Skip to main content
Original Article

Need for Cognitive Closure and Political Ideology

Predicting Pro-Environmental Preferences and Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000333

Abstract. Little is known about epistemic motivations affecting political ideology when people make environmental decisions. In two studies, we examined the key role that political ideology played in the relationship between need for cognitive closure (NCC) and self-reported eco-friendly behavior. Study 1: 279 participants completed the NCC, pro-environmental, and political ideology measures. Mediation analyses showed that NCC was related to less pro-environmental behavior through more right-wing political ideology. Study 2: We replicated these results with a nonstudent sample (n = 240) and both social and economic conservatism as mediators. The results of Study 2 showed that social conservatism mediated the relationship between NCC and pro-environmental behavior. Finally, NCC was associated with pro-environmental attitude through both social and economic conservatism.

References

  • Allen, R. S., Castano, E. & Allen, P. D. (2007). Conservatism and concern for the environment. Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 30, 1–25. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bamberg, S. & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barbaro, N., Pickett, S. M. & Parkhill, M. R. (2015). Environmental attitudes mediate the link between need for cognition and pro-environmental goal choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.032 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, G. D. & Stern, P. C. (2005). Decision making for the environment: Social and behavioral science research priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brizi, A., Mannetti, L. & Kruglanski, A. W. (2016). The closing of open minds: Need for closure moderates the impact of uncertainty salience on outgroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12131 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T. & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D. & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carrus, G., Panno, A. & Leone, L. (in press). The moderating role of interest in politics on the relations between conservative political orientation and denial of climate change. Society & Natural Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A. & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chirumbolo, A., Brizi, A., Mastandrea, S. & Mannetti, L. (2014). “Beauty is no quality in things themselves”: Epistemic motivation affects implicit preferences for art. PLoS one, 9, e110323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110323 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clayton, S. & Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cottrell, S. P. (2003). Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters. Environment and Behavior, 35, 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503035003003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L. & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1376 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dhont, K., Roets, A. & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dietz, T., Stern, P. C. & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunlap, R. E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7, 428–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657500700402 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunlap, R. E. & McCright, A. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunlap, R. E. & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013–1028. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C. & McCright, A. M. (2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000580 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Federico, C. M., Ergun, D. & Hunt, C. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517273 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forgas, J. P. & Jolliffe, C. D. (1994). How conservative are greenies? Environmental attitudes, conservatism, and traditional morality among university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539408259486 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gamba, R. J. & Oskamp, S. (1994). Factors influencing community residents’ participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26, 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916594265001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hatemi, P. K., Funk, C. L., Medland, S. E., Maes, H. M., Silberg, J. L., Martin, N. G. & Eaves, L. J. (2009). Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. Journal of Politics, 71, 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090938 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffarth, M. R. & Hodson, G. (2016). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howell, S. E. & Laska, S. B. (1992). The changing face of the environmental coalition: A research note. Environment and Behavior, 24, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592241006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jennings, M. K. & Markus, G. B. (1984). Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study. American Political Science Review, 78, 1000–1018. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955804 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L. & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71, 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090719 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P. & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavioral. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan, S. & Berman, M. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595501 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.395 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of the closed mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and” freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ksiazkiewicz, A., Ludeke, S. & Krueger, R. (2016). The Role of cognitive style in the link between genes and political ideology. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12318 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Markowitz, E. M., Goldberg, L. R., Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebícková, M., Avia, M. D., … Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.173 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 100–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mercado-Doménech, S. J., Carrus, G., Terán-Álvarez-Del-Rey, A. & Pirchio, S. (2017). Valuation theory: An environmental, developmental and evolutionary psychological approach. Implications for the field of environmental education. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 16, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2017-016-merc First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L. & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L., Richter, I., Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Fischer, R. (2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490805 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumayer, E. (2004). The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 51, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nisbet, E. C., Hart, P. S., Myers, T. & Ellithorpe, M. (2013). Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63, 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12040 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A. & Cornelis, I. (2011). The closed mind: “Experience” and “cognition” aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right-wing attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 25, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.775 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Panno, A., Carrus, G., Maricchiolo, F. & Mannetti, L. (2015). Cognitive reappraisal and pro-environmental behavior: The role of global climate change perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2162 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Panno, A., Giacomantonio, M., Carrus, G., Maricchiolo, F., Pirchio, S. & Mannetti, L. (2018). Mindfulness, pro-environmental behavior, and belief in climate change: The mediating role of social dominance. Environment and Behavior, Advance on line publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517718887 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pierro, A. & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Revised need for cognitive closure scale, Unpublished manuscript, Università di Roma, “La Sapienza”, Italy, Rome. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A. & Hong, Y. Y. (2015). Chapter four-the motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.01.2015.01.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roets, A. & Van Hiel, A. (2008). Why some hate to dilly-dally and others do not: The arousal-invoking capacity of decision-making for low-and high-scoring need for closure individuals. Social Cognition, 26, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.333 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roets, A. & Van Hiel, A. (2011a). Allport’s prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424894 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roets, A. & Van Hiel, A. (2011b). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sabbagh, C. (2005). Environmentalism, right-wing extremism, and social justice beliefs among East German adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000095 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W. & Kaiser, F. G. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In S. ClaytonEd., The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556–580). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sears, D. O. & Funk, C. L. (1999). Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults’ political predispositions. Journal of Politics, 61, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647773 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B. & Borsuk, M. E. (2010). Pro-environmental behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05163.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Unanue, W., Vignoles, V. L., Dittmar, H. & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Life goals predict environmental behavior: Cross-cultural and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.02.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hiel, A. & Mervielde, I. (2002). The effects of ambiguity and need for closure on the acquisition of information. Social Cognition, 20, 380–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.5.380.21124 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Liere, K. D. & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it's measured? Environment and Behavior, 13, 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zia, A. & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509357871 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar