Abstract
Abstract. The increasing usage of new technologies implies changes for personality research. First, human behavior becomes measurable by digital data, and second, digital manifestations to some extent replace conventional behavior in the analog world. This offers the opportunity to investigate personality traits by means of digital footprints. In this context, the investigation of the personality trait sensation seeking attracted our attention as objective behavioral correlates have been missing so far. By collecting behavioral markers (e.g., communication or app usage) via Android smartphones, we examined whether self-reported sensation seeking scores can be reliably predicted. Overall, 260 subjects participated in our 30-day real-life data logging study. Using a machine learning approach, we evaluated cross-validated model fit based on how accurate sensation seeking scores can be predicted in unseen samples. Our findings highlight the potential of mobile sensing techniques in personality research and show exemplarily how prediction approaches can help to foster an increased understanding of human behavior.
References
2015). Beware of r 2: Simple, unambiguous assessment of the prediction accuracy of qsar and qspr models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 55, 1316–1322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00206
(2003). Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman personality questionnaire (ZKPQ-III-R): A study of a shortened form. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00097-1
(2016). How age and gender affect smartphone usage. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 9–12). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2971451
(2011). Manual Big-Five Structure Inventory BFSI. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried.
(2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
(2003). Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Normen einer deutschsprachigen Fassung der Sensation Seeking-Skalen, Form V
([Psychometric properties and norms of a German version of the Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V] . Diagnostica, 49, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.612007). To be, or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00384.x
(2016). mlr: Machine learning in r. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 1–5.Retrieved from http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-066.html
(2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
(2005). Towards customized emotional design: An explorative study of user personality and user interface skin preferences. Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 107–114). Athens, Greece: University of Athens.
(2015). Trajectories of depression: Unobtrusive monitoring of depressive states by means of smartphone mobility traces analysis. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 1293–1304). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805845
(2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
(2016). A practical guide to big data research in psychology. Psychological Methods, 21, 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000111
(2015). Xgboost: Extreme gradient boosting, R Package Version 0.4-2., 1–4. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xgboost
(2016). Analyzing big data in psychology: A split/analyze/meta-analyze approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00738
(2011). Who’s who with Big-Five: Analyzing and classifying personality traits with smartphones. 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) (pp. 29–36). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2011.29
(2013). Mining large-scale smartphone data for personality studies. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17, 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0490-1
(2005). Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37, 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006
(2016). Die deutsche Version des Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2)
([German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-2)] . Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis2472013). Predicting personality using novel mobile phone-based metrics. International conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling, and prediction (pp. 48–55). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
(2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion
(2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451
(2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1–22.
(1998). Embedding sensation seeking within the big three. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00096-8
(2010). Sensation seeking in males involved in recreational high risk sports. Biology of Sport, 27, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.919331
(2016). Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650285
(1998). Sensation seeking among high-and low-risk sports participants. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1063–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00081-6
(2013). An introduction to statistical learning, Vol. 112, New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
(2003). John Tukey and robustness. Statistical Science, 18, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1076102419
(2004). Kernlab – an S4 package for Kernel methods in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 11, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v011.i09
(2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 5802–5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110
(2013). Applied predictive modeling, Vol. 26, New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
(2013). Development and validation of a Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). PLoS One, 8, e56936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056936
(2008). Sensation seeking and tourism: Tourist role, perception of risk and destination choice. Tourism Management, 29, 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.08.002
(2008).
(Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, addiction: Symptoms and patterns of cell phone use . In E. A. KonijnM. A. TanisS. UtzA. LindenEds., Mediated interpersonal communications (pp. 359–381). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
(2002). Investigating the roles of gambling interest and impulsive sensation seeking on consumer enjoyment of promotional games. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.1.53
(2015). Smartphone usage in the 21st century: Who is active on Whatsapp? BMC Research Notes, 8, 331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1280-z
(2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
. (2017). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
(2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00067-9
(1993). Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291267
(2015). Mobile phone sensor correlates of depressive symptom severity in daily-life behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17, e175. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4273
(2016). Mlr tutorial. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.06146.pdf
(2018, March). Digital footprints of sensation seeking: A traditional concept in the big data era. Open Science Framework. Retrieved from https://osf.io/wg38b/
(2017). Personality traits predict smartphone usage. European Journal of Personality, 31, 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2113
(2018, March). The phonestudy project. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ut42y
(2008). Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307
(2015).
(Personality and Recommender Systems . In F. RicciL. RokachB. ShapiraEds., Recommender systems handbook (pp. 715–739). Boston, MA: Springer.2009). Relationship between circadian typology and big five personality domains. Chronobiology International, 26, 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520902750995
(1999). An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.788640
(2004). Friends, porn, and punk: Sensation seeking in personal relationships, internet activities, and music preference among college students. Adolescence, 39, 189–201.
(2017). Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
(2012). Measuring individual regularity in human visiting patterns. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom) (pp. 117–122). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.93
(2017). Caret: Classification and regression training. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret
(1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 67–82. https://doi.org/1089-778X(97)03422-X
(2017). ranger: A fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. Journal of Statistical Software, 77, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i01
(2010). Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001
(2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393
(2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1036–1040. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418680112
(2009). Mediational effects of sensation seeking on the age and financial risk-taking relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 917–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.016
(2009). Modeling socially desirable responding and its effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408324469
(2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67, 301–320. https://doi.org/1369-7412/05/67301
(1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2002).
(Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factorial model . In B. De RaadM. PeruginiEds., Big Five Assessment (pp. 377–396). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.2015).
(Measures of sensation seeking . In G.J. BoyleD.H. SaklofskeG. MatthewsEds., Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 352–380). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139
(