Qualitätssicherung im diagnostischen und interventionellen rheumatologischen Ultraschall
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die Qualitätssicherung zu Gunsten der Patienten ist im Alltag nicht mehr wegzudenken. Diese Arbeit beschreibt wichtige Aspekte bezüglich Sicherstellung von Standards zur Qualitätssicherung und Qualitätsverbesserung im diagnostischen und interventionellen rheumatologischen Ultraschall in der Schweiz durch die Arbeitsgruppe QIR («Quality in Rheumatology»). Qualitätsindikatoren in der Rheumatologie und Qualitätsstandards in der Arthrosonografie werden hervorgehoben und vorgestellt.
Abstract. Quality assessment for the benefit of patients is indispensable. This article describes important aspects which ensure standards for quality assessment and quality improvement in diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound in Switzerland defined by the working group QIR («Quality in Rheumatology»). Quality indicators in rheumatology and quality standards in musculoskeletal ultrasound are highlighted and presented.
Résumé. L’évaluation qualitative du bénéfice obtenu par les malades est indispensable. Ce travail décrit d’importants aspects concernant les standards établis pour l’évaluation de la qualité et pour améliorer l’ultrasonographie diagnostique et interventionnelle pour les affections musculosquelettiques, comme défini en Suisse par le groupe de travail QIR («Quality in Rheumatology»). Les indicateurs de qualité en rhumatologie et les standards de qualité en ultrasonographie musculosquelettique sont soulignés et présentés.
Bibliografie
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations : Primer on Indicator Development and Application. MeasuringQuality inHealth Care. Oakbrook Terrace , 1990.A strategy for quality assurance in Medicare. N Engl J Med 1990; 322 : 707–712.
:update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70 : 896–904.
, .: 2010European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71 : 4–12.
, .:EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumaticdrugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 : 492–509.
, .:Eckpfeiler der Qualitätssicherung in der Medizin in Deutschland. Z Rheumatol 2016; 75 : 203–212.
:Trends in treatment and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany 1997–2007: results from the national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69 : 1803–1808. (Erratum in: Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70 : 398).
:How closely does rheumatology treatment follow the guidelines? Ambition and reality. Z Rheumatol 2010; 69 : 318–326.
:Health-related quality of life in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics: data from the German biologics register RABBIT. Rheumatology 2015; 54 : 1858–1866.
, .:Persistence of ultrasound synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis fulfilling the DAS28 and/or the new ACR/EULAR RA remission definitions: results of an observational cohort study. Joint Bone Spine 2014; 81 : 426–432.
, .:Recommendations for the use of ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: literature review and SONAR score experience. Swiss Med Wkly 2013; 143 : w13861.
, .:American College of Rheumatology quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis: benchmarking, variability, and opportunities to improve quality of care using the electronic health record. ArthritisRheum 2008; 59 : 1705–1712.
:Healthcare quality indicators on the management of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a literature review. Rheumatology 2013; 52 : 382–390.
, .:Development of quality indicators for monitoring of the disease course in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 : 1805–1810.
:Quality indicators in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the METEOR database. Rheumatology 2015; 54 : 1630–1639.
, .:Quality indicators in rheumatology: valid for whom? Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 : 1797–1799.
:Quality indicators in rheumatoid arthritis care: usingmeasurement to promote quality improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72 (Suppl 2): ii128-ii131.
:Development of healthcare quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: the eumusc.netproject. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 : 906–908.
, .:Development of patientcentred standards of care for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: theeumusc.netproject. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 : 902–905.
, .:American College of Rheumatology : (2012) Rheumatoid arthritis quality indicators. http://www.rheumatology.org/Practice-Quality. Letzter Zugriff: 31.10.2016.Quality indicators for the care of osteoarthritis in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55 (Suppl 2): S383-S391.
:Measuring quality in arthritis care: methods for developing the Arthritis Foundation’s quality indicator set. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51 : 193–202.
:Quality indicators indicate good adherence to the clinical practice guideline on «Osteoarthritis of the hip and knee» and few prognostic factors influence outcomeindicators: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010; 6 : 337–345.
:Healthcareresearchinrheumatology. Currentstate. Z Rheumatol 2014; 73 : 115–122.
:Health care quality indicators on the management of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a literature review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52 : 382–390.
, .:EULAR recommendations for patient education of people with inflammatory arthritis: Translation and evaluation in Germany. Z Rheumatol 2016; 75 : 187.
, .:Novel algorithms for the pragmatic use of ultrasound in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: from diagnosis to remission. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75 : 1902–1908.
, .:Ultrasound in management of rheumatoid arthritis: ARCTIC randomised controlled strategy trial. BMJ 2016; 354 : i4205.
, .: