Need for Cognitive Closure and Political Ideology
Predicting Pro-Environmental Preferences and Behavior
Abstract
Abstract. Little is known about epistemic motivations affecting political ideology when people make environmental decisions. In two studies, we examined the key role that political ideology played in the relationship between need for cognitive closure (NCC) and self-reported eco-friendly behavior. Study 1: 279 participants completed the NCC, pro-environmental, and political ideology measures. Mediation analyses showed that NCC was related to less pro-environmental behavior through more right-wing political ideology. Study 2: We replicated these results with a nonstudent sample (n = 240) and both social and economic conservatism as mediators. The results of Study 2 showed that social conservatism mediated the relationship between NCC and pro-environmental behavior. Finally, NCC was associated with pro-environmental attitude through both social and economic conservatism.
References
2007). Conservatism and concern for the environment. Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 30, 1–25.
(2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
(2015). Environmental attitudes mediate the link between need for cognition and pro-environmental goal choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.032
(2005). Decision making for the environment: Social and behavioral science research priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
(2016). The closing of open minds: Need for closure moderates the impact of uncertainty salience on outgroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12131
(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
(2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
(The moderating role of interest in politics on the relations between conservative political orientation and denial of climate change. Society & Natural Resources.
(in press).2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000005
(2014). “Beauty is no quality in things themselves”: Epistemic motivation affects implicit preferences for art. PLoS one, 9, e110323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110323
(2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
(2003). Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters. Environment and Behavior, 35, 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503035003003
(1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1376
(2011). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399101
(1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
(1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7, 428–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657500700402
(2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
(1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013–1028.
(2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000580
(2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517273
(1994). How conservative are greenies? Environmental attitudes, conservatism, and traditional morality among university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539408259486
(1994). Factors influencing community residents’ participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26, 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916594265001
(2009). Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. Journal of Politics, 71, 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090938
(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2016). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002
(1992). The changing face of the environmental coalition: A research note. Environment and Behavior, 24, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592241006
(1984). Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study. American Political Science Review, 78, 1000–1018. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955804
(2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71, 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090719
(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
(2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028
(1998). A general measure of ecological behavioral. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
(2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784
(1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595501
(1989). The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.395
(2004). The psychology of the closed mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and” freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
(2016). The Role of cognitive style in the link between genes and political ideology. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12318
(2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371
(2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x
(2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.173
(2010). Anti-reflexivity the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 100–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001
(2017). Valuation theory: An environmental, developmental and evolutionary psychological approach. Implications for the field of environmental education. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 16, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2017-016-merc
(2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
(2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490805
(2004). The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 51, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.006
(2013). Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63, 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12040
(2011). The closed mind: “Experience” and “cognition” aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right-wing attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 25, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.775
(2015). Cognitive reappraisal and pro-environmental behavior: The role of global climate change perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2162
(2018). Mindfulness, pro-environmental behavior, and belief in climate change: The mediating role of social dominance. Environment and Behavior, Advance on line publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517718887
(2005). Revised need for cognitive closure scale, Unpublished manuscript, Università di Roma, “La Sapienza”, Italy, Rome.
(2015). Chapter four-the motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.01.2015.01.001
(2008). Why some hate to dilly-dally and others do not: The arousal-invoking capacity of decision-making for low-and high-scoring need for closure individuals. Social Cognition, 26, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.333
(2011a). Allport’s prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424894
(2011b). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004
(2005). Environmentalism, right-wing extremism, and social justice beliefs among East German adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000095
(2012).
(Promoting pro-environmental behavior . In S. ClaytonEd., The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556–580). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.1999). Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults’ political predispositions. Journal of Politics, 61, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647773
(2010). Pro-environmental behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05163.x
(2016). Life goals predict environmental behavior: Cross-cultural and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.02.001
(2002). The effects of ambiguity and need for closure on the acquisition of information. Social Cognition, 20, 380–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.5.380.21124
(1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it's measured? Environment and Behavior, 13, 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136001
(1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
(2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509357871
(