Skip to main content
Original Article

Measuring a Mastery Goal Structure Using the TARGET Framework

Development and Validation of a Classroom Goal Structure Questionnaire

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000277

Abstract. In prior research, goal structures have been measured as macroscopic and holistic constructs referring to all activities in the classroom setting associated with learning and performing on a meta-level. A more comprehensive approach for identifying concrete classroom structures that should foster students’ mastery goals is provided by the multidimensional TARGET framework with its six instructional dimensions (Task, Autonomy, Recognition, Grouping, Evaluation, Time). However, measurement instruments assessing students’ perceptions of all TARGET dimensions are largely lacking. The main aim of this study was to develop and validate a new student questionnaire for comprehensive assessment of the perceived TARGET classroom structure (the Goal Structure Questionnaire – GSQ). Scales were constructed using a rational-empirical strategy based on classical conceptions of the TARGET dimensions and prior empirical research. The instrument was tested in a study using a sample of 1,080 secondary school students. Findings indicate that the scales are reliable, internally valid, and externally valid in terms of relationships with students’ achievement goals. More concretely, analyses revealed that the TARGET mastery goal structure positively predicts mastery goals, performance approach goals, and an incremental implicit theory of intelligence. No associations were found with performance avoidance goals.

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergsmann, E., Lüftenegger, M., Jöstl, G., Schober, B. & Spiel, C. (2013). The role of classroom structure in fostering students’ school functioning: A comprehensive and application-oriented approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.05.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 879–896. doi: 10.1037/a0015945 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Church, M. A., Eliott, A. J. & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 45–54. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.43 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. ElliotC. S. DweckEds., Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epstein, J. L. (1988). Effective schools or effective students: Dealing with diversity. In R. HaskinsD. MacRaeEds., Policies for America’s public schools: Teacher, equity and indicators (pp. 89–126). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Federici, R. A., Skaalvik, E. M. & Tangen, T. N. (2015). Students’ perceptions of the goal structure in mathematics classrooms: Relations with goal orientations, mathematics anxiety, and help-seeking behavior. International Education Studies, 8, 146–158. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n3p146 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, M. H., Duke, B. L. & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackel, T. S., Jones, M. H., Carbonneau, K. J. & Mueller, C. E. (2016). Re-examining achievement goal instrumentation: Convergent validity of AGQ and PALS. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi: 10.1037/a0018947 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330–358. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.0993 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lau, K. L. & Lee, J. (2008). Examining Hong Kong students’ achievement goals and their relations with students’ perceived classroom environment and strategy use. Educational Psychology, 28, 357–372. doi: 10.1080/01443410701612008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lau, S. & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 15–29. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.15 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, M. & Bong, M. (2016). In their own words: Reasons underlying the achievement striving of students in schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 274–294. doi: 10.1037/edu0000048 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Middleton, M. J., Ciani, K. D., Easter, M. A., O’Keefe, P. A. & Zusho, A. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance approach and performance avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47, 281–301. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722515 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A. & Trautwein, U. (2011). A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent contextual models: Accuracy-bias trade-offs in full and partial error correction models. Psychological Methods, 16, 444–467. doi: 10.1037/a0024376 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U. & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lüftenegger, M., van de Schoot, R., Schober, B., Finsterwald, M. & Spiel, C. (2014). Promotion of students’ mastery goal orientations: Does TARGET work? Educational Psychology, 34, 451–469. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.814189 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maehr, M. L. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In C. AmesR. AmesEds., Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 299–315). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maehr, M. L. & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M. & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., … Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61–75. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1041 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murayama, K. & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432–447. doi: 10.1037/a0014221 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O. & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2015). Mplus (Version 7. 4), Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C. & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58. doi: 10.1086/499692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulick, I., Watermann, R. & Nückles, M. (2011). Zielorientierungen und schulische Leistungen am Grundschulübergang [Achievement goals and school achievement during the transition from elementary to secondary school]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 39, 365–384. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schober, B., Lüftenegger, M., Wagner, P., Finsterwald, M. & Spiel, C. (2013). Facilitating lifelong learning in school-age learners. European Psychologist, 18, 114–125. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000129 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schwinger, M. & Stiensmeier‐Pelster, J. (2011). Performance‐approach and performance‐avoidance classroom goals and the adoption of personal achievement goals. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 680–699. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02012.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538646 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spinath, B. & Schöne, C. (2003). Die Skalen zur Erfassung subjektiver Überzeugungen zu Bedingungen von Erfolg in Lern- und Leistungskontexten (SE-SÜBELLKO). In J. Stiensmeier-PelsterF. RheinbergEds., Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept [Diagnosis of motivation and self-concept] (pp. 15–27). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spinath, B., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Schöne, C. & Dickhäuser, O. (2002). Die Skalen zur Erfassung von Lern- und Leistungsmotivation (SELLMO) [Scales for the assessment of learning and performance motivation (SELLMO)]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G. & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 196–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tapola, A. & Niemivirta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 291–312. doi: 10.1348/000709907X205272 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Urdan, T. (2004). Using multiple methods to assess students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures. European Psychologist, 9, 222–231. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.9.4.222 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Urdan, T., Midgley, C. & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101–122. doi: 10.3102/00028312035001101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structure and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wormington, S. V. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2016). A new look at multiple goal pursuit: The promise of a person-centered approach. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10648–016-9358-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar