Mind or Machine?
Conversational Internet Search Moderates Search-Induced Cognitive Overconfidence
Abstract
Abstract: Searching for and accessing online information through search engines causes digital media users to become overconfident in their own knowledge – in a sense, to attribute online knowledge to themselves. If searching the internet via search engine leads people to conflate digital information as self-produced, what happens when features of our devices turn information search into an interpersonal situation? The proliferation of anthropomorphic technology underpinned by artificial intelligence (AI) may challenge the current view of search-induced cognitive overconfidence. In two experiments, we investigate how using digital agents to search for information moderates the misattribution of online information to one’s own memory. We find that, in contrast to using a search engine, using a digital agent to access online information does not lead to higher estimations of cognitive self-esteem (Experiment 1). Moreover, using a humanized digital agent may lead to lower cognitive self-esteem than using a non-humanized digital agent or thinking alone (Experiment 2). Whereas internet searches can make people overconfident in their cognitive abilities, accessing information through a conversational digital agent appears to clarify boundaries between internal and external knowledge.
References
2020). Study finds consumers are embracing voice services: Here’s how. Adobe Blog.
. (2018). The development of anthropomorphism in interaction: Intersubjectivity, imagination, and theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article
(2136 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.021362009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
(2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/671052
(2013).
(Large-scale personal assistant technology deployment: the siri experience . In F. BimbotC. CerisaraC. FougeronG. GravierL. LamelF. PellegrinoP. PerrierEds., Proceedings 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2013) (pp. 2028–2032). International Speech Communications Association. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2013-4812016). The cue-of-the-cloud effect: When reminders of online information availability increase purchase intentions and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0420
(1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150
(2017). “What can I help you with?” Infrequent users’ experiences of intelligent personal assistants. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 1–12).
(2015). Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000070
(2008). An assessment of wine knowledge amongst global consumers. In 4th International Conference of the Academy of Wine Business Research, Siena, 17–19 July, 2008,
(2020). Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 1, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5
(2019). Voices in and of the machine: Source orientation toward mobile virtual assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.009
(2023, November 30). Mind or Machine? Conversational Internet search moderates search-induced cognitive overconfidence [Data]. https://osf.io/sy95u
(2023). Search fluency mistaken for understanding: ease of information retrieval from the internet inflates internal knowledge confidence. Social Media Society, 9(3), 20563051231195547.
(2021). Putting the “Me” in endorsement: Understanding and conceptualizing dimensions of self-endorsement using intelligent personal assistants. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1506–1526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912197
(2016). Judging knowledge in the digital age: The role of external‐memory organization. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 1080–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3277
(2018). Blurring boundaries: Effects of device features on metacognitive evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.044
(2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.22
(2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1–2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667343
(2009, September). Media equation revisited: Do users show polite reactions towards an embodied agent? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5773, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04380-2_19
(2020). Watson assistant. https://www.ibm.com/products/watsonx-assistant
. (2004). Experience as a moderator of the media equation: the impact of flattery and praise. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.008
(1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1), 1–24.
(1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological review, 100(4), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609
(1989).
(Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness . In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137–173). Academic Press.2010). What triggers social responses to flattering computers? Experimental tests of anthropomorphism and mindlessness explanations. Communication Research, 37, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00386.x
(2003, April).
(Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction . In G. CocktonP. KorhonenEds., Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 5–10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (pp. 289–296). https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/conference/proceedings-of-the-acm-chi-2003-human-factors-in-computing-systems-conference1990). Retrieval processes underlying confidence in comprehension judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.223
(2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. MIT Press.
(2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.
(1994, April). Computers are social actors. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (72–78).
(2013). Extending cognition to external agents. Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.844056
(2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
(1990).
(Interacting with media: Para-social interaction and real interaction . In B. D. RubenL. A. LievrouwEds., Mediation, information, and communication: Information and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 125–181). Transaction.2002).
(Effects of processing fluency on estimates of probability and frequency . In P. SedlmeierT. BetschEds., ETC: Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 175–188). Oxford University Press.1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications.
(2010). “Your word is my command”: Google search by voice: A case study. In Advances in speech recognition (pp. 61–90). Springer.
(2013). Social cognition in the Internet age: Same as it ever was? Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.827079
(2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
(2016). Help me please: Robot politeness strategies for soliciting help from humans. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI ‘16 Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4945–4955). ACM.
(2015). Saving-enhanced memory: The benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychological Science, 26(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614559
(2000). Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27, 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027006001
(1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
(2013). One with the cloud: Why people mistake the Internet’s knowledge for their own. Harvard University.
(2021). People mistake the internet’s knowledge for their own. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(43), Article
(e2105061118 .2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
(1985).
(Cognitive interdependence in close relationships . In W. IckesEd., Compatible and incompatible relationships: Springer series in social psychology (pp. 253–276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_121993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
(