The Assessment of Charismatic Leadership
Validity of a German Version of the Conger-Kanungo Scale (CKS)
Abstract
This paper examines the psychometric properties of a German version of the Conger-Kanungo Scale (CKS) of charismatic leadership, and compares charismatic leadership with the two leadership paradigms that have dominated theory and practice to date: the transformational/transactional paradigm and the consideration/initiating structure paradigm. An empirical study (N = 404) was conducted to explore aspects of reliability and validity of the CKS. In terms of construct validity, it was demonstrated that the translated instrument had adequate factorial validity. In addition, charismatic leadership measured in terms of the CKS showed convergent validity with respect to both transformational and transactional leadership and initiating structure, and divergent validity with respect to laissez-faire and consideration. In sum, the results contribute to leadership theory (e.g., comparing and contrasting several leadership theories) and practice.
References
(2002). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In , Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: JAI.
(2002). Developing potential across a full range of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
(1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52, 130–139.
(2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
(1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637–647.
(1988). Charismatic leadership. The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(1992). Perceived behavioral attributes of charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 24, 86–102.
(1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations – Perceived behavioral-attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 439–452.
(1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 747–767.
(1997). Measuring charisma: Dimensionality and validity of the Conger-Kanungo scale of charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 290–302.
(1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219–256.
(1971). Fragebogen zur Vorgesetzten-Verhaltens-Beschreibung (FVVB) [
Supervisory Behavior Description Questionnaire ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12, 1–6.
(1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In , Current developments in the study of leadership (pp. 1–40). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
(1996). A quantitative review of research on charismatic leadership. Psychological Reports, 78, 271–287.
(2001). A theoretical and empirical extension to the transformational leadership construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 759–774.
(1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership – Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multidomain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.
(2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172.
(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
(1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.
(1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259–298.
(2004). MLQ-5X. German translation of Bass and Avolio’s Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
(2005). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the German translation by Jens Rowold. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
(
in press ) Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. Leadership Quarterly.(1969). Validity of leader behavior descriptions. Personnel Psychology, 22, 153–158.
(1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305.
(2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
