Conciliating the Dimensionality Debate Surrounding SDT and Redefining Motivation? A Comment on Meyer et al.’s (2022) Article “Motivational Mindsets Versus Reasons for Action”
Literatur
2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 575 – 585. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036212
(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227 – 268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
(2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1346 – 1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125
(2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44, 2638 – 2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653
(2019). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Time for expansion and clarification. Motivation Science, 5, 277 – 290. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000116
(2022). Motivational mindsets versus reasons for action: Implications for the dimensionality debate in self-determination theory. Motivation and Emotion, 46, 486 – 507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09958-x
(2018).
(Intrinsic Motivation and Flow . In J. HeckhausenH. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (3rd ed., pp. 579 – 622). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_142021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7, 97 – 110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
(2021). Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organizational Psychology Review, 11, 240 – 273. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173
(