Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.1
Free first page

References

  • Bartram, D. (2001). Guidelines for test users. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 173– 186 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, W.L. (2005). The SRM approach to family assessment: An introduction and case example. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 216– 225 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • De Bruyn, E.E.J. (2005). Family assessment and methodological issues: Introduction to the Special Section. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 213– 215 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Delsing, M.J.M.H. Oud, J.H.L. De Bruyn, E.E.J. (2005). Assessment of bidirectional influences between family relationships and adolescent problem behavior: Discrete versus continuous time analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 226– 231 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • De Raad, B. (1999). Interpersonal lexicon: Structural evidence from two independently constructed verb-based taxonomies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 181– 195 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Eignor, D.R. (2001). Standards for the development and use of tests: Standards for educational and psychological testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 157– 163 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fernández-Ballesteros, R. De Bruyn, E.E.E. Godoy, A. Hornke, L. Ter Laak, J. Vizcarro, C. Westhoff, W. Westmeyer, H. Zaccagnini, J.L. (2001). Guidelines for the assessment process: A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 187– 200 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Godoy, A. Gavino, A. (2003). Information-gathering strategies in behavioral assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 204– 209 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gurtman, M.B. (1999). An interpersonal analysis and reformulation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 233– 245 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hambleton, R.K. (2001). Guidelines for test translation and adaptation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164– 172 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Haynes, S.N. Williams, A.W. (2003). Clinical case formulation and the design of behavioral treatment programs: Matching treatment mechanisms to causal variables for behavior problems. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 164– 174 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, K.A. (2002). Introduction to the Special Section. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 187– 189 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, K.A. Reimann, R. (2002). Theoretical and methodological problems of a 10-year follow-up program evaluation study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 229– 241 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • De Janssens, J.M.A.M. Bruyn, E.E.J. Manders, W.A. Scholte, R.H.J. (2005). The multitrait-multimethod approach in family assessment: Mutual parent-child relationships assessed by questionnaires and observations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 232– 239 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kreppner (2005). Family assessment and methodological issues: Discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1, 249– 254 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kroes, G. Veerman, J.W. De Bruyn, E.E.J. (2003). Bias in parental reports? Maternal psychopathology and the reporting of problem behavior in clinic-referred children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 195– 203 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Martínez-Arias, R. Silva, F. Díaz-Hidalgo, M.T. Ortet, G. Moro, M. (1999). The structure of Wiggins' Interpersonal Circumplex: Cross-cultural studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 196– 205 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Muñiz, J. Bartram, D. Evers, A. Boben, D. Matesic, K. Glabeke, K. Fernández-Hermida, R.R. Zaal, J.N. (2001). Testing practice in European countries.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 201– 211 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Neber, H. Heller, K.A. (2002). Evaluation of a summer-school program for highly gifted secondary-school children: The German Pupils Academy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 214– 228 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Nicole, S. Caprara, G.V. (2005). Assessing aggressive behavior in children: A neuro-fuzzy model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 255– 264 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Pincus, A.L. Dickinson, K.A. Schut, A.J. Castonguay, L.G. Bedics, J. (1999). Integrating interpersonal assessment and adult attachment using SASB. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 206– 220 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schiepek, G. (2003b). A dynamic systems approach to clinical case formulations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 175– 184 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, J.A. Wagner, C.C. Kiesler, D.J. (1999). Covert reactions to Big Five personality traits: The impact message inventory and the NEO-PI-R. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 221– 232 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schober, B. Ziegler, A. (2002). Theoretical levels in the evaluation of motivational trainings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 204– 213 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Trobst, K.K. (1999). Social support as an interpersonal construct. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 246– 255 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Van Geert, P.L.C. Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2005). A dynamic systems approach to family assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 240– 248 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, R.F. (2003). Clinical case formulation within the metatheoretical framework of the research program on subjective theories for patients with chronic diseases. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 185– 194 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Watermann, R. Klieme, E. (2002). Reporting results of large-scale assessment in psychologically meaningful terms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 190– 203 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Westmeyer, H. (2003a). Clinical case formulation: Introduction to the Special Issue. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 161– 163 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Westmeyer, H. (2003b). On the structure of case formulations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 210– 216 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar