Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Nudging for Lockdown

Behavioral Insights From an Online Experiment

Published Online:June 29, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000483

Abstract

Abstract. We test the effectiveness of a social comparison nudge (SCN) to enhance lockdown compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic using a French representative sample (N = 1,154). Respondents were randomly assigned to a favorable/unfavorable informational feedback (daily road traffic mobility patterns, in Normandy – a region of France) on peer lockdown compliance. Our dependent variable was the intention to comply with a possible future lockdown. We controlled for risk, time, and social preferences and tested the effectiveness of the nudge. We found no evidence of the effectiveness of the SCN among the whole French population, but the nudge was effective when its recipient and the reference population shared the same geographical location (Normandy). Exploratory results on this subsample (N = 52) suggest that this effectiveness could be driven by noncooperative individuals.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1980). A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), 749–775. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1082–1095. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3003–3037. 10.1257/aer.104.10.3003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Almqvist, G., & Andersson, P. (2020). Carrots, sticks, sermons, and nudges during the pandemic. “Sweden through the crisis”. Stockholm School of Economics. https://www.hhs.se/en/research/sweden-through-the-crisis/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Amat, F., Arenas, A., Falcó-Gimeno, A., & Muñoz, J. (2020). Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Spain. Working Paper. https://osf.io/dkusw First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, L. R., & Mellor, J. M. (2008). Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. Journal of Health Economics, 27(5), 1260–1274. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.05.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2012). Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3333–3356. 10.1257/aer.102.7.3333 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. Groups, Leadership and Men, 58, 295–303. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. 10.1037/h0093718 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bargain, O., & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 192, 104316. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104316 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., … Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460–471. 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841–877. 10.1086/261957 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bertin, P., Nera, K., & Delouvée, S. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination, and support for hydroxychloroquine: A conceptual replication-extension in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2471. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Betsch, C., Böhm, R., & Chapman, G. B. (2015). Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 61–73. 10.1177/2372732215600716 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bicchieri, C., & Dimant, E. (2019). Nudging with care: The risks and benefits of social information. Public choice. 10.1007/s11127-019-00684-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blayac, T., Dubois, D., Duchêne, S., Nguyen-Van, P., Ventelou, B., & Willinger, M. (2022). Designing acceptable anti-COVID-19 policies by taking into account individuals’ preferences: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Working paper. Available on request. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blayac, T., Dubois, D., Duchêne, S., Nguyen-Van, P., Ventelou, B., & Willinger, M. (2021). Population preferences for inclusive COVID-19 policy responses. The Lancet Public Health, 6(1), e9. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30285-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bonardi, J. P., Gallea, Q., Kalanoski, D., & Lalive, R. (2020). Fast and local: How did lockdown policies affect the spread and severity of the covid-19. Covid Economics, 23, 325–351. https://e4s.center/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Fastandlocal_full_EN-1.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Charness, G., Garcia, T., Offerman, T., & Villeval, M. C. (2020). Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 60(2), 99–123. 10.1007/s11166-020-09325-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F., & Stevens, R. (2017). Applying lessons from behavioral economics to increase flu vaccination rates. Health promotion international, 32(6), 1067–1073. 10.1093/heapro/daw031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, Y., & Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431–457. 10.1257/aer.99.1.431 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, Y., Harper, F. M., Konstan, J., & Li, S. X. (2010). Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1358–1398. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, Y., Lu, F., & Zhang, J. (2017). Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 11–20. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.08.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Academic Press. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Collange, F., Verger, P., Launay, O., & Pulcini, C. (2016). Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviors of general practitioners/family physicians toward their own vaccination: A systematic review. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 12(5), 1282–1292. 10.1080/21645515.2015.1138024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2013). Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 680–702. 10.1111/jeea.12011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Ridder, D., Kroese, F., & van Gestel, L. (2021). Nudgeability: Mapping conditions of susceptibility to nudge influence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1745691621995183. 10.1177/1745691621995183 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Debnath, R., & Bardhan, R. (2020). India nudges to contain COVID-19 pandemic: A reactive public policy analysis using machine-learning based topic modelling. PLoS One, 15(9), e0238972. 10.1371/journal.pone.0238972 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Delmas, M. A., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550. 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Drouvelis, M., & Nosenzo, D. (2013). Group identity and leading-by-example. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 414–425. 10.1016/j.joep.2013.06.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1645–1692. 10.1093/qje/qjy013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferraresi, M., Kotsogiannis, C., Rizzo, L., & Secomandi, R. (2020a). The ‘great lockdown’ and its determinants. Economics Letters, 197, 109628. 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109628 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferraresi, M., Kotsogiannis, C., Rizzo, L., & Secomandi, R. (2020b) COVID-19: Lockdown and institutions (Vol. 755). Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipu/wpaper/89.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frey, R., Pedroni, A., Mata, R., Rieskamp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3(10), e10701381. 10.1126/sciadv.1701381 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gächter, S., Gerhards, L., & Nosenzo, D. (2017). The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing. European Economic Review, 97, 72–86. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2021). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 16(4), e0249596. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galizzi, M. M., Machado, S. R., & Miniaci, R. (2016). Temporal stability, cross-validity, and external validity of risk preferences measures: Experimental evidence from a UK representative sample. SSRN Working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2822613 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Galizzi, M. M., & Navarro-Martinez, D. (2019). On the external validity of social preference games: A systematic lab-field study. Management Science, 65(3), 976–1002. 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2908 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 631–645. 10.1162/003355397555217 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96(2), 212–216. 10.1257/000282806777211658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, M., Platzer, C., Zwarg, C., & Göritz, A. S. (2020). Public acceptance of Covid‐19 lockdown scenarios. International Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 551–565. 10.1002/ijop.12721 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., Sheeran, P., Trötschel, R., & Webb, T. L. (2011). Self-regulation of priming effects on behavior. Psychological Science, 22(7), 901–907. 10.1177%2F095679761141158610.1177/0956797611411586 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harrison, G. W., Hofmeyr, A., Ross, D., & Swarthout, J. T. (2018). Risk preferences, time preferences, and smoking behavior. Southern Economic Journal, 85(2), 313–348. 10.1002/soej.12275 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hume, S., John, P., Sanders, M., & Stockdale, E. (2020). Nudge in the time of coronavirus: Compliance to behavioural messages during crisis. SSRN Working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3644165 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jullien, D. (2018). “Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions”. In L. FioritoS. ScheallC. E. Suprinyak (Eds.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology (Vol. 36C, pp. 119-155). Emerald Publishing Limited. 10.1108/S0743-41542018000036C007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kagel, J. H., & Roth, A. E. (Eds.). (2020). The handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuiper, M. E., de Bruijn, A. L., Folmer, C. R., Olthuis, E., Brownlee, M., Kooistra, E. B., Fine, A., & van Rooij, B. (2020). The intelligent lockdown: Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in the Netherlands. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper. No. 2020-20. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3598215 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lecouteux, G. (2015). In search of lost nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 397–408. 10.1007/s13164-015-0265-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levati, M. V., Sutter, M., & Van Der Heijden, E. (2007). Leading by example in a public goods experiment with heterogeneity and incomplete information. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 793–818. 10.1177/0022002707302796 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174. 10.1257/jep.21.2.153 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. KruglanskiE. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353–383). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Massin, S., Ventelou, B., Nebout, A., Verger, P., & Pulcini, C. (2015). Cross-sectional survey: Risk-averse French general practitioners are more favorable toward influenza vaccination. Vaccine, 33(5), 610–614. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.038 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mongin, P., & Cozic, M. (2018). Rethinking nudge: Not one but three concepts. Behavioural Public Policy, 2(1), 107–124. 10.1017/bpp.2016.16 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Müller, S., & Rau, H. A. (2021). Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Public Economics, 194, 104322. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104322 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 771–781. 10.2139/ssrn.1804189 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nivette, A., Ribeaud, D., Murray, A., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Hepp, U., Shanahan, L., & Eisner, M. (2021). Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: Insights from a longitudinal cohort study. Social Science & Medicine, 268, 113370. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113370 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nolan, J. M. (2017). Social norms and their enforcement. In S. G. HarkinsK. D. WilliamsJ. M. Burger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social influence. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Painter, M., & Qiu, T. (2021). Political beliefs affect compliance with covid-19 social distancing orders. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 185, 688–701. 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.03.019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Plohl, N., & Musil, B. (2021). Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(1), 1–12. 10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Préget, R., Nguyen-Van, P., & Willinger, M. (2016). Who are the voluntary leaders? Experimental evidence from a sequential contribution game. Theory and Decision, 81(4), 581–599. 10.1007/s11238-016-9550-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rafaï, I. (2022). Data and the statistical code for “Nudging for lockdown: Behavioral insights from an online experiment.” https://osf.io/a39nw/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rafaï, I., Blayac, T., Dubois, D., Duchêne, S., Nguyen Van, P., Ventelou, B., & Willinger, M. (2022). Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting compliance with COVID-19 prophylactic measures. Working Paper, Available at SSRN 4031918. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4031918 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rafaï, I., Ribaillier, A., & Jullien, D. (2021). The impact on nudge acceptability judgments of framing and consultation of the targeted population. Available at SSRN 4055385. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4055385 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, P. J., Botzen, W. J. W., Kunreuther, H., & Chaudhry, S. J. (2021). Default options and insurance demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 183, 39–56. 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sailer, M., Stadler, M., Botes, E., Fischer, F., & Greiff, S. (2022). Science knowledge and trust in medicine affect individuals' behavior in pandemic crises. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(1), 279–292. 10.1007/s10212-021-00529-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sanders, M., Stockdale, E., Hume, S., & John, P. (2021). Loss aversion fails to replicate in the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from an online experiment. Economics Letters, 199, 109433. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sheth, K., & Wright, G. C. (2020). The usual suspects: Do risk tolerance, altruism, and health predict the response to COVID-19? Review of Economics of the Household, 18(4), 1041–1052. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sibony, A.-L. (2020). The UK covid-19 response: A behavioural irony? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 11(2), 350–357. 10.1017/err.2020.22 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and social psychology review, 8(3), 220–247. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2017). On the trail of social comparison. In S. G. HarkinsK. D. WilliamsJ. M. Burger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social influence (Chapter 5). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. WorchelW. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taube, O., & Vetter, M. (2019). How green defaults promote environmentally friendly decisions: Attitude‐conditional default acceptance but attitude‐unconditional effects on actual choices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(11), 721–732. 10.1111/jasp.12629 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Theotokis, A., & Manganari, E. (2015). The impact of choice architecture on sustainable consumer behavior: The role of guilt. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 423–437. 10.1007/s10551-014-2287-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thøgersen, J. (2014). The mediated influences of perceived norms on pro-environmental behavior. Revue d'économie politique, 124(2), 179–193. 10.3917/redp.242.0179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thürmer, J. L., Bieleke, M., Wieber, F., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2020). If-then plans help regulate automatic peer influence on impulse buying. European Journal of Marketing, 54(9), 2079–2105. 10.1108/EJM-05-2018-0341 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vieider, F. M., Lefebvre, M., Bouchouicha, R., Chmura, T., Hakimov, R., Krawczyk, M., & Martinsson, P. (2015). Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: Evidence from 30 countries. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(3), 421–452. 10.1111/jeea.12102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, Z., Rafaï, I., & Willinger, M. (2022). How age affects risk and time preferences: Evidence from a representative sample. Working paper, SSRN 4031930. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4031930 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wen, X., Rafaï, I., Duchêne, S., & Willinger, M. (2022). Did mindful people do better during the COVID-19 pandemic? Mindfulness is associated with well-being and compliance with prophylactic measures. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5051. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Winkelmann, R., & Boes, S. (2006). Analysis of microdata. Springer Science & Business Media. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, A. L., Sonin, K., Driscoll, J., & Wilson, J. (2020). Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 544–554. 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zajenowski, M., Jonason, P. K., Leniarska, M., & Kozakiewicz, Z. (2020). Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19?: Personality and perceptions of the COVID-19 situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110199. 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110199 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zettler, I., Schild, C., Lilleholt, L., Kroencke, L., Utesch, T., Moshagen, M., Böhm, R., Back, M. D., & Geukes, K. (2022). The role of personality in COVID-19-related perceptions, evaluations, and behaviors: Findings across five samples, nine traits, and 17 criteria. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 299–310. 10.1177/19485506211001680 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar