TurnerM. A. HoggP. J. OakesS. D. ReicherM. S. WetherellEds., Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276488031003005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar