Skip to main content
Original Article

Do I Shoot Faster Because I Am Thinking about an Outgroup or a Threatening Outgroup?

Shooter Bias, Perceived Threat, and Intergroup Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000255

Abstract. This research examines if aggressive responses through a shooter bias are systematically generated by priming outgroups or if a threat stereotypically associated with the primed outgroup is required. First, a pilot study identified outgroups stereotypically associated and not associated with threat. Afterwards, the main study included a manipulation of target group accessibility – ingroup versus nonthreatening outgroup versus threatening outgroup. Following exposure to primes of the group categories, the participants in all conditions played a shooter game in which the targets were males and females with ambiguous ethnicity and religion. Results demonstrated that while only priming of an outgroup stereotypically associated with threat elicits aggressive responses, priming of both nonthreatening and threatening outgroups leads to an increase in the ability to distinguish between stimuli compared to ingroup priming. These effects are discussed in terms of priming effects, dimensions of threat, and possible interpretations of this ability increase.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A., Chen, M. & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berkowitz, L. (1964). Aggressive cues in aggressive behavior and hostility catharsis. Psychological Review, 71, 104–122. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00126 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. (2007). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Social categorization, ingroup bias, and outgroup prejudice. In A. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 695–715). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cesario, J., Plaks, S., Hagiwara, N., Navarrete, C. D. & Higgins, T. (2010). The ecology of automaticity: How situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1311–1317. doi: 10.1177/0956797610378685 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of social information processing goals: Nonconscious priming reproduces effects of explicit conscious instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, M. & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Non conscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541–560. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M. & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M. & Wittenbrink, B. (2007). The influence of stereotypes on decisions to shoot. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1102–1117. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.450 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S. & Keesee, T. (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006–1023. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., Judd, C. M. & Goyle, A. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with secondary threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Devine, P. G. & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150. doi: 10.1177/01461672952111002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J. & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ford, T. E. (1997). Effects of stereotypical television portrayals of African-Americans on person perception. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 266–278. doi: 10.2307/2787086 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (2011). Accessibility theory. In P. A. M. Van LangeA. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 75–96). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S. & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, B. G. (2006a). DirectRT (Version 2006.2.40) [Computer software], New York, NY: Empirisoft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, B. G. (2006b). Medialab (Version 2006.2.0.16) [Computer software], New York, NY: Empirisoft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F. & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). Effect of social category priming on personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 14, 315–319. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14451 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mc Gregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L. & Pyszczynski, T. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview-threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590–605. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.590 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahajan, N., Martinez, M. A., Gutierrez, N. L., Diesendruck, G., Banaji, M. R. & Santos, L. R. (2011). The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 387–405. doi: 10.1037/a0022459 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahajan, N. & Wynn, K. (2012). Origins of “Us” versus “Them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others. Cognition, 124, 227–233. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mange, J., Chun, W. Y., Sharvit, K. & Belanger, J. J. (2012). Thinking about Arabs and Muslims makes Americans shoot faster: Effects of category accessibility on aggressive responses in a shooter paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 552–556. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1883 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, S. L., Zielaskowski, K. & Plant, E. A. (2012). The basis of shooter biases: Beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1358–1366. doi: 10.1177/0146167212450516 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muller, D., Bushman, B. J., Subra, B. & Ceaux, E. (2012). Are people more aggressive when they are worse off or better off than others? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 754–759. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plant, E. A., Goplen, J. & Kuntsman, J. W. (2011). Selective responses to threat: The role of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1274–1281. doi: 10.1177/0146167211408617 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W. & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sadler, M. S., Correll, J., Park, B. & Judd, C. M. (2012). The world is not black and white: Racial bias in the decision to shoot in a multiethnic context. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 286–313. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, K. & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Implicit (and explicit) racial attitudes barely changed during Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and early presidency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 308–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sim, J. J., Correll, J. & Sadler, M. S. (2013). Understanding police and expert performance when training attenuates (vs. exacerbates) stereotypic bias in the decision to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 291–304. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snodgrass, J. G. & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stanislaw, H. & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A. & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409–426. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. OskampEd., Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (pp. 23–45). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Martínez, C., Schwarzwald, J. & Tur-Kaspa, M. (1998). Prejudice towards immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 559–576. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Struch, N. & Schwartz, S. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Unkelbach, C., Forgas, J. P. & Denson, T. F. (2008). The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1409–1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Velasco González, K., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J. & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar