Reevaluating the Placebo Effect in Medical Practice
Abstract
Recent findings from placebo research corroborate the evidence that the placebo effect represents a promising model to shed new light on brain-mind-body interactions. In particular, this research has partially elucidated the role of how patients’ expectations and the quality of physician-patient communication can influence the efficacy of interventions and overall clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the study of the placebo effect should be incorporated in the core clinical practice curriculum of all health practitioners. While the growing knowledge about the placebo effect points to it being an irreducible primary reality of medical practice, an ethical analysis aimed at avoiding the misuse of placebos and maximizing beneficial placebo effects is needed.
References
1973). The doctor-patient relationship revisited. An analysis of the placebo effect. Annals of Internal Medicine, 78, 595–598.
(2001). Response variability to analgesics: A role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids. Pain, 90, 205–215.
(2008). Mechanisms of placebo and placebo-related effects across diseases and treatments. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 48, 33–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094711
(2011). The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: Imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil. Science Translational Medicine, 3, 70ra14 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001244
(1980). Placebo and the philosophy of medicine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1997). Placebo response, sustained partnership, and emotional resilience in practice. American Board of Family Medicine, 10, 72–74.
(2011). Lessons from recent research about the placebo effect – from art to science. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 2612–2613. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1850
(2012). Nocebo effects, patient-clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307, 567–568. doi: 307/6/567 [pii] 10.1001/jama.2012.115
(2013). Placebo analgesia: Psychological and neurobiological mechanisms. Pain, 154, 511–514. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.002
(2004). Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurology, 3, 679–684. doi: S1474442204009081 [pii] 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00908-1
(2013). Placebo and nocebo: Ethical challenges and solutions. In , Placebo and pain: From bench to bedside (pp. 277–286). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
(2011). Harnessing the placebo effect: The need for translational research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1922–1930. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0399
(2005). Placebos in medicine: Medical paradoxes need disentangling. British Medical Journal, 330, 45 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7481.45-a
(2013). The placebo response in medicine: Minimize, maximize or personalize? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 12, 191–204. doi: 10.1038/nrd3923
(2010). Frequency and circumstances of placebo use in clinical practice – a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Medicine, 8, 15 doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-15
(2013). Placebo use in the United Kingdom: Results from a national survey of primary care practitioners. PLoS One, 8, e58247 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058247
(2003). The use of placebo interventions in medical practice – a national questionnaire survey of Danish clinicians. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 26, 153–165.
(2011). Reframing placebo in research and practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1896–1904. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0405
(2010). Placebos without deception: A randomized controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One, 5, e15591 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015591
(2008). Components of placebo effect: Randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. British Medical Journal, 336, 999–1003. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39524.439618.25
(2014). Placebo analgesia: Clinical applications. Pain, 155, 1055–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.007
(2011). Placebo interventions, placebo effects and clinical practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1905–1912. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0383
(2004). Effects of perceived treatment on quality of life and medical outcomes in a double-blind placebo surgery trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 412–420. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.412
(2011). The placebo effect: Advances from different methodological approaches. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 16117–16124. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4099-11.2011
(2012). Widespread use of pure and impure placebo interventions by GPs in Germany. Family Practice, 29, 79–85. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr045
(2009). The legitimacy of placebo treatments in clinical practice: Evidence and ethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 9, 39–47. doi: 10.1080/15265160903316263
(2008). Prescribing “placebo treatments”: Results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologists. British Medical Journal, 337, a1938 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1938
(2011). Active albuterol or placebo, sham acupuncture, or no intervention in asthma. New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 119–126. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103319
(