Grundriss einer sozialpsychologischen Respekttheorie
Implikationen für Kooperation und Konflikt in pluralistischen Gesellschaften
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. In diesem Beitrag entwickele ich den Grundriss einer sozialpsychologischen Respekttheorie. Mein Augenmerk richtet sich insbesondere auf die Bedeutung von Respekt für das Zusammenleben in der pluralistischen Gesellschaft. Im Rahmen eines Brückenschlags zu anerkennungstheoretischen Überlegungen sozialphilosophischer Provenienz erarbeite ich zunächst eine Konzeption von Respekt als Gleichheitsanerkennung. Anschließend diskutiere ich empirische Befunde aus eigenen Forschungsarbeiten, die zum einen die grundlegende Respektkonzeption validieren und zum anderen wichtige soziale Auswirkungen von Respekt (sowie von mangelndem Respekt) beleuchten. Der Beitrag schließt mit Überlegungen zur Dynamik von Respekt und einem Ausblick auf politisierte Anerkennungskämpfe in pluralistischen Gesellschaften.
Abstract. In this article, I outline a social psychological theory of respect with a particular emphasis on the importance of respect for social life in pluralistic societies. Building on social recognition approaches in social philosophy, I first elaborate on a conception of respect as equality recognition. Subsequently, I discuss empirical findings from our own program of research, which validate the proposed respect concept and illuminate important social consequences of respect (as well as of disrespect). I close with some considerations regarding the dynamics of respect and possible trajectories of politicized struggles for recognition in pluralistic societies.
Literatur
(1998). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(2014). Society matters: The mediational role of social recognition in the relationship between victimization and life satisfaction among gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 195 – 201. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2007
(2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445 – 464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
(2014). Das Wir im Ich – Soziale Grundlagen der Selbstbestimmung. Dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel. Verfügbar unter http://macau.uni-kiel.de/receive/dissertation_diss_00014809
(1977). Two kinds of respect. Ethics, 88, 36 – 49.
(1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137 – 150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x
(2013). European Union lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
(1975). Some conjectures on the concept of respect. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 1 – 3.
(2003). Toleranz im Konflikt. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
(1992). Democratic values and the transformation of the Soviet Union. The Journal of Politics, 54, 329 – 371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132030
(1998). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(1999). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(1994). Kampf um Anerkennung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(2000). Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit: Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(2011). Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(2003). The true clash of civilizations. Foreign Policy, 135, 63 – 70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3183594
(2008).
The social psychology of respect: Implications for delegitimization and reconciliation . In A. NadlerT. MalloyJ. D. FisherEds., The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 145 – 170). New York: Oxford University Press.(1974). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
(1990). Die Metaphysik der Sitten – zweiter Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre. Stuttgart: Reclam.
(2008). A new politics of identity: Political principles for an interdependent world. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
(1971). The categorical imperative: A study in Kant’s moral philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
(2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
(2011). Social recognition as an equal: The role of equality-based respect in group life. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 501 – 507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.814
(2000). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
(2003). The difficulty of tolerance: Essays in political philosophy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Respect, equality, and power: A social psychological perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung – Zeitschrift für angewandte Sozialpsychologie, 38, 309 – 326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-007-0027-2
(2010). Respekt und Zumutung bei der Begegnung von Schwulen/Lesben und Muslimen. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 15 – 16, 27 – 32.
(2012). Kultureller Pluralismus: Zwischen Respektzumutung und Politisierung. Nova Acta Leopoldina, 116, 161 – 181.
(2014). To be respected and to respect: The challenge of mutual respect in intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 39 – 53. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12019
(2015). On the meaning of respect for sexual minorities: The case of gays and lesbians. Psychology & Sexuality, 6, 297 – 310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.987683
(2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319 – 331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
(2006). The added value of respect: Reaching across inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 535 – 546. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X57637
(2015). Reaching across group boundaries: Respect from outgroup members facilitates recategorization as a common group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 616 – 628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12112
(2013). When dual identity becomes a liability: Identity and political radicalism among migrants. Psychological Science, 24, 251 – 257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956767612450889
(2016). Tolerance as a function of disapproval and respect: The case of Muslims. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 375 – 383. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12137
(2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183 – 193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239043
(2005). In search of the active ingredients of respect: A closer look at the role of acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 809 – 818. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.272
(1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470 – 493.
(1979). An alternative conceptualization of political tolerance: Illusory increases 1950s–1970s. American Political Science Review, 73, 781 – 794. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955404
(1992). Multiculturalism and “the politics of recognition.” Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
(2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349 – 361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
(2010).
Multiculturalism and tolerance: An intergroup perspective . In R. CrispEd., The psychology of social and cultural diversity (pp. 147 – 170). Oxford: Blackwell.(1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
