Skip to main content
Original Article

Validity of the Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire in a Community Sample

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000635

Abstract. The Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire (PSSQ) is a new scale assessing the experience of stigma in those who have been suicidal. This study examined the construct validity of the scale using a sample of participants from the general community who reported being suicidal at some point in their lives (N = 3,947). The Distress Questionnaire – 5 and the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale were used to assess the severity of distress and suicidality. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed a three-factor model (Rejection, Minimization, Self-Blame) with one general Personal Stigma factor influencing the three first-order factors, which best fit the data. Scalar invariance was reached for both age and gender. The same factor structure was maintained when the format of the scale was altered for a subsample to provide a “not applicable” option for each item. PSSQ total score remained a significant predictor of distress after suicidality and demographic variables were accounted for. The PSSQ and its subscales can be used for the assessment of personal suicide stigma.

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). 2016 census community profiles. https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/communityprofile/1?opendocument First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., & Christensen, H. (2013). The Stigma of Suicide Scale: Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide. Crisis, 34(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000156 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Batterham, P. J., Sunderland, M., Carragher, N., Calear, A. L., Mackinnon, A. J., & Slade, T. (2016). The Distress Questionnaire – 5: Population screener for psychological distress was more accurate than the K6/K10. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 71, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brohan, E., Slade, M., Clement, S., & Thornicroft, G. (2010). Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: A review of measures. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-80 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corrigan, P. W., Kerr, A., & Knudsen, L. (2005). The stigma of mental illness: Explanatory models and methods for change. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 11(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2005.07.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corrigan, P. W., Sheehan, L., Al-Khouja, M. A. & The Stigma of Suicide Research Team. (2017). Making sense of the public stigma of suicide: Factor analyses of its stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminations. Crisis, 38(5), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000456 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., & Barr, L. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(8), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • IASP. (2013). Stigma: A major barrier to suicide prevention. https://www.iasp.info/resources/detail/stigma-a-major-barrier-to-suicide-prevention-1470.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LeBel, T. P. (2008). Perceptions of and responses to stigma. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00081.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678626 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Livingston, J. D., & Boyd, J. E. (2010). Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2150–2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). McGraw Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Osman, A., Bagge, C. L., Gutierrez, P. M., Konick, L. C., Kopper, B. A., & Barrios, F. X. (2001). The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire – Revised (SBQ-R): Validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment, 8(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110100800409 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modelling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W. (2008). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (R package version 1.0–51). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W., Dworak, E. M., & Condon, D. M. (2021). Exploring the persome: The power of the item in understanding personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, Article 109905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109905 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rimkeviciene, J., Hawgood, J., O’Gorman, J., & De Leo, D. (2015). Personal stigma in suicide attempters. Death Studies, 39(10), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2015.1037972 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rimkeviciene, J., O’Gorman, J., Hawgood, J., & De Leo, D. (2019). Development and validity of the Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire (PSSQ): A new tool to assess stigmatization among those who are suicidal. Crisis, 40(5), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000567 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, Psychology Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scocco, P., Castriotta, C., Toffol, E., & Preti, A. (2012). Stigma of Suicide Attempt (STOSA) scale and Stigma of Suicide and Suicide Survivor (STOSASS) scale: Two new assessment tools. Psychiatry Research, 200(2–3), 872–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.033 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scocco, P., Toffol, E., & Preti, A. (2016). Psychological distress increases perceived stigma toward attempted suicide among those with a history of past attempted suicide. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000457 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheehan, L., Dubke, R., & Corrigan, P. W. (2017). The specificity of public stigma: A comparison of suicide and depression-related stigma. Psychiatry Research, 256, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skruibis, P., Geležėlytė, O., & Dadašev, S. (2015). The stigma of suicidal behaviour. In D. GailienėEd., Lithuanian faces after transition. Psychological consequences of cultural trauma (pp. 217–233). Eugrimas Publishing House. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Spijker, B. A. J., Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., Farrer, L., Christensen, H., Reynolds, J., & Kerkhof, A. J. F. M. (2014). The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS): Community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(4), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12084 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, M. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, C., Cero, I., Gauthier, J. M., & Witte, T. K. (2018). Examination of the latent factor structure and construct validity of the stigma of Suicide Scale – Short Form. Death Studies, 42(10), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1416431 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 409–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar