Skip to main content
Original Article

How Dyads Reminiscence Moderates the Relations Between Familiarity, Trust, and Memory Conformity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000222

We examined memory conformity about an experience among dyads. Specifically, we tested the extent to which interpersonal familiarity and trust among dyads predicted their memory conformity to each other, and the extent to which the reminiscence mode (verbal discussion vs. nonverbal revision) moderated these relations. Participants (N = 100) in pairs (dyads = 50) either discussed verbally (discussion dyads = 25) or exchanged their written details nonverbally (revision dyads = 25) about a novel, shared experience in the laboratory. Discussing a new, shared event with a partner (vs. comparing each other’s written testimonies) predicted corrective memory conformity (personal memory improvement) and distortive memory conformity (personal memory errors). The data did not support an alternative model. Results thus suggest that familiarity and trust predict memory conformity, corrective and distortive, but only when people directly discuss their memories about an experience. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the two social psychological variables familiarity and trust in the context of memory conformity.

References

  • Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–211. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350090303 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodner, G. E., Musch, E., & Azad, T. (2009). Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1069–1076. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1069 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, A. D., Coman, A., & Hirst, W. (2009). The role of narratorship and expertise in social remembering. Social Psychology, 40, 119–129. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.119 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33, 770–782. doi: 10.3758/BF03193073 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleming, J. H., & Darley, J. M. (1991). Mixed messages: The multiple audience problem and strategic communication. Social Cognition, 9, 25–46. doi: 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.25 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K. (2008). You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. Memory, 16, 262–273. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801491 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533–543. doi: 10.1002/acp.885 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215–227. doi: 10.1348/1355325041719428 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480–485. doi: 10.3758/BF03193873 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gould, O., Kurzman, D., & Dixon, R. A. (1994). Communication during prose recall conversations by young and old dyads. Discourse Processes, 17, 149–165. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544863 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification made the subjective objective. In R. M. SorentinoE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of motiviation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour, (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Sutton, J., Barnier, A. J., & McIlwain, D. L. F. (2011). We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48, 267–303. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2010.541854 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 55–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, H. G., Granhag, P. A., Kwong See, S. T., & Loftus, E. F. (2001). Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions. Memory & Cognition, 29, 394–404. doi: 10.3758/BF03196390 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hope, L., Ost, J., Gabbert, F., Healey, S., & Lenton, E. (2008). “With a little help from my friends”: The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica, 127, 476–484. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howe, M. L. (2011). The adaptive nature of memory and its illusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 312–315. doi: 10.1177/0963721411416571 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johansson, O., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2000). Do elderly couples have a better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121–133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<121::AID-ACP626>3.0.CO;2-A First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johansson, O., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2005). Compensating strategies in collaborative remembering in very old couples. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 349–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00465.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. C. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306–1317. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1306 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kopietz, R., Hellmann, J. H., Higgins, E. T., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Shared-reality effects on memory: Communicating to fulfill epistemic needs. Social Cognition, 28, 353–378. doi: 10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Larzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 595–604. doi: 10.2307/351903 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ledgerwood, A., & Trope, Y. (2011). Local and global evaluations: Attitudes as self regulatory guides for near and distant responding. In K. D. VohsR. F. BaumeisterEds., Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (2nd ed.). (pp. 226–243). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. III (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995–1009. doi: 10.3758/BF03194318 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meegan, S. P., & Berg, C. A. (2002). Contexts, functions, forms, and processes of collaborative everyday problem solving in older adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 6–15. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000283 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mehrabian, A. (1968). Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 26–30. doi: 10.1037/h0026384 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (1999). Eyewitness testimony and the Oklahoma bombing. The Psychologist, 12, 292–295. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neuschatz, J. S., Lawson, D. S., Fairless, A. H., Powers, R. A., Neuschatz, J. S., Goodsell, C. A., & Toglia, M. P. (2007). The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and retrospective eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 231–247. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9047-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083–1099. doi: 10.1002/acp.1261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulos, E., & Goodman, E. (2003). The familiar stranger: Anxiety, comfort, and play in public places. Proc. SIG CHI Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 269–286). New York, NY: ACM Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ritchie, T. D., Skowronski, J. J., Walker, W. R., & Wood, S. E. (2006). Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Perceptions of memory detail and perceptions of accessibility. Memory, 14, 471–485. doi: 10.1080/09658210500478434 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roediger, H. L., Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). The social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365–371. doi: 10.3758/BF03196174 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1467.1967.tb01454 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Saczynski, J. S., Margrett, J. A., & Willis, S. L. (2004). Older adults’ strategic behavior: Effects of individual versus collaborative cognitive training. Educational Gerontology, 30, 587–610. doi: 10.1080/03601270490466985 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2004). Effects of post identification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334–346. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.334 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skagerberg, E. M. (2007). Co-witness feedback in line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 489–497. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skagerberg, E. M., & Wright, D. B. (2009). Susceptibility to post-identification feedback is affected by source credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 506–523. doi: 10.1002/acp.1470 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skowronski, J. J., Gibbons, J. A., Vogl, R. J., & Walker, W. R. (2004). The effects of social disclosure on the affective intensity provoked by autobiographical memories. Self and Identity, 3, 285–309. doi: 10.1080/13576500444000065 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stinnett, N., & Walters, J. (1977). Relationships in marriage and family. New York, NY: Macmillan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading post-event information. Memory & Cognition, 14, 329–338. doi: 10.3758/BF03202511 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189–202. doi: 10.1348/000712600161781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934–945. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar