Skip to main content
Editorial

Aging Dyads and Health

New Perspectives on Interpersonal Processes in Aging

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000242
Free first page

References

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Norman, C. (2004). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In M. B. BrewerM. HewstoneEds., Perspectives on social psychology. Self and social identity (pp. 99–123). Malden: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Badr, H. (2004). Coping in marital dyads: A contextual perspective on the role of gender and health. Personal Relationships, 11, 197–211. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (2010). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. BaltesM. M. BaltesEds., European Network on Longitudinal Studies on Individual Development. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult lifespan. Psychological Bulletin November, 133, 920–954. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berli, C., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., Stadler, G., & Scholz, U. (2018). Interpersonal processes of couples’ daily support for goal pursuit: The example of physical activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739264 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000455 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Birditt, K. S., & Fingerman, K. L. (2005). Do we get better at picking our battles? Age group differences in descriptions of behavioral reactions to interpersonal tensions. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(3), P121–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.3.p121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Birditt, K. S., Fingerman, K. L., & Almeida, D. M. (2005). Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary study. Psychology and Aging, 20, 330–340. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034272 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée, 47, 137–141. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolger, N., Delongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 51, 175–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1995). Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brose, A., Scheibe, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2013). Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030047 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, E. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411164 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, E. A., & Barnard, K. J. (2019). Quantifying interpersonal dynamics for studying socio-emotional processes and adverse health behaviors. Psychosomatic Medicine, 81, 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000703 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, E. A., & Randall, A. K. (2012). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451630 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Debrot, A., Schoebi, D., Perrez, M., & Horn, A. B. (2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497592 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ditzen, B., Schaer, M., Gabriel, B., Bodenmann, G., Ulrike, E., & Markus, H. (2009). Intranasal oxytocin increases positive communication and reduces cortisol levels during couple conflict. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 728–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erber, R., & Erber, M. W. (2001). Mood and processing: A view from self-regulation perspective. In L. L. MartinEd., Theories of mood and cognition (pp. 63–84). Milton: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fergus, K. (2015). Theoretical and methodological underpinnings of resilience in couples: Locating the “we”. In K. SkerrettK. FergusEds., Couple resilience: Emerging perspectives (pp. 23–42). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haase, C. M., Holley, S. R., Bloch, L., Verstaen, A., & Levenson, R. W. (2016). Interpersonal emotional behaviors and physical health: A 20-year longitudinal study of long-term married couples. Emotion, 16, 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haase, C. M., & Shiota, M. N. (2019). Intimate relationships in late life: The roles of motivation and emotion. In D. SchoebiB. CamposEds., New directions in the psychology of close relationships (pp. 45–61). London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351136266 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hagedoorn, M., Sanderman, R., Bolks, H. N., Tuinstra, J., & Coyne, J. C. (2008). Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 1–30. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of lifespan development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holley, S. R., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2013). Age-related changes in demand-withdraw communication behaviors. Journal of Marriage & Family, 75, 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12051 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoppmann, C. A., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Spousal interrelations in old age: A mini-review. Gerontology, 55, 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1159/000211948 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoppmann, C. A., Gerstorf, D., & Hibbert, A. (2011). Spousal associations between functional limitation and depressive symptom trajectories: Longitudinal findings from the Study of Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). Health Psychology, 30, 153–162. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoppmann, C. A., Michalowski, V. I., & Gerstorf, D. (2016). Spousal interrelationships in health across adulthood: Health behaviors and everyday stress as potential underlying mechanisms. In J. BookwalaEd., Couple relationships in the middle and later years: Their nature, complexity, and role in health and illness (pp. 239–257). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoppmann, C. A., & Riediger, M. (2009). Ambulatory assessment in lifespan psychology: An overview of current status and new trends. European Psychologist, 14, 98–108. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, A. B., & Maercker, A. (2016). Intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation and adjustment symptoms in couples: The role of co-brooding and co-reappraisal. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0159-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, A. B., Samson, A. C., Debrot, A., & Perrez, M. (2018). Positive humor in couples as interpersonal emotion regulation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 2376–2396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518788197 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Houben, M., van den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 901–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hülür, G., Hoppmann, C. A., Rauers, A., Schade, H., Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2016). Empathic accuracy for happiness in the daily lives of older couples: Fluid cognitive performance predicts pattern accuracy among men. Psychology and Aging, 31, 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000109 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(21149854), 39–44. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joiner, T. E., & Katz, J. (1999). Contagion of depressive symptoms and mood: Meta-analytic review and explanations from cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal viewpoints. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 149–164. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koss, C. S., & Jensen, D. (2019). Going it alone: Advance directive discordance in older married couples. Journal of Applied Gerontology, https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464819884439 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(9599440), 1238–1251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). The common fate model for dyadic data: Variations of a theoretically important but underutilized model. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026624 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotions: A functional view. In P. EkmanR. DavidsonEds., Series in affective science. The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 123–126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maercker, A., & Horn, A. B. (2013). A socio-interpersonal perspective on PTSD: The case for environments and interpersonal processes. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1805 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maisel, N. C., & Gable, S. L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20, 928–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manne, S., Ostroff, J., Rini, C., Fox, K., Goldstein, L., & Grana, G. (2004). The interpersonal process model of intimacy: The role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.589 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, F., Hagedoorn, M., Soriano, E. C., Stephenson, E., Smink, A., Hoff, C., … Tuinman, M. A. (2019). Couples’ catastrophizing and co-rumination: Dyadic diary study of patient fatigue after cancer. Health Psychology, 38, 1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000803 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023419 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reed, R. G., Barnard, K., & Butler, E. A. (2015). Distinguishing emotional coregulation from codysregulation: An investigation of emotional dynamics and body weight in romantic couples. Emotion, 15, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038561 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rime, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In J. J. GrossEd., Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robbins, M. L., Karan, A., López, A. M., & Weihs, K. L. (2018). Naturalistically observing noncancer conversations among couples coping with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 27, 2206–2213. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4797 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Röcke, C., & Brose, A. (2013). Intraindividual variability and stability of affect and well-being. GeroPsych, 26, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000094 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Röcke, C., Brose, A., & Kuppens, P. (2018). Emotion dynamics in older age. In P. M. ColeT. HollensteinEds., Frontiers of developmental science. Emotion regulation: A matter of time (pp. 179–207). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Röcke, C., Li, S.-C., & Smith, J. (2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016276 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rohr, M. K., & Lang, F. R. (2009). Aging well together: A mini-review. Gerontology, 55, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1159/000212161 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rook, K. S. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1108. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rook, K. S. (1990). Stressful aspects of older adults’ social relationships: Current theory and research. In Stress and coping in later-life families (pp. 173–192). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rook, K. S., & Charles, S. T. (2017). Close social ties and health in later life: Strengths and vulnerabilities. American Psychologist, 72, 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000104 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: An integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308315702 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholz, U. (2019). It’s time to think about time in health psychology. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 11, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12156 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sels, L., Cabrieto, J., Butler, E., Reis, H., Ceulemans, E., & Kuppens, P. (2019). The occurrence and correlates of emotional interdependence in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000212 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skoyen, J. A., Kogan, A. V., Novak, S. A., & Butler, E. A. (2013). Health behavior and emotion regulation in couples. In N. A. RobertsM. L. NewmanEds., Health and social relationships: The good, the bad, and the complicated (pp. 121–142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Slatcher, R. B., & Selcuk, E. (2017). A social psychological perspective on the links between close relationships and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416667444 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stadler, G., Snyder, K. A., Horn, A. B., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2012). Close relationships and health in daily life: A review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825473b8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thorson, K. R., West, T. V., & Mendes, W. B. (2018). Measuring physiological influence in dyads: A guide to designing, implementing, and analyzing dyadic physiological studies. Psychological Methods, 23, 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000166 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vilchinsky, N., Dekel, R., Revenson, T. A., Liberman, G., & Mosseri, M. (2015). Caregivers’ burden and depressive symptoms: The moderational role of attachment orientations. Health Psychology, 34, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vitaliano, P. P., Zhang, J., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003). Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 946–972. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waters, S. F., West, T. V., & Mendes, W. B. (2014). Stress contagion: Physiological covariation between mothers and infants. Psychological Science, 25, 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518352 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zee, K. S., & Bolger, N. (2019). Visible and invisible social support: How, why, and when. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835214 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar