Conscientization of Social Cryptomnesia Reduces Hostile Sexism and Rejection of Feminists
Abstract
This paper develops a hypothesis concerning the conscientization of social cryptomnesia, claiming that it is possible to reduce the rejection of minorities by reminding the population that a certain value has been promoted by a certain minority. Participants (N = 93) first reported their attitudes toward women’s rights and feminist movements. They were then confronted with their higher appreciation of women’s rights over feminists (social cryptomnesia) and blamed for it (conscientization) in a more versus less threatening manner. Results indicated that conscientization can be effective not only in inducing a more positive attitude toward feminists, but also in decreasing hostile sexism when the threat is lower. Implications for minority influence research are discussed.
References
(2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.
(2003). Phenomenal characteristics of cryptomnesia. Memory, 11, 1–11.
(
in press ). Influence without credit: How successful minorities respond to “social cryptomnesia.” In , Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion. New York: Cambridge University Press.(2001). Social influence in social reality. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
(1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–136.
(1999). Mais qu’est-ce qu’elles veulent encore? [
What do the want more ]. Cités, 9, 9–12.(2002). Persuasive constraint and expert versus nonexpert influence in intention to quit smoking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 209–222.
(1970). Pedagogia do Oprimido [
Pedagogics of the oppressed ] (11th ed.). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
(2000). Collective guilt and shame as motivation for White support of Black programs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1790–1811.
(1949). Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
(2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.
(1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
(2003). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 313–330.
(2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 237–326.
(1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
(1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In , Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
(1985). Innovation and minority influence. In , Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1981). “Sleeper effect” et/ou effet minoritaire? Etude théorique et expérimentale de l’influence sociale à retardement [
Sleeper effect and/or minority effect? ]. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 1, 199–221.(2007). A study of minorities as victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 725–746.
(1984). Intergroup relations, identification and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 317–322.
(1989). L’effet de cryptomnésie sociale [
The social cryptomnesia effect ]. Bulletin Suisse des Psychologues, 7, 3–6.(1986). The differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.
(1994). The value of minority dissent. In , Minority Influence (pp. 3–15). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
(1989). Discrimination et conversion dans l’influence minoritaire [
Discrimination and conversion in minority influence ]. In , Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 2, pp. 47–66). Cousset: Delval.(1990). Minority influence, manifest discrimination and latent influence. In , Social identity theory (pp. 152–168). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
(1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In , Understanding group behavior. Vol.2: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 191–210). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1999). L’antifeminisme à la belle époque: une réthorique réactionnaire [
Belle époque anti-feminism: a reactionary rhetoric ]. In , Un siècle d’antiféminisme [A century of antifeminism ] (pp. 133–147). Paris: Fayard.(2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655–669.
(2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319–331.
(1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
(1999). What is a feminist? Evaluations and stereotypes in closed- and open-ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 591–605.
(2003). Guilt for social cryptomnesia moderates attitudes toward feminists. New Review of Social Psychology, 2, 16–20.
(2005). Women, women rights and feminist movements. Social Science Information, 44, 175–188.
