Skip to main content
Original Article

Investigating Construct Validity of the Cyber-Peer Experiences Questionnaire

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000457

Abstract. Cyberaggression and cybervictimization have gained momentum as a research focus given associated mental health sequelae. To date, however, there remains little consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of these constructs. The purpose of this study was to explore construct validity evidence for the Cyber-Peer Experiences Questionnaire (C-PEQ), a novel measure that assesses experiences of cyberaggression and cybervictimization. Undergraduate participants (n = 735) completed an online survey including the C-PEQ and other theoretically related instruments. Confirmatory factor analysis did not provide support for the hypothesized two-factor model [MLM χ2(125) = 293.58, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .87, SRMR = .06]. The C-PEQ displayed evidence for internal consistency reliability. Evidence for convergent validity with theoretically similar constructs was mixed. Specific areas of model misspecification included items 1 and 2 on both subscales (altering social media friend lists). Future research may explore additional construct validity evidence of the C-PEQ in novel samples with these items removed.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. text rev.). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00616.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., … Zukauskiene, R. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34, 575–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479697 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, S. F., & La Greca, A. M. (2016). Cyber victimization and aggression: Are they linked with adolescent smoking and drinking? Child & Youth Care Forum, 45, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9318-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Los Reyes, A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004). Applying depression-distortion hypotheses to the assessment of peer victimization in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3302_14 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of Internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341260 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents. Assessment, 13, 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106287354 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frick, P. J. (2004). The inventory of callous-unemotional traits. Unpublished rating scale. Retrieved from http://labs.uno.edu/developmental-psychopathology/ICU.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herge, W. M., La Greca, A. M., & Chan, S. F. (2016). Adolescent peer victimization and physical health problems. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 41, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsv050 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kimonis, E. R., Branch, J., Hagman, B., Graham, N., & Miller, C. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits in an undergraduate sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kokkinos, C. M., & Panayiotou, G. (2004). Predicting bullying and victimization among early adolescents: Associations with disruptive behavior disorders. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20055 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landoll, R. R., La Greca, A. M., & Lai, B. S. (2013). Aversive peer experiences on social networking sites: Development of the Social Networking‐Peer Experiences Questionnaire (SN‐PEQ). Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landoll, R. R., La Greca, A. M., Lai, B. S., Chan, S. F., & Herge, W. M. (2015). Cyber victimization by peers: Prospective associations with adolescent social anxiety and depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 42, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000414022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35, 293–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Calussi, P. (2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morales, J. R., & Crick, N. R. (1998). Self-report measure of aggression and victimization. University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus. Unpublished measure. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schenk, A. M., & Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.630310 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schenk, A. M., Fremouw, W. J., & Keelan, C. M. (2013). Characteristics of college cyberbullies. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2320–2327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stern, L. A., & Taylor, K. (2007). Social networking on Facebook. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 20, 9–20. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dam, N. T., & Earleywine, M. (2011). Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale – Revised (CESD-R): Pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 186, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Booth, T., & Bensch, D. (2013). Getting entangled in the nomological net. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000173 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar