Do I Shoot Faster Because I Am Thinking about an Outgroup or a Threatening Outgroup?
Shooter Bias, Perceived Threat, and Intergroup Processes
Abstract
Abstract. This research examines if aggressive responses through a shooter bias are systematically generated by priming outgroups or if a threat stereotypically associated with the primed outgroup is required. First, a pilot study identified outgroups stereotypically associated and not associated with threat. Afterwards, the main study included a manipulation of target group accessibility – ingroup versus nonthreatening outgroup versus threatening outgroup. Following exposure to primes of the group categories, the participants in all conditions played a shooter game in which the targets were males and females with ambiguous ethnicity and religion. Results demonstrated that while only priming of an outgroup stereotypically associated with threat elicits aggressive responses, priming of both nonthreatening and threatening outgroups leads to an increase in the ability to distinguish between stimuli compared to ingroup priming. These effects are discussed in terms of priming effects, dimensions of threat, and possible interpretations of this ability increase.
References
1954/1979). The nature of prejudice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
(1964). Aggressive cues in aggressive behavior and hostility catharsis. Psychological Review, 71, 104–122.
(1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00126
(2007).
(The social psychology of intergroup relations: Social categorization, ingroup bias, and outgroup prejudice . In A. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 695–715). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2010). The ecology of automaticity: How situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1311–1317. doi: 10.1177/0956797610378685
(1996). Automatic activation of social information processing goals: Nonconscious priming reproduces effects of explicit conscious instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.464
(1997). Non conscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541–560.
(2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
(2007). The influence of stereotypes on decisions to shoot. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1102–1117. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.450
(2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006–1023. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006
(2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with secondary threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017
(1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
(1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150. doi: 10.1177/01461672952111002
(2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876.
(1997). Effects of stereotypical television portrayals of African-Americans on person perception. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 266–278. doi: 10.2307/2787086
(2011).
(Accessibility theory . In P. A. M. Van LangeA. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 75–96). London, UK: Sage.1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.
(2006a). DirectRT (Version 2006.2.40) [Computer software], New York, NY: Empirisoft.
(2006b). Medialab (Version 2006.2.0.16) [Computer software], New York, NY: Empirisoft.
(2003). Effect of social category priming on personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 14, 315–319. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14451
(1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview-threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590–605. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.590
(2011). The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 387–405. doi: 10.1037/a0022459
(2012). Origins of “Us” versus “Them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others. Cognition, 124, 227–233.
(2012). Thinking about Arabs and Muslims makes Americans shoot faster: Effects of category accessibility on aggressive responses in a shooter paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 552–556. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1883
(2012). The basis of shooter biases: Beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1358–1366. doi: 10.1177/0146167212450516
(2012). Are people more aggressive when they are worse off or better off than others? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 754–759.
(2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181.
(2011). Selective responses to threat: The role of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1274–1281. doi: 10.1177/0146167211408617
(2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.
(2012). The world is not black and white: Racial bias in the decision to shoot in a multiethnic context. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 286–313.
(2010). Implicit (and explicit) racial attitudes barely changed during Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and early presidency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 308–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.003
(2013). Understanding police and expert performance when training attenuates (vs. exacerbates) stereotypic bias in the decision to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 291–304.
(1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
(1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
(2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.
(1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409–426.
(2000).
(An integrated threat theory of prejudice . In S. OskampEd., Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (pp. 23–45). London, UK: Routledge.1998). Prejudice towards immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 559–576.
(1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373.
(2008). The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1409–1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.003
(2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685.
(