Skip to main content
Original Article

A Fixed Mindset Leads to Negative Affect

The Relations Between Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Subjective Well-Being

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000290

Abstract. The way individuals think about their intelligence (i.e., implicit theories of intelligence) powerfully shapes learning processes. However, not much is known about how implicit theories of intelligence are associated with subjective well-being. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between implicit theories of intelligence and subjective well-being as indexed by life satisfaction, positive affect, and (low levels of) negative affect. Study 1, a cross-sectional study, showed that entity theory of intelligence was negatively associated with life satisfaction and positively associated with negative affect. Study 2, a cross-lagged longitudinal study, showed that implicit theories and certain dimensions of subjective well-being were reciprocally related. Time 1 entity theory positively predicted subsequent negative affect, while Time 1 positive affect was negatively associated with T2 entity theory. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

References

  • Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bernardo, A. B. I., Ganotice, F. A. & King, R. B. (2015). Motivation gap and achievement gap between public and private high schools in the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 657–667. doi: 10.1007/s40299-014-0213-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burkholder, G. J. & Harlow, L. L. (2009). An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 465–486. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M. & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L. & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894–908. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. The American Psychologist, 67, 590–597. doi: 10.1037/a0029541 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dinger, F. C. & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Does implicit theory of intelligence cause achievement goals? Evidence from an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.03.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diseth, A., Meland, E. & Breidablik, H. J. (2014). Self-beliefs among students: Grade level and gender differences in self-esteem, self-efficacy and implicit theories of intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y. & Hong, Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Enders, C. K. (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8, 322–337. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.322 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flook, L. & Fuligni, A. J. (2008). Family and school spillover in adolescents’ daily lives. Child Development, 79, 776–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01157.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In E. Ashby PlantP. G. DevineEds., Advances on experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Burlington, MA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gaudiano, B. A., Miller, I. W. & Herbert, J. D. (2007). The treatment of psychotic major depression: Is there a role for adjunctive psychotherapy? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 76, 271–277. doi: 10.1159/000104703 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goetz, T., Hall, N. C., Frenzel, A. C. & Pekrun, R. (2006). A hierarchical conceptualization of enjoyment in students. Learning and Instruction, 16, 323–338. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harter, S. (1993). Causes and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In R. F. BaumesiterEd., Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 87–116). New York, NY: Plenum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Measuring model fit. In R. H. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140. doi: 10.2307/2787065 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D. & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., Ganotice, F. A. & Villarosa, J. (2015). Positive affect catalyzes engagement: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, R. B., McInerney, D. M. & Watkins, D. A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 814–819. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klug, H. J. P. & Maier, G. W. (2015). Linking goal progress and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 37–65. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9493-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighting the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A. & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405–416. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7"10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C. & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal models: The direction of causality in multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 509–527. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.509 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moser, J. S., Schroder, H. S., Heeter, C., Moran, T. M. & Lee, Y.-H. (2011). Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterior adjustments. Psychological Science, 22, 1484–1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797611419520 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ng, Z. J., Huebner, S. E. & Hills, K. E. (2015). Life satisfaction and academic performance in early adolescents: Evidence for reciprocal association. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 479–491. doi: 10.1037/spq0000061 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R. & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 461–474. doi: 10.1080/00313830500267838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.643265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R. W. & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313–336. doi: 10.1080/15298860290106805 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S. & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14, 227–234. doi: 10.1037/a0035490 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schleider, J. L., Abel, M. & Weisz, J. R. (2015). Implicit theories and youth mental health problems: A random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.11.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schone, C., Tandler, S. S. & Steinsmeier-Pelster, J. (2015). Contingent self-esteem and vulnerability to depression: Academic contingent self-esteem predicts depressive symptoms in students. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01573 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S. & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61, 121–145. doi: 10.1023/A:1021326822957 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar