Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Don’t Put Me in This Group

Assignment to Non-Preferred Groups Increases Disidentification and a Preference for Negative Ingroup Information

Published Online:December 10, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000363

Abstract

Abstract. Not all group memberships are self-chosen. The current research examines whether assignments to non-preferred groups influence our relationship with the group and our preference for information about the ingroup. It was expected and found that, when people are assigned to non-preferred groups, they perceive the group as different to the self, experience negative emotions about the assignment and in turn disidentify with the group. On the other hand, when people are assigned to preferred groups, they perceive the group as similar to the self, experience positive emotions about the assignment and in turn identify with the group. Finally, disidentification increases a preference for negative information about the ingroup.

References

  • Ashforth, B. E., Joshi, M., Anand, V. & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2013). Extending the expanded model of organizational identification to occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2426–2448. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12190 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2003). The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000045 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Scholten, W. & Smith, H. (2010). To be or not to be: The impact of implicit versus explicit inappropriate social categorizations on the self. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X400830 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becker, J. C. & Tausch, N. (2014). When group memberships are negative: The concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13, 294–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2013.819991 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. & Elsbach, K. D. (2002). Us versus them: The roles of organizational identification and disidentification in social marketing initiatives. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.26.17608 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Branscombe, N., Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. EllemersR. SpearsB. DoosjeEds., Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P. & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cadinu, M. R. & De Amicis, L. (1999). The relationship between the self and the ingroup: When having a common conception helps. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.58.4.226 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Chang, K., Kuo, C.-C., Su, M. & Taylor, J. (2013). Dis-identification in organizations and its role in the workplace. Industrial Relations, 68, 479. https://doi.org/10.7202/1018437ar First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coats, S., Smith, E. R., Claypool, H. M. & Banner, M. J. (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1416 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Vreeze, J. & Matschke, C. (2017). Keeping up appearances: Strategic information exchange by disidentified group members. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175155 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Vreeze, J., Matschke, C. & Cress, U. (2018). Neither fish nor fowl: A perceived mismatch in norms and values between oneself, other students, and people back home undermines adaptation to university. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 684–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12253 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. HigginsA. W. KruglanskiEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777–798). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dean, J. (2008). The lady doth protest too much Theorizing disidentification in contemporary gender politics. Working Papers in Ideology and Discourse Analysis, 24, 1–19. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diener, E. & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Doosje, B., Ellemers, N. & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(5), 410–436. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Doosje, B., Spears, R. & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn’t all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.642 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R. M. & Parks, J. M. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. A. WhettenP. C. GodfreyEds., Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations (pp. 245–256). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. (2012). The group self. Science, 336, 848–852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220987 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.3.617 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellemers, N., Wilke, H. & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.766 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elsbach, K. D. (1999). An expanded model of organizational identification. In R. I. SuttonB. M. StawEds., Research in organizational behavior (pp. 163–199). New York, NY: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Elsbach, K. D. & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Defining who you are by what you’re not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organizational Science, 12, 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Finchilescu, G. (1986). Effect of incompatibility between internal and external group membership criteria on intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420160113 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glasford, D. E., Pratto, F. & Dovidio, J. F. (2008). Intragroup dissonance: Responses to ingroup violation of personal values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hamstra, M. R. W., Sassenberg, K., van Yperen, N. W., Wisse, B. & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). Regulatory fit buffers against disidentification from groups. Motivation Science, 1, 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experiences and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johns, M., Schmader, T. & Lickel, B. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860500145822 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kerr, N. L. & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kreiner, G. E. & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lai, J. Y. M., Chan, K. W. & Lam, L. W. (2013). Defining who you are not: The roles of moral dirtiness and occupational and organizational disidentification in affecting casino employee turnover intention. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1659–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J. & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.10371/0022-3514.79.4.602 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M. & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Identity salience moderates processing of group-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J. & Kimmerle, J. (2013). The Impact of Group Membership on Collaborative Learning with Wikis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 121031090448000. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0254 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Matschke, C. & Sassenberg, K. (2010). Does rejection lead to disidentification? The role of internal motivation and avoidance strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 891–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.756 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Medina, J. (2003). Identity trouble: Disidentification and the problem of difference. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29, 655–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453703296002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moreland, R. L. & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 137–192). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 124–203). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rink, F. & Ellemers, N. (2007). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18, S17–S27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00523.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roseman, I. J., Antoniou, A. A. & Jose, P. E. (1996). Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 241–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380240 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S. & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal, H. E. S. & Crisp, R. J. (2006). Reducing Stereotype Threat by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205281009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204274092 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sedikides, C.Brewer, M. B. (Eds.) (2001). Individual self, relational self, and collective self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spears, R., Doosje, B. & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P. & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tanis, M. & Postmes, T. (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, 53, 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/53.4.676 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tindale, R. S. & Kameda, T. (2000). “Social Sharedness” as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003002002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tropp, L. R. & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Knippenberg, D. & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D. (1988). The vicissitudes of mood measurement: effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.128 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilder, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar