Together to Welcome, Together to Exclude
Intergroup Contact as an Antecedent of Collective and Interpersonal Behaviors Pro and Against Migrants
Abstract
Abstract. This preregistered study examined whether positive and negative intergroup contact with migrants relates to collective action supporting and opposing migrants as well as to interpersonal exclusion toward them via the key processes identified in the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. Structural equation models conducted on cross-sectional data from 506 Italian and English participants showed that positive (negative) contact related to higher (lower) collective inclusion and lower (higher) collective and interpersonal exclusion of migrants via group anger, identification, and efficacy. Considering positive and negative contact, collective action pro and against migrants and interpersonal behaviors simultaneously, this study provided a nuanced picture of the antecedents and processes underlying the advantaged group members’ behaviors toward migrants.
References
2016). Research in social psychology: Consequences of short- and long-term social exclusion. In P. RivaJ. Eck (Eds.) Social Exclusion: Psychological Approaches to Understanding and Reducing Its Impact (pp. 51-72). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-33033-4_3
. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
(2016). Intergroup relations in Latin America: Intergroup contact, common ingroup identity, and activism among indigenous groups in Mexico and Chile. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 355–375. 10.1111/josi.12170
(2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the “sedative” effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 606–627. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075
(2019). The racial composition of students’ friendship networks predicts perceptions of injustice and involvement in collective action. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–61. 10.1002/jts5.27
(2019). Introduction to intergroup contact and collective action: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 3–10. 10.1002/jts5.42
(2021). Can moral convictions against gender inequality overpower system justification effects? Examining the interaction between moral conviction and system justification. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1111/bjso.12451
(2021). Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 26-47. 10.1177/1368430219889134
(2000). Reducing Intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
(2019). Intergroup contact with migrants is linked to support for migrants through attitudes, especially in people who are politically right wing. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 73, 102–106. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.09.001
(2017). Protect, correct, and eject: Ostracism as a social influence tool. In The Oxford handbook of social influence (pp. 205–217). Oxford Library of Psychology.
(2019). Support for collective action against refugees: The role of national, European, and global identifications, and autochthony beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1439–1455. 10.1002/ejsp.2608
(2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 380–386. 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z
(2020). Intergroup contact and social change: An integrated Contact-Collective Action Model. Journal of Social Issues, 1–25. Advanced online publication. 10.1111/josi.12412
(2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 347–364. 10.1177/0146167216685291
(2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 111. 10.1017/S0140525X10000725
(2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1701–1722. 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x
(1940). Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 301–310. 10.1080/00223980.1940.9917696
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
(2018). The reception of immigrants and refugees in Western countries: The challenges of our time. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 662–673. 10.1111/josi.12292
(2013). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84(3), 772–790. 10.1111/cdev.12012
(2019). Meeting a nice asylum seeker: Intergroup contact changes stereotype content perceptions and associated emotional prejudices, and encourages solidarity-based collective action intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 668–690. 10.1111/bjso.12304
(2019). Extending the benefits of intergroup contact beyond attitudes: When does intergroup contact predict greater collective action support? Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 11–22. 10.1002/jts5.23
(2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
(2009). Six factors fostering protest: Predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Political Psychology, 30(6), 896–920. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00732.x
(2022). Supplemental materials to “Together to welcome, together to exclude: Intergroup contact as an antecedent of collective and interpersonal behaviors pro and against migrants”. https://osf.io/dge78/?view_only=bfd6c49f65244ddc8b3263ace1208101
(2020). Surrendering to social emptiness: Chronic social exclusion longitudinally predicts resignation in asylum seekers. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advanced online publication. 10.1111/bjso.12410
(2005). Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models. In A. Maydeu-OlivaresJ. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
(2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. 10.1177/1368430210390533
(2021). The Social Exclusion Bench Tool (SEBT): A visual way of assessing interpersonal social exclusion. MethodsX, 8, 101495. 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101495
(2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian Water Movement. Political Psychology, 36(3), 315–330. 10.1111/pops.12101
(2019). When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 688–707. 10.1177/1368430218761568
(2019). The effect of intergroup contact on solidarity-based collective action is mediated by reductions in SDO. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(5), 307–318. 10.1111/jasp.12586
(2013). Driven to exclude: How core social motives explain social exclusion. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of social exclusion. (pp. 31–42) ISDSA Press.
(2019). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244–269. 10.1002/ejsp.2522
(2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121-136. 10.1177/0146167216676478
(2016). The many faces of social exclusion. In P. RivaJ. Eck (Eds.), Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (pp. 9–15). Springer.
(2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. 10.1007/BF02296192
(2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 893–912. 10.1177/1368430217690908
(2018). The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promoting collective action against immigrant groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 447–459. 10.1002/ejsp.2346
(2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.89
(2020). Zero-sum beliefs shape advantaged allies' support for collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1259–1275. 10.1002/ejsp.2674
(1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. AustinS. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
(2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 313–354. 10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8
(2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. 10.1177/0146167219879111
(2013). Four core social‐psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378-388. 10.1111/spc3.12031
(2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
(2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 735–753. 10.1177/1368430210395637
(2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
(2021). Ambivalent effects of positive contact between women and men on collective actions for women's rights. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(9), 1358-1373. 10.1177/0146167220974162
(2017). Negative intergroup contact and support for social policies toward the minority outgroup in the aftermath of a natural disaster. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(4), 407–415. 10.1080/00224545.2016.1184126
(M., Villa (Ed.) (2019). Migrazioni e comunicazione politica Le elezioni regionali 2018 tra vecchi e nuovi media. [Migration and political communication: The 2018 regional elections between old and new media] (ISMU INIZIATIVE E STUDI SULLA MULTIETNICITÀ). Franco Angeli.
2021, January 11). 'Bring an end to the inhuman disregard...'. The Psychologist. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/bring-end-inhuman-disregard. last access August 20, 2022.
(2020). Migrants: Rival protests in Dover, UK. InfoMigrants. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/27096/migrants-rival-protests-in-dover-uk
(2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275–314. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
(2018). Practical statistical power analysis using webpower and R. Isdsa Press.
(