Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Experience Matters

Effects of (In)Congruent Prompts About Word Frequency on Judgments of Learning

Published Online:October 30, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000423

Abstract

Abstract. The present study tested if word frequency effects on judgments of learning (JOLs) are exclusively due to beliefs or if the direct experience with the items also plays a role. Across four experiments, participants read prompts about the frequency of the words (high/low), which could be congruent/incongruent with the words’ actual frequency. They made pre-study JOLs (except Experiment 1b), immediate JOLs, and completed a recall test. If experience drives the effect, JOLs should be based on actual word frequency rather than the prompts. Results showed higher pre-study JOLs for prompts of high frequency, but higher immediate JOLs for high-frequency words regardless of the prompt, suggesting an effect of direct experience with the words. In Experiments 2 and 3, we manipulated participants’ beliefs, finding a small effect of beliefs on JOLs. We conclude that, regarding word frequency, direct experience with the items seems more relevant than beliefs when making immediate JOLs.

References

  • Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90016-8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Benjamin, A. S. (2003). Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory. Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194388 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bein, O., Livneh, N., Reggev, N., Gilead, M., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Maril, A. (2015). Delineating the effect of semantic congruency on episodic memory: The role of integration and relatedness. PLoS One, 10(2), e0115624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115624 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Besken, M. (2016). Picture-perfect is not perfect for metamemory: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with degraded images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(9), 1417–1433. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000246 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blake, A. B., & Castel, A. D. (2018). On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief. Acta Psychologica, 186, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727521 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiacconi, C. M., & Dollois, M. A. (2020). Does word frequency influence judgments of learning (JOLs)? A meta-analytic review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000206 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frank, D. J., & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2017). More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000332 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hourihan, K. L., Fraundorf, S. H., & Benjamin, A. S. (2017). The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13421-016-0646-3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, X., Li, T., Zheng, J., Su, N., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2015). How much do metamemory beliefs contribute to the font-size effect in judgments of learning? PLoS One, 10(11), e0142351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142351 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jia, X., Li, P., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, W., Cao, L., & Li, W. (2016). The effect of word frequency on judgments of learning: Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01995 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Luna, K., Nogueira, M., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2019). Words in larger font are perceived as more important: Explaining the belief that font size affects memory. Memory, 27(4), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1529797 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mendes, P. S., Luna, K., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2019). Word frequency effects on judgments of learning: More than just beliefs. The Journal of General Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2019.1706073 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mueller, M. L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2014). The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mueller, M., & Dunlosky, J. (2017). How beliefs can impact judgments of learning: Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.008 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Price, J., & Harrison, A. (2017). Examining what prestudy and immediate judgments of learning reveal about the bases of metamemory judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.003 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Judgments of learning: Methods, data, and theory. In J. DunloskyS. TauberEds., The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 90–117). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.4 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013684 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schilling, H. E., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schulman, A. I. (1974). Memory for words recently classified. Memory & Cognition, 2(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197491 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soares, A. P., Costa, A., Machado, J., Comesaña, M., & Oliveira, H. M. (2017). The Minho Word Pool: Norms for imageability, concreteness, and subjective frequency for 3,800 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0767-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soares, A. P., Iriarte, A., Almeida, J. J., Simões, A., Costa, A., França, P., Machado, J., & Comesaña, M. (2014). Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): Uma nova medida de frequência lexical do Português Europeu contemporâneo. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722014000100013 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soderstrom, N. C., Yue, C. L., & Bjork, E. L. (2016). Metamemory and education. In J. DunloskyS. TauberEds., The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 197–215). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.6 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Susser, J. A., & Mulligan, N. W. (2015). The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1014–1019. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0768-1 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Undorf, M., & Bröder, A. (2020). Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819882308 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Undorf, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2015). The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency. Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0479-x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Undorf, M., & Zimdahl, M. F. (2019). Metamemory and memory for a wide range of font sizes: What is the contribution of perceptual fluency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000571 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Undorf, M., Zimdahl, M. F., & Bernstein, D. M. (2017). Perceptual fluency contributes to effects of stimulus size on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yang, C., Huang, T. S.-T., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). Perceptual fluency affects judgments of learning: The font size effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.11.005 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar