Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Self-Concept and Identity Measure in Adolescents

Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Associations with Identity, Personality Traits, and Borderline Personality Features

Published Online:March 02, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000623

Abstract

Abstract. Identity difficulties have been associated with various psychiatric conditions and are considered a central issue in personality pathology. Following the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, measures of self- and interpersonal functioning have been developed. Although these measures were intended to be separate ratings of self-other deficits, only a global rating was obtained. Moreover, these measures fall short in bridging the gap between developmental and clinical identity work. To capture both adaptive and disturbed identity dimensions, Kaufman et al. (2015) developed the Self-Concept and Identity Measure (SCIM) that assesses consolidated identity, disturbed identity, and lack of identity. Using two-wave longitudinal data (2,150 adolescents; 54.2% girls; age range = 12–19), this study investigated the factor structure and reliability of the Dutch SCIM, its measurement invariance across time, its longitudinal measurement invariance across gender and age groups, and associations of the SCIM with identity synthesis and confusion, Big-Five personality traits, and borderline personality disorder features. Consolidated identity scores were positively related to identity synthesis and adaptive Big-Five traits, whereas negatively related to identity confusion, neuroticism, and borderline features. Opposite associations were obtained for disturbed identity and lack of identity scores. The Dutch SCIM appeared to produce valid and reliable scores and seemed suited to assess longitudinal identity functioning in Belgian adolescents.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bastiaansen, L., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G., Schotte, C., & Hofmans, J. (2013). Personality disorder dysfunction versus traits: Structural and conceptual issues. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becht, A. I., Nelemans, S. A., Branje, S. J. T., Vollebergh, W. A. M., Koot, H. M., Denissen, J. J. A., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2016). The quest for identity in adolescence: Heterogeneity in daily identity formation and psychosocial adjustment across 5 years. Developmental Psychology, 52, 2010–2021. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bogaerts, A., Claes, L., Schwartz, S. J., Becht, A. I., Verschueren, M., Gandhi, A., & Luyckx, K. (2019). Identity structure and processes in adolescence: Examining the directionality of between- and within-person associations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(5), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0931-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bogaerts, A., Claes, L., Verschueren, M., Bastiaens, T., Kaufman, E. A., Smits, D., & Luyckx, K. (2018). The Dutch Self-Concept and Identity Measure (SCIM): Factor structure and associations with identity dimensions and psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bogaerts, A., Luyckx, K., Bastiaens, T., Kaufman, E. A., & Claes, L. (2020). Identity impairment as a central dimension in personality pathology. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09804-9 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buelens, T., Luyckx, K., Kiekens, G., Gandhi, A., Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Claes, L. (2020). Investigating the DSM-5 criteria for non-suicidal self-injury disorder in a community sample of adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cruitt, P. J., Boudreaux, M. J., King, H. R., Oltmanns, J. R., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2019). Examining Criterion A: DSM-5 level of personality functioning as assessed through Life Story Interviews. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000321 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis, Norton. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gandhi, A., Claes, L., Bosmans, G., Baetens, I., Wilderjans, T., Maitra, S., Kiekens, G., & Luyckx, K. (2016). Non-suicidal self-injury and adolescents attachment with peers and mother: The mediating role of identity synthesis and confusion. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0350-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gerlitz, J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP [To assess the Big-Five personality traits in the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) survey]. DIW Research Notes. (Vol. 4). DIW Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jakobsen, J. C., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J., & Winkel, P. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaufman, E. A., Cundiff, J. M., & Crowell, S. E. (2015). The development, factor structure, and validation of the Self-Concept and Identity Measure (SCIM): A self-report assessment of clinical identity disturbance. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9441-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaufman, E. A., Puzia, M. E., Crowell, S. E., & Price, C. J. (2019). Replication of the Self-Concept and Identity Measure (SCIM) among a treatment-seeking sample. Identity, 19, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2019.1566068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klimstra, T. A., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2017). A theoretical framework for the associations between identity and psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 53, 2052–2065. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000356 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). Identity formation in adolescence: Change or stability? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9401-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Branje, S., Teppers, E., Goossens, L., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2013). Personality traits, interpersonal identity, and relationship stability: Longitudinal linkages in late adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1661–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9862-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Luyckx, K., Klimstra, T. A., Duriez, B., Van Petegem, S., & Beyers, W. (2013). Personal identity processes from adolescence through the late 20s: Age trends, functionality, and depressive symptoms. Social Development, 22, 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12027 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Luyckx, K., Teppers, E., Klimstra, T. A., & Rassart, J. (2014). Identity processes and personality traits and types in adolescence: Directionality of effects and developmental trajectories. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2144–2153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037256 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2013). Factorial invariance in multiple populations: A multiple testing procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412451978 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal, D. A., Gurney, R. M., & Moore, S. M. (1981). From trust to intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10, 525–537. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. (2002). Missing data: Our view to the state of art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Wang, W., & Olthuis, J. V. (2009). Measuring identity from an Eriksonian perspective: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sharp, C., Steinberg, L., Temple, J., & Newlin, E. (2014). An 11-item measure to assess borderline traits in adolescents: Refinement of the BPFSC using IRT. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000057 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Doeselaar, L., Becht, A. I., Klimstra, T. A., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2018). A review and integration of three key components of identity development: Distinctiveness, coherence, and continuity. European Psychologist, 23, 278–288. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Westen, D., Betan, E., & Defife, J. A. (2011). Identity disturbance in adolescence: Associations with borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000817 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar