Skip to main content
Original Article

Audience-Tuning Effects on Memory

The Role of Audience Status in Sharing Reality

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.150

After tuning messages to their audience’s attitude, communicators’ subsequent memories for the topic are often biased toward their audience-congruent messages. In the context of personnel assessment in an organization, we examined the role of audience characteristics in this audience-tuning effect. Student communicators tuned their description of an employee to either an equal-status audience (a student temp) or a higher-status audience (a company board member). Audience-tuning occurred under both conditions, but a memory bias was found only in the equal-status condition. This audience-status effect was mediated by epistemic and relational trust in the audience. Apparently, the equal-status audience, while lacking domain-specific expertise, qualifies as a more trustworthy partner in creating a shared reality, which fulfills both epistemic and affiliative motives.

References

  • Adorno, T.W. , Frenkel-Brunswik, E. , Levinson, D.J., , Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aiken, L.S., , West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bardeleben, H. , Reimann, B.W., , Schmidt, P. (1989). AIDS und das Problem der Prävention – Fakten und Fiktionen [AIDS and the problem of prevention: Facts and fiction]. Journal für Sozialforschung, 29, 97–128. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, R.M., , Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R.F., , Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M.B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M.B. Brewer, B.E. Collins, (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345–359). New York: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M.B., , Brown, R.J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey, (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 554–594). New York: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chiu, C.Y. , Krauss, R.M., , Lau, I.Y.-M. (1998). Some cognitive consequences of communication. In S.R. Fussell, R. Kreuz, (Eds.), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 259–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, H.H., , Marshall, C.E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.K. Joshi, B. Webber, I. Sag, (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, H.H., , Murphy, G.L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J.F. Le, Ny & W. Kintsch, (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287–296). New York: Elsevier. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Collani, G. (2006). Eine deutsche Skala zum Konstrukt “Bedürfnis nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit (NFCC)/Persönliches Strukturbedürfnis (PNS)” [A German scale for the construct “Need for cognitive closure/personal need for structure”]. In A. Glöckner-Rist, (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente [ZUMA information system: Electronic handbook of data collection methods in the social sciences] (Version 10.0). Mannheim, Germany: ZUMA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cooley, C.H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published 1902). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A.H., , Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A.H. , Wood, W., , Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424–435. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Echterhoff, G. , Higgins, E.T., , Groll, S. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257–276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Echterhoff, G. , Higgins, E.T., , Levine, J.M. (in press). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Echterhoff, G. , Kopietz, R. , Higgins, E.T., , Groll, S. (2008). How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 3–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S.T. (2003). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • French, J.R.P., , Raven, B.H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright, (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fussell, S.R., , Krauss, R.M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203–219. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hardin, C.D., , Conley, T.D. (2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In G.B. Moskowitz, (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hardin, C.D., , Higgins, E.T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R.M. Sorrentino, E.T. Higgins, (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T. (1981). The “communication game”: Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E.T. Higgins, C.P. Herman, M.P. Zanna, (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 343–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T. (1992). Achieving “shared reality” in the communication game: A social action that creates meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 107–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T. (1999). “Saying is believing” effects: When sharing reality about something biases knowledge and evaluations. In L.L. Thompson, J.M. Levine, D.M. Messick, (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 33–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T. , Echterhoff, G. , Crespillo, R., , Kopietz, R. (2007). Effects of communication on social knowledge: Sharing reality with individual vs. group audiences. Japanese Psychological Research, 49, 89–99. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T., , McCann, C.D. (1984). Social encoding and subsequent attitudes, impressions, and memory: “Context-driven” and motivational aspects of processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 26–39. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T., , Rholes, W.S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 363–378. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirst, W., , Echterhoff, G. (2008). Creating shared memories in conversation: Toward a psychology of collective memory. Social Research, 75, 183–216. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hogg, M.A., , Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M.A. Hogg, D. Abrams, (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173–190). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hogg, M.A., , Reid, S.A. (2001). Social identity, leadership, and power. In A.Y. Lee-Chai, J.A. Bargh, (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 159–180). Philadelphia: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hovland, C.I. , Janis, I.L., , Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J.T. , Ledgerwood, A., , Hardin, C.D. (2007). Shared reality, system verification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, retrieved January 10, 2008 from www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1751–9004.2007.00056.x. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kelley, H.H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krauss, R.M., , Fussell, S.R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others’ knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9, 2–24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A.W. , Pierro, A. , Mannetti, L., , De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84–100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A.W. , Raviv, A. , Bar-Tal, D. , Raviv, A. , Ellis, S. , Bar, R. et al. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In M.P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 346–392). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A.W. , Webster, D.M., , Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861–876. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, F., , Tiedens, L.Z. (2001). Is it lonely at the top? The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 43–91. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levine, J.M., , Higgins, E.T. (2001). Shared reality and social influence in groups and organizations. In F. Butera, G. Mugny, (Eds.), Social influence in social reality: Promoting individual and social change (pp. 33–52). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manis, M. , Cornell, S.D., , Moore, J.C. (1974). Transmission of attitude-relevant information through a communication chain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 81–94. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCann, C.D., , Higgins, E.T. (1992). Personal and contextual factors in communication: A review of the “communication game.” In G.R. Semin, K. Fiedler, (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 144–171). London: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pasupathi, M. , Stallworth, L.M., , Murdoch, K. (1998). How what we tell becomes what we know: Listener effects on speaker’s long-term memory for events. Discourse Processes, 26, 1–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R.E. , Cacioppo, J.T., , Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K.J., , Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roccas, S., , Brewer, M.B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Brothers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sidanius, J., , Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural models. In S. Leinhardt, (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Todorov, A. (2002). Communication effects on memory and judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 531–546. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar