Abstract
The present study explored how Turkish women in squatter communities on the fringes of an urban center positioned themselves in talk about family violence. Women’s talk revealed their interpretative repertoires with respect to intrafamily violence and power relations, how they constructed identities as wives and mothers, and how they envisioned alternative, more egalitarian social relations. Three focus groups, each comprising 10 women from Saraycık, a poor neighborhood of Ankara, met for an hour once every week for a period of 9 weeks. Six questions about intrafamily violence provoked conversations about power relations and violence with their children and husbands. Transcriptions of these conversations were analyzed for manifest content, latent content, interpretative repertoires, and the functions served by the interpretative repertoires. On the basis of the categorization, I identified the complexity of women’s positions, particularly with respect to their children as both the central meaning of life and children as getting on women’s nerves. Many interpretations placed blame on a member of the family—the woman herself, her children, or husband. Some women envisioned an alternative future that would be achieved through education, employment, and the exercise of agency. The findings imply that the constructed wife and mother identities of Turkish women in the economically vulnerable urban squatter settlements include tension and complex experiences that are in flux as the women imagine other possibilities.
References
(2004). Beden, Emek, Tarih. Diyalektik Bir Feminizm için. [
Body, labor and history: Implications for a dialectical feminism ]. İstanbul: Pusula Yayıncılık, Ltd.(2010). The prevalence of domestic violence against women among a group of women: Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 449–460. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9306-8
(2009). Violence against women in Turkey. A nationwide survey. İstanbul: Punto Publishing Solutions.
(2003). Discourse analysis means doinganalysis: A critiqueofsixanalyticshortcomings. Retrieved from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002-paper.html
(2004). Key success factors for women in management in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 453–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00180.x
(2011).
Discourse and identity construction . In S. J. SchwartzK. LuyckyV. L. Vignolas (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 177–199). Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8(2005). Poverty and social policy in contemporary Turkey. Paper presented at the Boğaziçi University Social Policy Forum.Retrieved from http://www.spf.boun.edu.tr/docs/WP-Bugra-Keyder.pdf
(2008). Maternal punishment practices in a rural area of Turkey. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34, 180–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00780.x
(1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
(1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
(2001). The politics of squatter (gecekondu) studies in Turkey: The changing representations of rural migrants in the academic discourse. Urban Studies, 38, 983–1002. doi: 10.1080/00420980120051620
(1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169. doi: 10.3102/0091732X023001119
(2008). The generalizability of discursive research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 265–275. doi: 10.1080/14780880802465890
(2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
(2006). ‘Yoksul Kesimdeki Ergenlerin Sosyal Psikolojik Açıdan Güçlendirilmesi’ (
The social psychological empowerment of the adolescents in poor districts ). Ankara: Tubitak Sobag. Report No. 104.(2003). Intrafamily aggression in Turkey: Frequency, instigation and acceptance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 163–184. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598438
(2009). Domestic violence against women in Turkey (National Report T. R. Prime Ministry Directorate General on the Status of Women). Ankara: Elma Teknik Basım. doi: 10.1177/1077801213486258
(1998). Kültürel Psikoloji: Kültür Bağlamında İnsan ve Aile [
Cultural psychology: The individual and the family within the context of culture ]. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.(2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422. doi: 10.1177/0022022105275959
(1995). A multipurpose model of nonformal education: The mother-child education programme. Retrieved from http://www.ecdgroup.com
(1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society: Special Issue to Honor Jessie Bernard, 2, 274–290. doi: 10.1177/089124388002003004
(1995).
Ataerkil örüntüler: Türk toplumunda erkek egemenliğinin çözümlenmesine yönelik notlar . Ş. Tekeli (Ed.), 1980′ler Türkiye’sinde Kadın Bakış Açısından Kadınlar [Patriarchal patterns: Notes on the analysis of male dominance in Turkey . In Ş. Tekeli (Ed.),Women from the perspective of women in Turkey during 1980s (pp. 38–52). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.(1997).
Gendering the modern on missing dimensions in the study of Turkish Modernity . In S. BozdoğanR. Kasaba (Eds.), Rethinking modernity and national identity in Turkey (pp. 113–132). Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.(2007). Domestic violence against women: A field study in Turkey. The Social Science Journal, 44, 698–720. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2007.10.016
(2009).
Designing a qualitative study . In L. BickmanD. J. Rog (Eds.), The Sage handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 214–253). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2005). A postmodern approach to women’s use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 323–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00226.x
(2005). Türkiye’de Yoksulluk ve Yoksulluk Düşüncesi. B. Ülmanİ. Akça (Ed.), İktisat, Siyaset, Devlet Üzerine Yazılar (Prof. Dr. Kemali Saybaşılı’ya Armağan) (199–221). [
Poverty and the concept of poverty in Turkey ]. In B. Ülmanİ. Akça (Eds.), Papers on the economy, the politics and the State İstanbul: Bağlam.(2008).
Discursive constructionism . In J. A. HolsteinJ. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–293). New York: The Guilford Press.(1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publication.
(2005).
Interpersonal schemas: Clinical theory, research and implications . In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 359–387). New York; London: The Guilford Press.(2000).
Writing the usual love story: The fashioning of conjugal and national subjects in Turkey . In V. A. Goddard (Ed.), Gender, agency and change (pp. 250–272). London: Routledge.. (2010). Türkiye’de Çocuk İstismarı ve Aile içi Şiddet Araştırması (
Research on child abuse and domestic violence in Turkey: Summary report ). Retrieved from http://panel.unicef.org.tr/vera/app/var/files/0/cocuk-istismari-raporu-eng.pdf(2008). Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Historical Social Research, 33, 224–251.
(1994).
Women and fundamentalism: The case of Turkey. Identity politics and women’s ethnicity . In V. M. Moghadam (Ed.), Identity politics and women: Cultural reassertions and feminisms in international perspective (pp. 293–306). Boulder: Westview Press.(1994). Money makes us relatives: Women’s labor in urban Turkey. Austin: The University of Texas Press. doi: 10.4324/9780203240427
(2013). Muslim nationalism and the new Turks. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
(2006). Türkiye’de muhafazakarlık, aile, din, Batı: ilk sonuçlar üzerine genel değerlendirme. İstanbul: Açık Toplum Enstitüsü ve Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. Kamuoyu araştırması. Infakto Research Workshop. [
Conservatism, family and religion in Turkey: An evaluation on the preliminary findings ]. İstanbul: Open Society Institute and Boğaziçi University. Public Opinion Research by Infakto Research Workshop.
