Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Offender Subtypes Based on Psychopathic Traits

Results From Factor-Mixture Modeling

Published Online:April 29, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000582

Abstract

Abstract. Psychopathy is a primary risk factor of re-offending in sexual offenders. Conceptually, both variable-centered (e.g., factor analysis) and clustering methods (e.g., latent profile analysis) have been used in previous research. Variable-centered and clustering methods were merged in a simultaneous modeling strategy for two purposes: First, to test assumptions on the emergence of psychopathic versus sociopathic (antisocial) sub-groups. And second to compare the predictive validity of clusters with that afforded by a dimensional cut-score. Using mixture modeling, two types of models were estimated: Latent class factor-analytic (LCFA) and factor-mixture models (FMM). The four-factor model of psychopathy as assessed with the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) was estimated for up to 12 latent classes in a sample of adult male sexual offenders from Austria (N = 1,266). Solutions with five (LCFA) and two latent classes (FMM) provided a good and parsimonious fit for the data. The two-latent-class FMM solution yielded higher predictive validity than a cut-score but only for general offense recidivism. Theoretically, this solution goes against etiological models that distinguish psychopathic from sociopathic (antisocial) individuals. Official data on offense recidivism (at a fixed 7-year-interval post-release) corroborate the importance of psychopathic offender subtypes. The rates of recidivism varied considerably between the subgroups.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Benning, S. D., Venables, N. C., & Hall, J. R. (2018). Successful psychopathy. In C. J. PatrickEd., Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 585–610). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Book, A. S., & Quinsey, V. L. (2003). Psychopaths: Cheaters or warrior hawks? Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00049-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bundeskanzleramt. (Eds.). (2017). Bundesrecht konsolidiert: Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für Datenschutzgesetz 2000, Fassung vom 14.07.2017 [Federal law consolidated: Total legislation for the data protection act 2000, version of July 14, 2017]. Retrieved from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10001597 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, K., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824786 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coid, J., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Antisocial personality disorder is on a continuum with psychopathy. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.01.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2014). Psychopathy, DSM-5, and a caution. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000078 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dietterich, T. G. (1998). Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10, 1895–1923. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017197 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guay, J.-P., Ruscio, J., Knight, R. A., & Hare, R. D. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: Evidence for dimensionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.701 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions. In C. J. PatrickEd., Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 39–79). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harpending, H., & Sobus, J. (1987). Sociopathy as an adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8(Supplement), 63S–72S. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(87)90019-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herpertz, S. C., & Sass, H. (2000). Emotional deficiency and psychopathy. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(200010)18:5<567::AID-BSL410>3.0.CO;2-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hicks, B. M., Clark, D. A., & Durbin, C. E. (2017). Person-centered approaches in the study of personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000212 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hicks, B. M., & Drislane, L. E. (2018). Variants (“subtypes”) of psychopathy. In C. J. PatrickEd., Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 297–332). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krstic, S., Neumann, C. S., Roy, S., Robertson, C. A., Knight, R. A., & Hare, R. D. (2018). Using latent variable- and person-centered approaches to examine the role of psychopathic traits in sex offenders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000249 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lieli, R. P., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2019). Using the area under an estimated ROC curve to test the adequacy of binary predictors. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 31, 100–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10485252.2018.1537440 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Masyn, K. E., Henderson, C. E., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2010). Exploring the latent structures of psychological constructs in social development using the dimensional–categorical spectrum. Social Development, 19, 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00573.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mealey, L. (1995). Primary sociopathy (psychopathy) is a type, secondary is not. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00040024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Lamkin, J., Maples-Keller, J. L., Sleep, C. E., & Lynam, D. R. (2018). A test of the empirical profile and coherence of the DSM-5 psychopathy specifier. Psychological Assessment, 30, 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000536 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mokros, A., Habermeyer, E., Neumann, C. S., Schilling, F., Hare, R. D., & Eher, R. (2014). Assessment of psychopathy in Austria: Psychometric properties of the Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000177 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Mokros, A., Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., Santtila, P., Habermeyer, E., & Nitschke, J. (2015). Variants of psychopathy in adult male offenders: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000042 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mokros, A., Stadtland, C., Osterheider, M., & Nedopil, N. (2010). Assessment of risk for violent recidivism through multivariate Bayesian classification. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 418–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021312 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125, 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Pardini, D. A. (2015). Antisociality and the construct of psychopathy: Data from across the globe. Journal of Personality, 83, 678–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12127 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S., Vitacco, M. J., & Mokros, A. (2016). Using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches to understanding psychopathic personality. In C. B. GaconoEd., The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide (2nd ed., pp. 14–31). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olver, M. E., Sewall, L. A., Sarty, G. E., Lewis, K., & Wong, S. C. P. (2015). A cluster analytic examination and external validation of psychopathic offender subtypes in a multisite sample of Canadian federal offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000038 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547737 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rettenberger, M., & Eher, R. (2007). Predicting reoffence in sexual offender subtypes: A prospective validation study of the German version of the Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Sexual Offender Treatment, 2(2), 4. Retrieved from. http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=62&type=123 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ruscio, J. P. (2007). Taxometric analysis: An empirically grounded approach to implementing the method. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1588–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807307027 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31, 1428–1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000623 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2012). Factor analysis with categorial indicators: A comparison between traditional and latent class approaches. In L. A. van der ArkM. A. CroonK. SijtsmaEds., New development in categorical data analysis for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 41–62). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walters, G. D., Knight, R. A., Grann, M., & Dahle, K.-P. (2008). Incremental validity of the Psychopathy Checklist facet scores: Predicting release outcome in six samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.396 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weiss, B., Crowe, M. L., Harris, A. M., Carter, N. T., Lynam, D. R., Watts, A. L., … Miller, J. D. (2019). Examining hypothesized interactive and curvilinear relations between psychopathic traits and externalizing problems in an offender sample using item response-based analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128, 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000462 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wendt, L. P., Wright, A. G. C., Pilkonis, P. A., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., Montague, P.R., … Zimmermann, J. (2019). The latent structure of interpersonal problems: Validity of dimensional, categorical, and hybrid models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128, 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000460 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Widiger, T. A., Cadoret, R., Hare, R., Robins, L., Rutherford, M., Zanarini, M., … Frances, A. (1996). DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zweig, M. H., & Campbell, G. (1993). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 39, 561–577. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar