Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

Psychometrical Properties of a French Version of the General Self-Efficacy Short Scale (ASKU)

Published Online:September 17, 2019https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000233

Abstract

Abstract. General self-efficacy is a central personality trait often evaluated in surveys as context variable. It can be interpreted as a personal coping resource reflecting individual belief in one’s overall competence to perform across a variety of situations. The German-language Allgemeine-Selbstwirksamkeit-Kurzskala (ASKU) is a reliable and valid instrument to assess this disposition in the German-speaking countries based on a three-item equation. This study develops a French version of the ASKU and tests this French version for measurement invariance compared to the original ASKU. A reliable and valid French instrument would make it easy to collect data in the French-speaking countries and allow comparisons between the French and German results. Data were collected on a sample of 1,716 adolescents. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a good fit for a single-factor model of the data (in total, French, and German version). Additionally, construct validity was assessed by elucidating intercorrelations between the ASKU and different factors that should theoretically be related to ASKU. Furthermore, we confirmed configural and metric as well as scalar invariance between the different language versions, meaning that all forms of statistical comparison between the developed French version and the original German version are allowed.

References

  • Abdallah, A. B., Obeidat, B. Y., Aqqad, N. O., Al Janini, M. N. K., & Dahiyat, S. E. (2017). An integrated model of job involvement, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A structural analysis in Jordan’s banking sector. Communications and Network, 9, 28–53. https://doi.org/10.4236/cn.2017.91002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., & Giammarco, E. A. (2015). Relationships between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 58–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Almudever, B., Croity-Belz, S., & Hajjar, V. (2007). Constructing new relationships with the work organization in occupational transitions. Industrial Relations, 62, 613–640. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ambassade de France. (2018, February). La France en Allemagne. Retrieved from https://de.ambafrance.org/-Sprache First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Andrew, S. (1998). Self-efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00550.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1826 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. PajaresT. UrdanEds., Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beierlein, C., Kemper, C. J., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2013). Kurzskala zur Erfassung allgemeiner Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen (ASKU) [Short scale for measuring general self-efficacy beliefs (ASKU)]. Methoden, Data, Analysis, 7, 251–278. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2013.014 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Billiet, J. (2002). Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equation modeling. In P. P. MohlerEd., Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 247–264). New Jersey: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New Jersey: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bowling, N. A., & Huang, J. L. (2018). Your attention please! Toward a better understanding of research participant carelessness. Applied Psychology, 67, 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12143 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coelho, G. L. H., Monteiro, R. P., Hanel, P. H. P., Vilar, R., Gouveia, V. V., & Maio, G. R. (2018). Psychometric parameters of an abbreviated vengeance scale across two countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.042 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, G., Gully, S., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Decieux, J. P. P., Mergener, A., Sischka, P., & Neufang, K. (2015). Implementation of the forced answering option within online surveys: Do higher item response rates come at the expense of participation and answer quality? Psihologija, 48(4), 311–326. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eden, D. (2001). Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific subjective efficacy. In M. ErezU. KleinbeckH. ThierryEds., Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 73–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorial data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. HancockR. O. MuellerEds., Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/258514 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406288165 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gu, F., Little, T. D., & Kingston, N. M. (2013). Misestimation of reliability using coefficient alpha and structural equation modeling when assumptions of tau-equivalence and uncorrelated errors are violated. Methodology, 9, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000052 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Gummer, T., Roßmann, J., & Silber, H. (2018). Using instructed response items as attention checks in web surveys: Properties and implementation. Sociological Methods & Research. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769083 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haas, H. (2009). Übersetzungsprobleme in der interkulturellen Befragung [Translation problems in intercultural surveys]. Intercultural Journal, 81, 61–71. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harkness, J. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In J. HarknessF. Van de VijerP. MoherEds., Cultural survey methods (pp. 35–56). New Jersey: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD and London: The John Hopkins University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knapp, K. (1998). Das Englische als Fachsprache in internationalen Institutionen des 20. Jahrhunderts [English as foreign language within international organizations of the 20th century]. In H. StegerH. E. WiegandEds., Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (Vol. 14, 1, pp. 840–849). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & Røysamb, E. (2000). Perceived self-efficacy in health behavior research: Conceptualisation, measurement and correlates. Psychology and Health (15 pp. 51–69). https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400288 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Jorgensen, T. D., Lang, K. M., & Moore, E. W. G. (2013). On the joys of missing data. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst048 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1986). Selbstwirksamkeit [Self-efficacy]. In R. SchwarzerEd., Skalen zur Be-findlichkeit und Persönlichkeit [Scales of well-being and personality] (pp. 15–28). Berlin, Germany: Institut für Psychologie, Freie Universität Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Lin, S. H. J. (2016). Assessing the status of locus of control as an indicator of core self-evaluations. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. A. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kovaleva, A., Beierlein, C., Kemper, C. J., & Rammstedt, B. (2014). Internale-Externale-Kontrollüberzeugung-4 (IE-4) [Internal and external locus of control]. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis184 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0229482 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. MaehrP. R. PintrichEds., Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., & Beierlein, C. (2014). Can’t we make it any shorter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000141 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406661 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.18.3.242 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schumacher, A., Haas, C., Weis, D., & Heinen, A. (2015). Übergänge vom Bildungssystem in die Arbeitswelt [Transitions from education to work] In MENJE & ULEds., Ministry of Education, Children and Youth & University of Luxembourg, Nationaler Bericht zur Situation der Jugend in Luxemburg 2015 – Übergänge vom Jugend- ins Erwachsenenalter [National Report on the Situation of Youth in Luxembourg 2015 – Transitions from adolescence to adulthood]. Luxembourg: Bakform, 61–162. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. (1994). Optimistische Kompetenzerwartung: Zur Erfassung einer personalen Bewältigungsressource [Optimistic competence expectation: To capture a personal coping resource]. Diagnostica, 40, 105–123. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R.Jerusalem, M. (Eds.). (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen [Scales for measuring attributes of teachers and pupils]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shadur, K., & Rodwell, J. J. (1999). The relationship between organizational climate and employee perceptions of involvement. Group and Organization Management, 24, 479–503. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sherer, M., & Adams, C. H. (1983). Construct validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 899–902. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Song, Z., & Chathoth, P. K. (2010). An interactional approach to organizations’ success in socializing their intern newcomers: The role of General Self-Efficacy and Organizational Socialization Inventory. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 34, 364–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348009350648 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H. (2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000049 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality and Quantity, 43, 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/de/academic/subjects/psychology/psychology-research-methods-and-statistics/psychology-survey-response?format=PB&isbn=9780521576291 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van der Bijl, J. J., & Shortridge-Baggett, L. M. (2002). The theory and measurement of the self-efficacy construct. In E. A. LentzL. M. Shortridge-BaggettEds., Self-efficacy in nursing: Research and measurement perspectives (pp. 9–28). New York: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2018). Applying social psychology to prevent careless responding during online surveys. Applied Psychology, 67, 231–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In M. E. SobelM. P. BeckerEds., Sociological methodology 2000, 30 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: ASA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zavala-Rojas, D., & Saris, W. E. (2018). Measurement invariance in multilingual survey research: The role of the language of the questionnaire. Social Indicators Research, 140, 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1787-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zimmermann, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar