Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Observing Synchrony in Dyads

Effects on Observers’ Expectations and Intentions

Published Online:April 17, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000377

Abstract

Abstract. This research tested whether observing members of a dyad behave in synchrony influences observers’ expectations and intentions about that dyad. In four studies, participants observed a dyad move in synchrony and were asked to make inferences about them. Results suggest that interpersonal synchrony serves as a social cue, such that observers expect the members of the dyad to work well together. Moreover, synchrony makes observers more likely to want to affiliate with the dyad. These findings shed light on how the social function of synchrony extends beyond the people who experience it to those who observe it.

References

  • Allsop, J. S., Vaitkus, T., Marie, D., & Miles, L. K. (2016). Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 27, 1462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, S., Zhou, H., Monteleone, G., Majka, E., Quinn, K., Ball, A. B., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2014). You are in sync with me: Neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience, 26(277), 842–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caporael, L. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hansen, J., Dechêne, A., & Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27, 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374586 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Collective efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bulbulia, J., Schjødt, U., Jegindø, E. M., Wallot, S., … Roepstorff, A. (2011). Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8514–8519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016955108 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krüger, T., Mata, A., & Ihmels, M. (2014). The presenter’s paradox revisited: An evaluation mode account. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1086/678393 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kupper, Z., Ramseyer, F., Hoffmann, H., & Tschacher, W. (2015). Nonverbal synchrony in social interactions of patients with schizophrenia indicates socio-communicative deficits. PLoS One, 10, e0145882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145882 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • LaFrance, M. (1985). Postural mirroring and intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 207–217. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Launay, J., Tarr, B., & Dunbar, R. I. (2016). Synchrony as an adaptive mechanism for large-scale human social bonding. Ethology, 122, 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01064 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K., & Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand waving: Action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marques-Quinteiro, P., Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Passos, A. M., & Curral, L. (2015). Measuring adaptive performance in individuals and teams. Team Performance Management, 21, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2015-0014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., Henderson, Z., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Moving memories: Behavioral synchrony and memory for self and others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 457–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Newman, J. P., Wolff, W. T., & Hearst, E. (1980). The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 630–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.630 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schubert, T. W., Toscano, H., & Waldzus, S. (2016). Order effects in synchrony. Unpublished manuscript, Instituto Universitário. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding Social Cognition. In G. R. SeminE. R. SmithEds., Embodied grounding: social, cognitive, affective and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 119–147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Lorusso, L., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Active and passive-touch during interpersonal multisensory stimulation change self-other boundaries. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1352–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.09.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Toscano, H., & Schubert, T. W. (2015). Judged and remembered trustworthiness of faces is enhanced by experiencing multisensory synchrony and asynchrony in the right order. PLoS One, 10, e0145664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145664 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vicary, S., Sperling, M., Von Zimmermann, J., Richardson, D. C., & Orgs, G. (2017). Joint action aesthetics. PLoS One, 12, e0180101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180101 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015). Relative processing fluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414561766 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson, M. (2001). Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 543–553. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar