Skip to main content

General and Specific Avoidance

The Development and Concurrent Validation of a New Measure of Avoidance Coping

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000220

Abstract. Research on coping has been hampered by psychometric shortcomings in coping scales, which have typically relied on items based on face-value, extracted too many factors or lacked the evidence for the obtained structure from confirmatory factor analysis. The present paper describes the development and concurrent validation of a new three-factor avoidance coping scale, the General and Specific Avoidance Questionnaire (GSAQ), which comprises General Avoidance, Emotional Avoidance, and Conflict Avoidance. In contrast to earlier scales the items were derived from a scenario technique which elicits items from participants’ experience, and the three-factor structure was endorsed by two confirmatory factor analyses on independent samples and a further exploratory factor analysis based on the total pooled sample of participants from all three analyses. Factor correlations indicate that the scales measure discrete facets of the avoidance coping domain, and while concurrent validation showed that General and Conflict Avoidance were related in predictable ways to criterion measures, the pattern for Emotional Avoidance was unexpected.

References

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parcelling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modelling. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 78–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borrill, J., Fox, P. & Roger, D. (2011). Religion, ethnicity, coping style, and self-reported self-harm in a diverse non-clinical UK population. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14, 259–269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A., Choprita, B. F., Korotitch, W. & Barlow, D. H. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 79–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models, (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clarke, J. & Roger, D. (2007). The construction and validation of a scale to assess psychological risk and well-being in sex offender treatment providers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 83–100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, J. & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2011). The mediation effect of experiential avoidance between coping and psychopathology in chronic pain. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 34–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crawford, J. R. & Henry, J. D. (2003). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 111–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davies, M. I. & Clark, D. M. (1998). Thought suppression produces a rebound effect with analogue post-traumatic intrusions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 571–582. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Endler, N. S. & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forbes, A. & Roger, D. (1999). Stress, social support and fear of disclosure. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 165–179. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, L. C., Nelson, D. V., Baer, P. E., Lane, M., Smith, F. E. & Dworkin, R. J. (1992). The relationship of dispositional optimism, daily life stress, and domestic environment to coping methods used by cancer patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 127–141. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C. & Watson, D. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23, 692–713. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenglass, E., Schwarzer, R., Jakubiec, S. D., Fiksenbaum, L. & Taubert, S. (1999, July 12–14). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument, Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of the STAR (Stress and Anxiety Research Society), Cracow, Poland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M. & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 151–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lovibond, S. H. & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lyne, K. & Roger, D. (2000). A psychometric re-assessment of the COPE questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 321–335. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1401–1415. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nielsen, J. & Shapiro, S. (2009). Coping with fear through suppression and avoidance of threatening information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 258–274. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 396–402. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ottenbreit, N. D. & Dobson, K. S. (2004). Avoidance and depression: The construction of the cognitive-behavioral avoidance scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 293–313. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oxlad, M., Miller-Lewis, L. & Wade, T. D. (2004). The measurement of coping responses: Validity of the Billings and Moos Coping Checklist. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 477–484. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed.). (2004). Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roger, D. (1996, July). The role of cognitive rumination, coping styles and self-esteem in moderating the adaptational responses to stress, Paper presented at the 8th European Conference on Personality, University of Ghent. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roger, D., Guarino de Scremin, L., Borrill, J. & Forbes, A. (2011). Rumination, inhibition and stress: The construction of a new scale for assessing emotional style. Current Psychology, 30, 234–244. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roger, D., Jarvis, G. & Najarian, B. (1993). Detachment and coping: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring coping strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 619–626. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roger, D. & Najarian, B. (1998). The relationship between emotional rumination and cortisol secretion under stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 531–538. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1–2. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000001 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sexton, K. A. & Dugas, M. J. (2008). The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire: Validation of the English translation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 355–370. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sica, C., Novara, C., Dorz, S. & Sanavio, E. (1997). Coping strategies: Evidence for cross-cultural differences? A preliminary study with the Italian version of Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE). Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1025–1029. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spector, P. E. & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spector, P. E., Zhou, Z. E. & Yang, L. (2012). A longitudinal study relating workplace abuse to physical and psychological strains, Paper presented at the Southern Management Association Conference, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, October 30–November 3, 2010. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steed, L. G. (1998). A critique of coping scales. Australian Psychologist, 33, 193–202. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suls, J. & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 4, 249–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomsen, D. K., Mehlsen, M. Y., Hokland, M., Viidik, A., Olesen, F., Avlund, K., … Zachariae, R. (2004). Negative thoughts and health: Associations among rumination, immunity, and health care utilization in a young and elderly sample. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 363–371. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R. & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar