Skip to main content
Original Article

Together to Welcome, Together to Exclude

Intergroup Contact as an Antecedent of Collective and Interpersonal Behaviors Pro and Against Migrants

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000497

Abstract. This preregistered study examined whether positive and negative intergroup contact with migrants relates to collective action supporting and opposing migrants as well as to interpersonal exclusion toward them via the key processes identified in the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. Structural equation models conducted on cross-sectional data from 506 Italian and English participants showed that positive (negative) contact related to higher (lower) collective inclusion and lower (higher) collective and interpersonal exclusion of migrants via group anger, identification, and efficacy. Considering positive and negative contact, collective action pro and against migrants and interpersonal behaviors simultaneously, this study provided a nuanced picture of the antecedents and processes underlying the advantaged group members’ behaviors toward migrants.

References

  • Bernstein, M. J. (2016). Research in social psychology: Consequences of short- and long-term social exclusion. In P. RivaJ. Eck (Eds.) Social Exclusion: Psychological Approaches to Understanding and Reducing Its Impact (pp. 51-72). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-33033-4_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cakal, H., Eller, A., Sirlopú, D., & Pérez, A. (2016). Intergroup relations in Latin America: Intergroup contact, common ingroup identity, and activism among indigenous groups in Mexico and Chile. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 355–375. 10.1111/josi.12170 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwar, G., & Heath, A. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the “sedative” effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 606–627. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carter, E. R., Brady, S. T., Murdock-Perriera, L. A., Gilbertson, M. K., Ablorh, T., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). The racial composition of students’ friendship networks predicts perceptions of injustice and involvement in collective action. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–61. 10.1002/jts5.27 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choma, B. L., & McKeown, S. (2019). Introduction to intergroup contact and collective action: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 3–10. 10.1002/jts5.42 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Cristofaro, V., Pellegrini, V., Giacomantonio, M., Livi, S., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Can moral convictions against gender inequality overpower system justification effects? Examining the interaction between moral conviction and system justification. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1111/bjso.12451 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Di Bernardo, G. A., Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., McKeown, S., Cocco, V. M., Saguy, T., & Dixon, J. (2021). Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 26-47. 10.1177/1368430219889134 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing Intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graf, S., & Sczesny, S. (2019). Intergroup contact with migrants is linked to support for migrants through attitudes, especially in people who are politically right wing. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 73, 102–106. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.09.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hales, A. H., Ren, D., & Williams, K. D. (2017). Protect, correct, and eject: Ostracism as a social influence tool. In The Oxford handbook of social influence (pp. 205–217). Oxford Library of Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hasbun Lopez, P., Martinović, B., Bobowik, M., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Ernst-Vintila, A., Franc, R., Fülöp, É., Ghilani, D., Kochar, A., & Žeželj, I. (2019). Support for collective action against refugees: The role of national, European, and global identifications, and autochthony beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1439–1455. 10.1002/ejsp.2608 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hässler, T., Ullrich, J., Bernardino, M., Shnabel, N., Van Laar, C., Valdenegro, D., Sebben, S., Tropp, L. R., Visintin, E. P., González, R., & Ugarte, L. M. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 380–386. 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hässler, T., Uluğ, Ö. M., Kappmeier, M., & Travaglino, G. A. (2020). Intergroup contact and social change: An integrated Contact-Collective Action Model. Journal of Social Issues, 1–25. Advanced online publication. 10.1111/josi.12412 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayward, L. E., Tropp, L. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 347–364. 10.1177/0146167216685291 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 111. 10.1017/S0140525X10000725 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J., Blackwood, L., Louis, W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., O'Brien, A., Paasonen, K. E., Smith, J., White, K. M., & White, K. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1701–1722. 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hovland, C. I., & Sears, R. R. (1940). Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 301–310. 10.1080/00223980.1940.9917696 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jetten, J., & Esses, V. M. (2018). The reception of immigrants and refugees in Western countries: The challenges of our time. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 662–673. 10.1111/josi.12292 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84(3), 772–790. 10.1111/cdev.12012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kotzur, P. F., Schäfer, S. J., & Wagner, U. (2019). Meeting a nice asylum seeker: Intergroup contact changes stereotype content perceptions and associated emotional prejudices, and encourages solidarity-based collective action intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 668–690. 10.1111/bjso.12304 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2019). Extending the benefits of intergroup contact beyond attitudes: When does intergroup contact predict greater collective action support? Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 11–22. 10.1002/jts5.23 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mannarini, T., Roccato, M., Fedi, A., & Rovere, A. (2009). Six factors fostering protest: Predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Political Psychology, 30(6), 896–920. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00732.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marinucci, M., Mazzoni, D., De Cristofaro, V., Aureli, N., Shamloo, S. E., Guarino, A., & Tzankova, I. (2022). Supplemental materials to “Together to welcome, together to exclude: Intergroup contact as an antecedent of collective and interpersonal behaviors pro and against migrants”. https://osf.io/dge78/?view_only=bfd6c49f65244ddc8b3263ace1208101 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marinucci, M., & Riva, P. (2020). Surrendering to social emptiness: Chronic social exclusion longitudinally predicts resignation in asylum seekers. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advanced online publication. 10.1111/bjso.12410 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models. In A. Maydeu-OlivaresJ. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. 10.1177/1368430210390533 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mazzoni, D., Marinucci, M., Monzani, D., & Pravettoni, G. (2021). The Social Exclusion Bench Tool (SEBT): A visual way of assessing interpersonal social exclusion. MethodsX, 8, 101495. 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101495 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mazzoni, D., Van Zomeren, M., & Cicognani, E. (2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian Water Movement. Political Psychology, 36(3), 315–330. 10.1111/pops.12101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meleady, R., & Forder, L. (2019). When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 688–707. 10.1177/1368430218761568 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meleady, R., & Vermue, M. (2019). The effect of intergroup contact on solidarity-based collective action is mediated by reductions in SDO. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(5), 307–318. 10.1111/jasp.12586 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Driven to exclude: How core social motives explain social exclusion. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of social exclusion. (pp. 31–42) ISDSA Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244–269. 10.1002/ejsp.2522 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., … & Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121-136. 10.1177/0146167216676478 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Riva, P., & Eck, J. (2016). The many faces of social exclusion. In P. RivaJ. Eck (Eds.), Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (pp. 9–15). Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. 10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Selvanathan, H. P., Techakesari, P., Tropp, L. R., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 893–912. 10.1177/1368430217690908 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shepherd, L., Fasoli, F., Pereira, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2018). The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promoting collective action against immigrant groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 447–459. 10.1002/ejsp.2346 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.89 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stefaniak, A., Mallett, R. K., & Wohl, M. J. (2020). Zero-sum beliefs shape advantaged allies' support for collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1259–1275. 10.1002/ejsp.2674 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. AustinS. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 313–354. 10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. 10.1177/0146167219879111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social‐psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378-388. 10.1111/spc3.12031 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Bettache, K. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 735–753. 10.1177/1368430210395637 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vázquez, A., López-Rodríguez, L., Gómez Á., & Dovidio, J. F. (2021). Ambivalent effects of positive contact between women and men on collective actions for women's rights. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(9), 1358-1373. 10.1177/0146167220974162 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vezzali, L., Andrighetto, L., Di Bernardo, G. A., Nadi, C., & Bergamini, G. (2017). Negative intergroup contact and support for social policies toward the minority outgroup in the aftermath of a natural disaster. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(4), 407–415. 10.1080/00224545.2016.1184126 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • M., Villa (Ed.) (2019). Migrazioni e comunicazione politica Le elezioni regionali 2018 tra vecchi e nuovi media. [Migration and political communication: The 2018 regional elections between old and new media] (ISMU INIZIATIVE E STUDI SULLA MULTIETNICITÀ). Franco Angeli. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, U. (2021, January 11). 'Bring an end to the inhuman disregard...'. The Psychologist. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/bring-end-inhuman-disregard. last access August 20, 2022. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wallis, E. (2020). Migrants: Rival protests in Dover, UK. InfoMigrants. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/27096/migrants-rival-protests-in-dover-uk First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275–314. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using webpower and R. Isdsa Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar