Skip to main content
Original Article

Cynical, But Useful?

A Lay Beliefs Perspective on Cynical Leaders’ Ability to Prevent Antisocial Behavior at Work

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000528

Abstract: Cynicism – the belief that people are driven primarily by self-interest – has been predominantly associated with detrimental consequences for individuals and organizations. Less is known about its potentially positive implications. We investigated whether lay people consider cynicism helpful in preventing antisocial behavior and therefore see value in cynical leaders. We found that people viewed cynical (vs. trusting) leaders as better at detecting antisocial behavior and more punitive, and therefore, as better at preventing employees’ antisocial behavior (Study 1). Despite this, cynical (vs. trusting) leaders were less likely to be hired, were offered lower salaries, and were seen as less effective (Study 2). This aversion to cynical leaders was attenuated for jobs that emphasized the importance of preventing antisocial behavior (Study 3).

References

  • Aljawarneh, N. M. S., & Atan, T. (2018). Linking tolerance to workplace incivility, service innovative, knowledge hiding, and job search behavior: The mediating role of employee cynicism. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11(4), 298–320. 10.1111/ncmr.12136 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Allred, K. D., & Smith, T. W. (1991). Social cognition in cynical hostility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15(5), 399–412. 10.1007/BF01173034 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 449–469. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199709)18:5<449::AID-JOB808>3.0.CO;2-O First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D., & Vazire, S. (2015). The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 296–307. 10.1002/per.1998 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, K. G., Smith, T. W., Butner, J., Nealey-Moore, J., Hawkins, M. W., & Uchino, B. N. (2007). Hostility, anger, and marital adjustment: Concurrent and prospective associations with psychosocial vulnerability. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(1), 1–10. 10.1007/s10865-006-9086-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 71–88. 10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel Lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385–409. 10.1086/261880 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blakely, J. (2020). How economics becomes ideology: The uses and abuses of rational choice theory. In P. Rona & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), Agency and causal explanation in economics (pp. 37–52). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-26114-6_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K.-K., & Chemonges-Nielson, Z. (2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 177–191. 10.1002/per.509 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonnefon, J. F., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (2012). The psychology of reasoning about preferences and unconsequential decisions. Synthese, 185(1), 27–41. 10.1007/s11229-011-9957-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bregant, J., Shaw, A., & Kinzler, K. D. (2016). Intuitive jurisprudence: Early reasoning about the functions of punishment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(4), 693–717. 10.1111/jels.12130 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T. (1984). Can we be scientific in applied social science? In R. F. Connor, D. G. Altman, & C. Jackson (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (pp. 26–48). Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carmichael, S., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Sanctions, perceived anger, and criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(4), 371–393. 10.1007/s10940-004-5869-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. Academic Press. 10.1016/C2013-0-10497-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooper, D. A., Connolly, T., & Kugler, T. (2015). Lay personality theories in interactive decisions: Strongly held, weakly supported. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(3), 201–213. 10.1002/bdm.1842 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duncan, T. A. (2021). More employers are secretly monitoring their employees. Mic. https://www.mic.com/life/companies-surveilling-workers First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eibach, R. P., & Libby, L. K. (2009). Ideology of the good old days: Exaggerated perceptions of moral decline and conservative politics. In J. T. JostA. C. KayH. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 402–423). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Franklin, B. (1976). [1733-1758] Poor Richard: The Almanacks for the Years 1733–1758. Paddington Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenglass, E. R., & Julkunen, J. (1989). Construct validity and sex differences in Cook-Medley hostility. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(2), 209–218. 10.1177/0146167217742886 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hakulinen, C., Jokela, M., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., Elovainio, M., Hintsa, T., Hutri-Kähönen, N., Viikari, J., Raitakari, O. T., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2013). Hostility and unemployment: A two-way relationship? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 153–160. 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.04.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heslin, P. A., Vandewalle, D. O. N., & Latham, G. P. (2006). Keen to help? Managers' implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 871–902. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00057.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(3), 333–342. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00058.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacoby, J., & Sassenberg, K. (2011). Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 180–190. 10.1002/ejsp.762 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kantor, J., Weise, K., & Ashford, G. (2021). The Amazon that customers don’t see. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/06/15/us/amazon-workers.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan, S. A., Bradley, J. C., & Ruscher, J. B. (2004). The inhibitory role of cynical disposition in the provision and receipt of social support: The case of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 122–1232. 10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kurman, J. (2011). What I do and what I think they would do: Social axioms and behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 25(6), 410–423. 10.1002/per.801 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In M. H. BazermanR. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 68–90). Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, R. S. J., & Hsiao, J. K. (2014). The relationships between transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, trust and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 5(3), 171–174. 10.1504/EJIM.2012.044759 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mackey, D. A., & Courtright, K. E. (2000). Assessing punitiveness among college students: A comparison of criminal justice majors with other majors. Criminal Justice Studies, 12(4), 423–441. 10.1080/1478601X.2000.9959561 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54(12), 1053–1060. 10.1016/S1529-2096(01)03013-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 53–62. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.53 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, E., & Zaki, J. (2023). Toward a social psychology of cynicism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(1), 1–3. 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neuvonen, E., Rusanen, M., Solomon, A., Ngandu, T., Laatikainen, T., Soininen, H., Kivipelto, M., & Tolppanen, A. M. (2014). Late-life cynical distrust, risk of incident dementia, and mortality in a population-based cohort. Neurology, 82(24), 2205–2212. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000528 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Lay theories of personality: Cornerstones of meaning in social cognition. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1069–1081. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00222.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. 10.5465/amr.1998.926617 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudert, S. C., Hales, A. H., & Büttner, C. M. (2021). Stay out of our office (vs. our pub): Target personality and situational context affect ostracism intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, Article 104142. 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104142 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Pirttila-Backman, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2011). Reciprocity of trust in the supervisor–subordinate relationship: The mediating role of autonomy and the sense of power. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(6), 755–778. 10.1080/1359432X.2010.507353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K., Sanders, J. D., Allred, K. D., & O'Keeffe, J. L. (1988). Cynical hostility at home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(4), 525–548. 10.1016/0092-6566(88)90008-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spiridonova, T., Stavrova, O., & van Beest, I. (2013). Cynical, but useful? A lay beliefs perspective on cynical leaders’ ability to prevent antisocial behavior at work [Data, materials]. https://osf.io/fcrs4 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., & Ehlebracht, D. (2016). Cynical beliefs about human nature and income: Longitudinal and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 116–132. 10.1037/pspp0000050 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., & Ehlebracht, D. (2019a). Broken bodies, broken spirits: How poor health contributes to a cynical worldview. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 52–71. 10.1002/per.2183 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., & Ehlebracht, D. (2019b). The cynical genius illusion: Exploring and debunking lay beliefs about cynicism and competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 254–269. 10.1177/0146167218783195 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., Ehlebracht, D., & Vohs, K. D. (2020). Victims, perpetrators, or both? The vicious cycle of disrespect and cynical beliefs about human nature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(9), 1736–1754. 10.1037/xge0000738 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., Evans, A. M., Sleegers, W., & van Beest, I. (2022). Examining the accuracy of lay beliefs about the effects of personality on prosocial behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(5), Article e2282. 10.1002/bdm.2282 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teunisse, A. K., Case, T. I., Fitness, J., & Sweller, N. (2020). I should have known better: Development of a self-report measure of gullibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(3), 408–423. 10.1177/0146167219858641 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., Heinze, L., Neufeld, J. E., Shorey, H. S., Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, D. E. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 313–359. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00311.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 145–161. 10.1111/1467-839X.00030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar