Abstract
The effects of culture on impression formation are widely documented but poorly understood. Priming independent and interdependent self-construals, and focusing on particular stages of impression formation, could help remedy this because such self-construals differ across cultures. In three experiments, participants’ were primed with independent or interdependent self-construals before they formed spontaneous or intentional impressions of others. In Experiment 1, lexical decision reaction times showed that both traits and situational properties were activated spontaneously, but were unaffected by self-construal priming. In Experiment 2, a false-recognition paradigm showed that spontaneous trait inferences were bound to relevant actors’ faces, again regardless of self-construal priming. In Experiment 3, explicit ratings did show priming effects. Those primed with independent (but not interdependent) self-construal inferred traits more strongly than situational properties. Primed self-construals appear to affect intentional but not spontaneous stages of impression formation. The differences between effects of primed and chronic self-construals are discussed.
References
(1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47–63.
(1997). Individual differences in the spontaneous construal of behavior: Idiocentrism and the automatization of the trait inference process. Social Cognition, 15, 217–241.
(1999). “I” value freedom but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321–326.
(1998). Ordinary personology. In , The handbook of social psychology, Vol.II (4th ed., pp. 89–150). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
(2003). Smart and easy: Co-occurring activation of spontaneous trait inferences and spontaneous situational inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 434–447.
(2001). Toward a paradigm shift: From cross-cultural differences in social cognition to social-cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19, 181–196.
(2001). Culture and the process of person perception: Evidence for automaticity among East Asians in correcting for situational influences on behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1344–1356.
(1990). Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situational attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 239–249.
(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
(2010). Culture, attribution and automaticity: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 292–306. doi 101093/SCAN/nsq034
(1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971.
(2011). Spontaneous trait inference is culture specific: Behavioral and neural evidence. Psychological Science, 22, 1025–1032.
(1991). Why are traits inferred spontaneously? A developmental approach. Social Cognition, 9, 221–253.
(1993). How individualists interpret behavior: Idiocentrism and spontaneous trait inference. Social Cognition, 11, 243–269.
(2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.
(1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.
(
2006 ). Trait inference norms for over 100 potential trait implying sentences. Unpublished raw data.(2009). Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1088–1097.
(1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.
(2011). The automatic and co-occurring activation of multiple social inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 37–49.
(2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors: Evidence from false recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1051–1065.
(1999). Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. In , Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 141–160). New York: Guilford.
(1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 211–279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329–360.
(1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237–252.
(2001). Effects of culture and processing goals on the activation and binding of trait concepts. Social Cognition, 19, 295–323.
