Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

The Role of Structure in the Assessment of Psychopathology

Published Online:September 01, 2006https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.20.4.275

Abstract

Summary: This study investigated the role that the structure of a diagnostic instrument plays in the assessment of personality functioning. Empirical studies have shown that the cards of the Rorschach and Holtzman Inkblot Technique (HIT) vary significantly with regard to their structure. Thus, it was possible to investigate if cards of high vs. low structure tend to elicit specific diagnostically useful responses. For this purpose, samples of normals (n = 30), patients with neurotic disorders (n = 30), borderline patients (n = 30), acute schizophrenics (n = 25), and chronic schizophrenics (n = 25) were studied with the HIT. For each diagnostic group it was examined if cards of high vs. low structure tended to elicit more thought disordered responses, hostility, and anxiety according to the HIT scoring system. With regard to structure, two aspects were differentiated, structural vs. interpretative ambiguity of the HIT cards. In all nonschizophrenic groups, cards of high structural ambiguity elicited significantly less thought disordered responses. By contrast, cards of high interpretative ambiguity elicited more thought disordered responses, anxiety, and hostility in all groups except the chronic schizophrenics. The measures of structural vs. interpretative ambiguity of the HIT cards showed a negative correlation in all diagnostic groups. According to these results, both aspects of ambiguity and their interplay play an important role in the assessment of psychopathology, at least within the range of ambiguity represented by the inkblots of the HIT.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1983). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arnheim, R. (1951). Perceptual and aesthetic aspects of the movement response. Journal of Personality, 19, 265– 281 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beckmann, D. Braehler, E. Richter, H.-E. (1983). Der Giessen-Test . [The Giessen-Test]. Bern: Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carr, A.C. Goldstein, E.G. Hunt, H.F. Kernberg, O.F. (1979). Psychological tests and borderline patients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 582– 590 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Center for Computing in the Humanities (1988). MTAS, a micro text-analysis system . University of Toronto First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Degwitz, R. Hrsg. (1980). Diagnoseschlüssel und Glossar psychiatrischer Krankheiten: dt. Ausgaben der internat. Klassifikation d. Krankheiten der World Health Organization (WHO) (9. Aufl.). [International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th ed.]. Berlin: Springer First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Derogatis, L.R. Gorham, D.R. Mosely, E.C. (1968). Structural vs. interpretative ambiguity: A cross-cultural study with the Holtzman Inkblots. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 32, 66– 73 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eckert, J. Biermann-Ratjen, E.-M. Papenhausen, R. Talmon- Gros, S. Tönnies, S. Seifert, R. Spehr, W. (1987). Zur Diagnose von Borderline-Störungen: Überprüfung der Gütekriterien des Diagnostischen Interview für Borderline-Störungen (DIB). [The diagnosis of a borderline disorder: Testing psychometric qualities of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines] Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 37, 68– 75 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Edell, W.S. (1987). The role of structure in disordered thinking in borderline and schizophrenic disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 23– 41 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 108– 143 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gamble, K.R. (1972). The Holtzman Inkblot Technique. A review. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 172– 194 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gunderson, J.G. Singer, M.T. (1975). Defining borderline patients: An overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1– 10 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harris, D. (1993). The prevalence of thought disorder in personality-disordered outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 112– 120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herron, E.W. (1963). Psychometric characteristics of a 30-item version of the group method of the Holtzman Inkblot Technique. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 450– 453 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holtzman, W.H. (1988). Beyond the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 578– 609 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holtzman, W.H. Thorpe, J.S. Swartz, J.D. Herron, E.W. (1961). Inkblot perception and personality . Austin: University of Texas First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jäger, R. Lischer, S. Münster, B. Ritz, B. (1976). Biographisches Inventar zur Diagnose von Verhaltensstörungen (BIV), Handanweisung . [Biographic Inventory for the Diagnosis of Behavioral Disorders]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnston, M.H. Holzman, P.S. (1979). Assessing schizophrenic thinking . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kernberg, O.F. (1984). Severe personality disorders. Psychotherapeutic strategies . New Haven, CT: Yale University First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kleining, G. Moore, H. (1968). Soziale Selbsteinstufung (SSE). Ein Instrument zur Messung sozialer Schichten. [Social self-rating: An instrument for the assessment of social status] Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 20, 502– 552 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kolb, J.E. Gunderson, J.G. (1980). Diagnosing borderline patients with a semistructured interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 37– 41 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leichsenring, F. (2004). The influence of color on emotions in the Holtzman Inkblot Technique. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 116– 123 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Leichsenring, F. Hager, W. (1992). Reizambiguität beim Rorschach-Test und bei der Holtzman Inkblot Technik. [Structural ambiguity in the Rorschach and the Holtzman Inkblot Technique] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 13, 91– 96 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leichsenring, F. Meyer, H.A. (1992). Kognitiver Stil bei Schizophrenen: Ambiguitäts-Reduktion und verminderte Abstraktheit. [Cognitive style in schizophrenics: Reduction of ambiguity and reduced abstractness] Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie, 40, 136– 147 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leichsenring, F. Meyer, H.A. (1994). Reduzierung von Ambiguität: sprachstatistische Untersuchungen an “Normalen,” Neurotikern, Borderline-Patienten und Schizophrenen. [Reduction of ambiguity: Studies in normals, neurotics, borderline patients, and schizophrenics] Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie, 42, 355– 372 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leichsenring, F. Roth, T. Meyer, H.A. (1992). Kognitiver Stil bei Borderline-Patienten: Ambiguitäts-Vermeidung und verminderte Abstraktheit. [Cognitive style in borderline patients: Avoidance of ambiguity and reduced abstractness] Diagnostica, 38, 52– 65 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, W. (1975). Familie - Schule - Beruf. Analysen zur sozialen Mobilität und Statuszuweisung in der BRD . [Family - School - Profession: Analyses of social mobility and status]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, H.A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual . Cambridge: Harvard University First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Murstein, B.I. (1960). The measurement of ambiguity for thematic cards. Journal of Projective Techniques, 24, 419– 423 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murstein, B.I. Mathes, S. (1996). Projection on projective techniques = pathology: The problem that is not being addressed. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 337– 349 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murstein, B.I. Wolf, S.R. (1970). Empirical test of the level hypothesis with five projective techniques. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 75, 38– 44 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robins, L.N. Helzer, J.E. Croughan, I. Ratcliff, K.S. (1981). The NIMH diagnostic interview schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381– 389 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1945). The picture association method and its application in a study of reactions to frustration. Journal of Personality, 14, 3– 23 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stone, M.H. (1990). The fate of borderline patients. Successful outcome and psychiatric practice . New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wittchen, H.-U. Rupp, H.U. (1981). Das Diagnostik Interview Schedule (Version II), Deutsche Version. [Diagnostic Interview Schedule, German version II]. München: Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie First citation in articleGoogle Scholar