References
2004).
(Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond . In M. B. BrewerM. HewstoneEds., Perspectives on social psychology. Self and social identity (pp. 99–123). Malden: Blackwell.2004). Coping in marital dyads: A contextual perspective on the role of gender and health. Personal Relationships, 11, 197–211.
(2010).
(Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation . In P. B. BaltesM. M. BaltesEds., European Network on Longitudinal Studies on Individual Development. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684.0032007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult lifespan. Psychological Bulletin November, 133, 920–954.
(2018). Interpersonal processes of couples’ daily support for goal pursuit: The example of physical activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739264
(1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000455
(2005). Do we get better at picking our battles? Age group differences in descriptions of behavioral reactions to interpersonal tensions. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(3), P121–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.3.p121
(2005). Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary study. Psychology and Aging, 20, 330–340.
(2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034272
(1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée, 47, 137–141.
(2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
(1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 51, 175–183.
(2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford.
(1995). Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213008
(1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.
(2013). Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030047
(2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411164
(2019). Quantifying interpersonal dynamics for studying socio-emotional processes and adverse health behaviors. Psychosomatic Medicine, 81, 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000703
(2012). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451630
(2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.
(2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497592
(2009). Intranasal oxytocin increases positive communication and reduces cortisol levels during couple conflict. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 728–731.
(2001).
(Mood and processing: A view from self-regulation perspective . In L. L. MartinEd., Theories of mood and cognition (pp. 63–84). Milton: Taylor & Francis.2015).
(Theoretical and methodological underpinnings of resilience in couples: Locating the “we” . In K. SkerrettK. FergusEds., Couple resilience: Emerging perspectives (pp. 23–42). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_22016). Interpersonal emotional behaviors and physical health: A 20-year longitudinal study of long-term married couples. Emotion, 16, 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040239
(2019).
(Intimate relationships in late life: The roles of motivation and emotion . In D. SchoebiB. CamposEds., New directions in the psychology of close relationships (pp. 45–61). London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/97813511362662008). Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 1–30.
(2010). A motivational theory of lifespan development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668
(2013). Age-related changes in demand-withdraw communication behaviors. Journal of Marriage & Family, 75, 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12051
(2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352
(2009). Spousal interrelations in old age: A mini-review. Gerontology, 55, 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1159/000211948
(2011). Spousal associations between functional limitation and depressive symptom trajectories: Longitudinal findings from the Study of Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). Health Psychology, 30, 153–162.
(2016).
(Spousal interrelationships in health across adulthood: Health behaviors and everyday stress as potential underlying mechanisms . In J. BookwalaEd., Couple relationships in the middle and later years: Their nature, complexity, and role in health and illness (pp. 239–257). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2009). Ambulatory assessment in lifespan psychology: An overview of current status and new trends. European Psychologist, 14, 98–108.
(2016). Intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation and adjustment symptoms in couples: The role of co-brooding and co-reappraisal. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0159-7
(2018). Positive humor in couples as interpersonal emotion regulation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 2376–2396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518788197
(2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 901–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822
(2016). Empathic accuracy for happiness in the daily lives of older couples: Fluid cognitive performance predicts pattern accuracy among men. Psychology and Aging, 31, 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000109
(2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x
(2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(21149854), 39–44.
(1999). Contagion of depressive symptoms and mood: Meta-analytic review and explanations from cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal viewpoints. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 149–164.
(2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
(2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.
(2019). Going it alone: Advance directive discordance in older married couples. Journal of Applied Gerontology, https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464819884439
(1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(9599440), 1238–1251.
(2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97.
(2012). The common fate model for dyadic data: Variations of a theoretically important but underutilized model. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026624
(1994).
(Human emotions: A functional view . In P. EkmanR. DavidsonEds., Series in affective science. The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 123–126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2013). A socio-interpersonal perspective on PTSD: The case for environments and interpersonal processes. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1805
(2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20, 928–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x
(2004). The interpersonal process model of intimacy: The role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.589
(2019). Couples’ catastrophizing and co-rumination: Dyadic diary study of patient fatigue after cancer. Health Psychology, 38, 1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000803
(2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023419
(2015). Distinguishing emotional coregulation from codysregulation: An investigation of emotional dynamics and body weight in romantic couples. Emotion, 15, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038561
(2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.
(2007).
(Interpersonal emotion regulation . In J. J. GrossEd., Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York, NY: Guilford.2018). Naturalistically observing noncancer conversations among couples coping with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 27, 2206–2213. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4797
(2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859
(2013). Intraindividual variability and stability of affect and well-being. GeroPsych, 26, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000094
(2018).
(Emotion dynamics in older age . In P. M. ColeT. HollensteinEds., Frontiers of developmental science. Emotion regulation: A matter of time (pp. 179–207). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016276
(2009). Aging well together: A mini-review. Gerontology, 55, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1159/000212161
(1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1108.
(1990). Stressful aspects of older adults’ social relationships: Current theory and research. In Stress and coping in later-life families (pp. 173–192). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
(2017). Close social ties and health in later life: Strengths and vulnerabilities. American Psychologist, 72, 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000104
(2008). Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: An integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308315702
(2019). It’s time to think about time in health psychology. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 11, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12156
(2019). The occurrence and correlates of emotional interdependence in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000212
(2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320
(2013).
(Health behavior and emotion regulation in couples . In N. A. RobertsM. L. NewmanEds., Health and social relationships: The good, the bad, and the complicated (pp. 121–142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2017). A social psychological perspective on the links between close relationships and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416667444
(2012). Close relationships and health in daily life: A review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825473b8
(2018). Measuring physiological influence in dyads: A guide to designing, implementing, and analyzing dyadic physiological studies. Psychological Methods, 23, 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000166
(2015). Caregivers’ burden and depressive symptoms: The moderational role of attachment orientations. Health Psychology, 34, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000121
(2003). Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 946–972. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946
(2014). Stress contagion: Physiological covariation between mothers and infants. Psychological Science, 25, 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518352
(2019). Visible and invisible social support: How, why, and when. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835214
(