Perceived Economic Inequality Measures and Their Association With Objective Inequality and Redistributive Preferences
Abstract
Abstract. Perceptions of economic inequality (PEI) play a central role in people’s responses to inequality. We aim to examine the consistency between different PEI measures (income gaps, diagrammatic figures, experienced downward and upward disparities), their relationship with objective inequality, and their association with redistributive preferences. Using data from the International Social Survey Programme 2019 (N = 34,387, 22 countries), we performed multilevel regression analyses and found that PEI indicators were weakly and positively correlated, suggesting that they represent different dimensions of the same construct. Furthermore, objective inequality was not related to PEI measures. Finally, all PEI measures were positively associated with support for redistribution, except for experienced upward inequality. We discuss the multidimensional nature of PEI and its implications on redistributive preferences.
References
2020). Urban conceptions of economic inequalities. Regional Studies, 54(6), 863–872. 10.1080/00343404.2020.1732902
(2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. Guilford.
(2019). An empirical analysis of the determinants of perceived inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 264–292. 10.1111/roiw.12351
(2021). I perceive therefore I demand: The formation of inequality perceptions and demand for redistribution. Review of Income and Wealth. Advance online publication. 10.1111/roiw.12497
(2012). Percepción de Desigualdad Económica en Chile: Medición, Diferencias y Determinantes Perception. Psykhe, 21(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282012000100007
(2022). Perception of economic inequality: Concepts, associated factors and prospects of a burgeoning research agenda. International Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1080/02134748.2021.2009275
(2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 332–341. 10.1037/pspp0000059
(2019). Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. European Journal of Political Economy, 58, 220244. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.12.004
(2020). Inequality in the social mind: Social comparison and support for redistribution. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 149–161. 10.1086/705686
(2015). Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: From social sampling to attitudes to redistribution. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1389–1400. 10.1177%2F0956797615586560, 10.1177/0956797615586560
(2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One, 10(4), 112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
(2020). Framing economic inequality and policy as group disadvantages (versus group advantages) spurs support for action. Nature Human Behavior. Advance online publication. 10.1038/s41562-020-00988-4
(2021). What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1):19-36. 10.1111/bjso.12468
(2021). The social psychology of economic inequality (WIDER Working Paper No. 2021/43). World Institute for Development Economic Research. 10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/981-5
(2018). Strong welfare states do not intensify public support for income redistribution, but even reduce it among the prosperous: A multilevel analysis of public opinion in 30 countries. Societies, 8(4), 1–52. 10.3390/soc8040105
(1992). Images of class: Public perceptions in Hungary and Australia. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 461–482. 10.2307/2096095
(2022). Perceived economic inequality measures have distinct effects on support for redistribution. 10.17605/OSF.IO/MUV9R
(2020). Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90. Advance online publication. 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019
(2019). I know people who can and who cannot: A measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 599–608. 10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008
(2021). How fair is economic inequality? Belief in a just world and the legitimation of economic disparities in 27 European countries. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. 10.1177%2F01461672211002366
(2020). Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 111–136. 10.1111/bjso.12326
(2019). The vicious cycle of economic inequality: The role of ideology in shaping the relationship between “what is” and “what ought to be” in 41 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 991–1001. 10.1177%2F1948550618811500, 10.1177/1948550618811500
(2018). Perceptions of economic inequality in Colombian daily life: More than unequal distribution of economic resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(September), 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660
(2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27–54. 10.1111/ecpo.12103
(2022). Conducting and evaluating multilevel studies: Recommendations, resources, and a checklist. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. 10.1177/10944281211060712
(2022). How economic inequality shapes thought and action. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(1), 146–161. 10.1002/jcpy.1277
(2014). Health Implications of Socioeconomic Characteristics, Subjective Social Status, and Perceptions of Inequality: An Empirical Study of China. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 495514. 10.1007/s11205-013-0514-5
(2021). Measuring Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Justice: An Empirical Assessment. Social Justice Research, 34(2), 119145. 10.1007/s11211-021-00368-x
(2019). What do the British public think of inequality in health, wealth, and power? Social Science and Medicine, 222(December 2018), 198–206. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.006
(2021). International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality V - ISSP 2019.GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7600 Data file Version 2.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13829
. (2022). Inequality in researchers’ minds: Four guiding questions for studying subjective perceptions of economic inequality. Journal of Economic Surveys. 10.1111/joes.12507
(2019). Putting a social psychological spotlight on economic inequality. In J. JettenK. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 1–18). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_1
(2021). Consequences of economic inequality for the social and political Vitality of society: A social identity analysis. Political Psychology, 42(S1), 241–266. 10.1111/pops.12800
(2017). The new income inequality and well-being paradigm: Inequality has no effect on happiness in rich nations and normal times, varied effects in extraordinary circumstances, increases happiness in poor nations, and interacts with individuals’ perceptions, attitudes, politics, and expectations for the future. Social Science Research, 62, 39–74. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.12.007
(2020). Perceptions of inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 65(August), 101927. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101927
(2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422–435. 10.1177/1745691616673192
(2020). The individual (mis-)perception of wage inequality: Measurement, correlates and implications. Empirical Economics, 59(5), 2039–2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01722-4
(2008). Group membership as a ‘frame of reference’ for interpersonal comparison. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 539–554. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00058.x
(2021). Eliciting preferences for redistribution across domains: A study on wealth, education, and health. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(1), 1141–1166. 10.1111/asap.12279
(2021). The link between income, income inequality, and prosocial behavior around the world. A multiverse approach. Social Psychology, 52(6), 375–386. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000466
(2021). Is America coming apart? Socioeconomic segregation in neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, and social networks, 1970–2020. Sociology Compass, 15(6), 1–16. 10.1111/soc4.12884
(1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
(2019). Attitudes toward economic inequality: The illusory agreement. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(4), 835–851. 10.1017/psrm.2018.18
(2017). Social class and ideologies of inequality: How they uphold unequal societies. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 99–116. 10.1111/josi.12206
(2019). Where Does the Money Come From? Humanizing High Socioeconomic Status Groups Undermines Attitudes Toward Redistribution. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(March),
(Article 110 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.007712021). The construct of subjective economic inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. 10.1177/1948550621996867
(2020). Human development report 2020. United Nations Development Programme. 10.18356/9789210055161
. (2021). People are more tolerant of inequality when it is expressed in terms of individuals rather than groups at the top. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(43). Advance online publication. 10.1073/pnas.2100430118
(2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
(2019). The support for economic inequality scale: Development and adjudication. PLoS ONE, 14(6), 1–29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0218685
(2020). Gini index (World Bank estimates). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI
. (