Skip to main content
Original Article

Psychometric Properties of the German Short Version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000067

Abstract.Background: Higher education is a challenging context in which students – particularly those endowed with a small array of resources – are susceptible to suffer from burnout. To screen, identify, and support students that are at risk of burnout, psychometrically robust instruments are essential. To this end, we extended the validation of the German short version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey (MBI-SS-KV) that allows measuring burnout among German-speaking university students. Method: We conducted a longitudinal study and analyzed the factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, and convergent as well as discriminant validity of the MBI-SS-KV in a sample of German university students (N = 1,435). Results: Our results replicated the original three-factor structure of the MBI-SS-KV. Yet, a bi-factor structure of the MBI-SS-KV – composed of a general factor (i.e., student burnout) and three domain-specific factors (i.e., emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy) – revealed a comparable fit and was used for further analyses due to theoretical and methodological advantages. Based on the bi-factor structure of the MBI-SS-KV, nested models with increasing invariance constraints provided support for measurement invariance of this instrument across female and male university students and across time. Besides, the average variance extracted estimates and the comparisons of these estimates with shared variances demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity of the factors emotional exhaustion and cynicism, but not for the factor reduced professional efficacy. Conclusion: To sum up, we found that the MBI-SS-KV is a reliable and for the most part valid instrument for the assessment of student burnout in German higher education.

References

  • Alarcon, G. M., Edwards, J. M., & Menke, L. E. (2011). Student burnout and engagement: A test of the conservation of resources theory. The Journal of Psychology, 145(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2011.555432 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Balkis, M. (2013). The relationship between academic procrastination and students’ burnout. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education]. 28(1), 53–63. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (Vol. 6). Multivariate software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1998). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102250225 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deary, I. J., Watson, R., & Hogston, R. (2003). A longitudinal cohort study of burnout and attrition in nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02674.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dyrbye, L. N., Massie, F. S., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Power, D., Durning, S. J., Thomas, M. R., Moutier, C., Satele, D., Sloan, J., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2010). Relationship between burnout and professional conduct and attitudes among US medical students. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(11), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1318 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Massie, F. S., Power, D. V., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Durning, S., Moutier, C., Szydlo, D. W., Novotny, P. J, Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2008). Burnout and suicidal ideation among US medical students. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149(5), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-5-200809020-00008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis, Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faye-Dumanget, C., Carré, J., Le Borgne, M., & Boudoukha, P. A. H. (2017). French validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey (MBI-SS). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(6), 1247–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12771 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galán, F., Sanmartín, A., Polo, J., & Giner, L. (2011). Burnout risk in medical students in Spain using the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(4), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0623-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gumz, A., Erices, R., Brähler, E., & Zenger, M. (2013). Faktorstruktur und Gütekriterien der deutschen Übersetzung des Maslach-Burnout-Inventars für Studierende von Schaufeli et al. (MBI-SS).[Factorial structure and psychometric criteria of the German translation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Version by Schaufeli et al. (MBI-SS)]. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 63(02), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1323695 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, Q., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey in China. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.394-408 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, E. R., Shanafelt, T. D., Hasan, O., Satele, D. V., & Dyrbye, L. N. (2016). Burnout and alcohol abuse/dependence among US medical students. Academic Medicine, 91(9), 1251–1256. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001138 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, S. H., & Huang, Y. C. (2014). Life stress and academic burnout. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514651 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mäkikangas, A., Hätinen, M., Kinnunen, U., & Pekkonen, M. (2011). Longitudinal factorial invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey among employees with job-related psychological health problems. Stress and Health, 27(4), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1381 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal stability of latent means and individual differences: A unified approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(4), 317–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519409539984 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mazurkiewicz, R., Korenstein, D., Fallar, R., & Ripp, J. (2012). The prevalence and correlations of medical student burnout in the pre-clinical years: A cross-sectional study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 17(2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2011.597770 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment, Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mokgele, K. R., & Rothmann, S. (2014). A structural model of student well-being. South African Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246314541589 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moneta, G. B. (2011). Need for achievement, burnout, and intention to leave: Testing an occupational model in educational settings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnaly, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Portoghese, I., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., Galletta, M., Porru, F., D’Aloja, E., Finco, G., & Campagna, M. (2018). Measuring burnout among university students: Factorial validity, invariance, and latent profiles of the Italian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Student Survey (MBI-SS). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reis, D., Xanthopoulou, D., & Tsaousis, I. (2015). Measuring job and academic burnout with the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI): Factorial invariance across samples and countries. Burnout Research, 2(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2014.11.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, T. G., Roberts, R. M., & Sarris, A. (2019). The effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of a dialectical behaviour therapy skills training group in reducing burnout and psychological distress in psychology trainees: A pilot study. Australian Psychologist, 54(4), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12389 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey. In C. MaslachS. E. JacksonM. P. LeiterEds., The Maslach Burnout Inventory – Test Manual (3rd ed., pp. 19–26). Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: Common ground and worlds apart. Work & Stress, 19(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500385913 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schnettler, T., Bobe, J., Scheunemann, A., Fries, S., & Grunschel, C. (2020). Is it still worth it? Applying expectancy-value theory to investigate the intraindividual motivational process of forming intentions to drop out from university. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09822-w First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sörbom, D. (1975). Detection of correlated errors in longitudinal data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1975.tb00558.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stallman, H. M. (2010). Psychological distress in university students: A comparison with general population data. Australian Psychologist, 45(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2010.482109 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, M. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. BryantM. WindleS. G. WestEds., The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10222-009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wörfel, F., Gusy, B., Lohman, K., & Kleiber, D. (2015). Validation of the German Short Version of the Maslach-Burnout – Inventory for Students (MBI-SS KV). Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 23(4), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000146 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar