Abstract
Abstract. Turning verbal theories into formal models is an essential business of a mature science. Here I elaborate on taxonomies of models, provide ten lessons for translating a verbal theory into a formal model, and discuss the specific challenges involved in collaborations between modelers and non-modelers. It’s a start.
References
1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215–227. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2628128
(1999).
(Can unrealistic computer models illuminate theoretical biology? . In A. WuEd., Proceedings of 1999 genetic and evolutionary computation conference workshop program (pp. 20–23). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.2003). Artificial life: Organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.012
(2007). Agent-based modelling as scientific method: A case study analysing primate social behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 1685–1699. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2061
(2018). How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions (Vol. 3). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(2017). Simulate this! An introduction to agent-based models and their power to improve your research practice. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.115
(2019). Different modelling purposes. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22, 6. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3993
(1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390197
(1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199905/06)4:5<41::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-F
(2008). Why model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11, 12. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/12.html
(2010). Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: A review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7, 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0142
(2020). Practical methodological reform needs good theory. Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/jcs6e
(1975).
(Logic and conversation . In P. ColeJ. L. MorganEds., Syntax and semantics Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.2010). The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2760–2768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.019
(2020). The ODD protocol for describing agent-based and other simulation models: A second update to improve clarity, replication, and structural realism. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 23, 7. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4259
(2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/rybh9/
(2014). Models in biology: “Accurate descriptions of our pathetic thinking”. BMC Biology, 12, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-12-29
(1964). A defense of beanbag genetics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 7, 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1964.0042
(2017). Fuck nuance. Sociological Theory, 35, 118–127.
(1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York, NY: Basic Books.
(1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79, 2554–2558. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554
(2019). The flatland fallacy: Moving beyond low-dimensional thinking. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11, 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12404
(1971).
(Articulation of parts explanation in biology and the rational search for them . In R. C. BuckR. S. CohenEds., PSA 1970 (pp. 257–272). Philosophy of Science Association.1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 115, 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
(2007). The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 667–694. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.4.667
(2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117, 785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019688
(1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54, 421–431. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27836590
(1981). On constraints and adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 244–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00008694
(2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44, 122–130.Retrieved from . https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/345689
(2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
(2017). Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 7853–7860. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620741114
(1995). Artificial life as theoretical biology: How to do real science with computer simulation. Cognitive Science Research Paper 378. Brighton: University of Sussex.
(2015). Strategic modelling and business dynamics: A feedback systems approach. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
(2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1
(2014). A theoretical formalism for analyzing agent-based models. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-3206-2-3
(2013). Why simulate? To develop a mental model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16, 12. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2235
(2018). The model thinker: What you need to know to make data work for you. New York, NY: Hachette.
(2020). Invisible hands and fine calipers: A call to use formal theory as a toolkit for theory construction. Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/ugz7y/
(2001). Beyond reductionism: Refocusing on the individual with individual-based modeling. Complexity, 6, 33–40.
(1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
(2014). Not just a theory? The utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology. PLoS Biology, 12, e1002017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002017
(2017).
(Models are stupid, and we need more of them . In R. R. VallacherS. J. ReadA. NowakEds., Computational social psychology (pp. 311–331). New York, NY: Routledge.2019a). Better methods can’t make up for mediocre theory. Nature, 575, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03350-5
(2019b). Five models of science, illustrating how selection shapes methods. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ghb4p
(2015). Theory development with agent-based models. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614546944
(2018). The evolution of covert signaling. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22926-1
(2019). Niche diversity can explain cross-cultural differences in personality structure. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 1276–1283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0730-3
(2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294789
(2003). Historical dynamics: Why states rise and fall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(2016). Ages of discord: A structural-demographic analysis of American history. Chaplin, CT: Beresta Books.
(2020). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/7qbpr/
(1997). How to build an economic model in your spare time. The American Economist, 41, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434515627089
(2011). Everything is obvious: * Once you know the answer. New York, NY: Crown Business.
(2012). Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2014). Ecologists should not use statistical significance tests to interpret simulation model results. Oikos, 123, 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01073.x
(2013). EO Wilson is wrong again – not about math, but about collaboration. Retrieved from http://jonfwilkins.com/2013/04/e-o-wilson-is-wrong-again-not-about-math-but-about-collaboration/
(1987).
(False models as means to truer theories . In M. H. NiteckiA. HoffmanEds., Neutral models in biology (pp. 23–55). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.