Design of a Primary Flight Display to Avoid Decelerating Below the Minimum Safe Operating Speed
Abstract
Abstract. Analysis of recent airliner accidents and incidents identified a class of events in which structurally, mechanically, and electronically sound aircraft decelerated through the minimum safe operating speed for the phase of flight to the stick-shaker activation speed. Despite the differences in the sequences of events, a subset of the incidents and accidents had one thing in common – the automation was no longer actively controlling to the airspeed target. This article describes the accident scenarios and design of a modification to the airspeed tape on the primary flight display to explicitly annunciate the absence of active speed control. An experiment to evaluate the efficacy of the enhanced airspeed tape showed faster pilot response time but no differences in correct pilot response.
References
(2013). Study on aeroplane state awareness during go-around. Bourget, France: Bureau d’Enquetes et d’Analyses pour a securite de l’aviation civile.
. (2013). ASHWG draft report–low airspeed alerting. Phase 2 task (retrofit applications) – Revision A. Avionics System Harmonization Working Group (ASHWG). Tasking Notice 77 FR 11844 (March 3, 2011).
(1998). Aiding vertical guidance understanding. NASA/TM 1998–112217. Moffet Field, CA: NASA Ames.
(1999). In R. JensenEd.,
Mode awareness in a modern glass cockpit attention allocation to mode information . Proceedings of the 1999 Ohio State University Aviation Psychology Conference. Dayton, OH: Ohio State University.. (2015). Guidance material and best practices for the implementation of upset prevention and recovery training. Montreal, Canada/Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
(2014, August). Flight-deck strategies and outcomes when flying schedule-matching descents. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences (AIAA 2013-4537). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4537
(2016, May). Functional complexity failures, automation surprises. Presentation of 2016 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, USA.
(2001). Analysis of pilots’ monitoring and performance on an automated flight deck. Paper Presentation at the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, Ohio State University, OH, USA. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/37b9/01d0b89675ce562b8f9222fd9c39511e9db2.pdf
(2014, April). Controlled flight into stall (CFIS): Functional complexity failures and automation surprises. Paper Presentation at the 2014 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS) Conference, Dulles, Virginia, USA.
