Cynical, But Useful?
A Lay Beliefs Perspective on Cynical Leaders’ Ability to Prevent Antisocial Behavior at Work
Abstract
Abstract: Cynicism – the belief that people are driven primarily by self-interest – has been predominantly associated with detrimental consequences for individuals and organizations. Less is known about its potentially positive implications. We investigated whether lay people consider cynicism helpful in preventing antisocial behavior and therefore see value in cynical leaders. We found that people viewed cynical (vs. trusting) leaders as better at detecting antisocial behavior and more punitive, and therefore, as better at preventing employees’ antisocial behavior (Study 1). Despite this, cynical (vs. trusting) leaders were less likely to be hired, were offered lower salaries, and were seen as less effective (Study 2). This aversion to cynical leaders was attenuated for jobs that emphasized the importance of preventing antisocial behavior (Study 3).
References
2018). Linking tolerance to workplace incivility, service innovative, knowledge hiding, and job search behavior: The mediating role of employee cynicism. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11(4), 298–320. 10.1111/ncmr.12136
(1991). Social cognition in cynical hostility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15(5), 399–412. 10.1007/BF01173034
(1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 449–469. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199709)18:5<449::AID-JOB808>3.0.CO;2-O
(2015). The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 296–307. 10.1002/per.1998
(2007). Hostility, anger, and marital adjustment: Concurrent and prospective associations with psychosocial vulnerability. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(1), 1–10. 10.1007/s10865-006-9086-z
(2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 71–88. 10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366
(1993). Nobel Lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385–409. 10.1086/261880
(2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
(2020). How economics becomes ideology: The uses and abuses of rational choice theory. In (Eds.), Agency and causal explanation in economics (pp. 37–52). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-26114-6_3
(2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 177–191. 10.1002/per.509
(2012). The psychology of reasoning about preferences and unconsequential decisions. Synthese, 185(1), 27–41. 10.1007/s11229-011-9957-x
(2016). Intuitive jurisprudence: Early reasoning about the functions of punishment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(4), 693–717. 10.1111/jels.12130
(1984). Can we be scientific in applied social science? In (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (pp. 26–48). Sage Publications.
(2004). Sanctions, perceived anger, and criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(4), 371–393. 10.1007/s10940-004-5869-y
(1970). Studies in machiavellianism. Academic Press. 10.1016/C2013-0-10497-7
(2015). Lay personality theories in interactive decisions: Strongly held, weakly supported. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(3), 201–213. 10.1002/bdm.1842
(2021). More employers are secretly monitoring their employees. Mic. https://www.mic.com/life/companies-surveilling-workers
(2009). Ideology of the good old days: Exaggerated perceptions of moral decline and conservative politics. In J. T. JostA. C. KayH. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 402–423). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.016
(1976). [1733-1758] Poor Richard: The Almanacks for the Years 1733–1758. Paddington Press.
(1989). Construct validity and sex differences in Cook-Medley hostility. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(2), 209–218. 10.1177/0146167217742886
(2013). Hostility and unemployment: A two-way relationship? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 153–160. 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.04.003
(2006). Keen to help? Managers' implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 871–902. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00057.x
(2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(3), 333–342. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00058.x
(2011). Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 180–190. 10.1002/ejsp.762
(2021). The Amazon that customers don’t see. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/06/15/us/amazon-workers.html
(2004). The inhibitory role of cynical disposition in the provision and receipt of social support: The case of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 122–1232. 10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.006
(2011). What I do and what I think they would do: Social axioms and behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 25(6), 410–423. 10.1002/per.801
(2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131
(1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In M. H. BazermanR. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 68–90). Sage Publications.
(2014). The relationships between transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, trust and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 5(3), 171–174. 10.1504/EJIM.2012.044759
(2000). Assessing punitiveness among college students: A comparison of criminal justice majors with other majors. Criminal Justice Studies, 12(4), 423–441. 10.1080/1478601X.2000.9959561
(1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54(12), 1053–1060. 10.1016/S1529-2096(01)03013-9
(1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 53–62. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.53
(2023). Toward a social psychology of cynicism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(1), 1–3. 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.009
(2014). Late-life cynical distrust, risk of incident dementia, and mortality in a population-based cohort. Neurology, 82(24), 2205–2212. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000528
(2009). Lay theories of personality: Cornerstones of meaning in social cognition. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1069–1081. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00222.x
(1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. 10.5465/amr.1998.926617
(2021). Stay out of our office (vs. our pub): Target personality and situational context affect ostracism intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, Article
(104142 . 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.1041422011). Reciprocity of trust in the supervisor–subordinate relationship: The mediating role of autonomy and the sense of power. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(6), 755–778. 10.1080/1359432X.2010.507353
(1988). Cynical hostility at home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(4), 525–548. 10.1016/0092-6566(88)90008-6
(2013). Cynical, but useful? A lay beliefs perspective on cynical leaders’ ability to prevent antisocial behavior at work [Data, materials]. https://osf.io/fcrs4
(2016). Cynical beliefs about human nature and income: Longitudinal and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 116–132. 10.1037/pspp0000050
(2019a). Broken bodies, broken spirits: How poor health contributes to a cynical worldview. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 52–71. 10.1002/per.2183
(2019b). The cynical genius illusion: Exploring and debunking lay beliefs about cynicism and competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 254–269. 10.1177/0146167218783195
(2020). Victims, perpetrators, or both? The vicious cycle of disrespect and cynical beliefs about human nature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(9), 1736–1754. 10.1037/xge0000738
(2022). Examining the accuracy of lay beliefs about the effects of personality on prosocial behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(5), Article
(e2282 . 10.1002/bdm.22822020). I should have known better: Development of a self-report measure of gullibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(3), 408–423. 10.1177/0146167219858641
(2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 313–359. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00311.x
(1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 145–161. 10.1111/1467-839X.00030
(