Evolutions in Testing Research

References

• Boudrias, J.-S., Bernaud, J.-L., & Plunier, P. (2014). Candidates’ integration of individual psychological assessment feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2012-0016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Condon, D. M., Wood, D., Mõttus, R., Booth, T., Costantini, G., Greiff, S., Johnson, W., Lukaszewski, A., Murray, A., Revelle, W., Wright, A. G. C., Ziegler, M., & Zimmermann, J. (2020). Bottom up construction of a personality taxonomy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(6), 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000626 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Foster, D. (2014, July). Using technology in assessment. Presented at the 9th Conference of the International Test Commission, San Sebastian, Spain. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Greiff, S. (2017). The field of psychological assessment: Where it stands and where it’s going – A personal analysis of foci, gaps, and implications for EJPA. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000412 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Greiff, S., & Heene, M. (2017). Why psychological assessment needs to start worrying about model fit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33, 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000450 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Greiff, S., & Iliescu, D. (2017). A test is much more than just the test itself: Some thoughts on adaptation and equivalence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000428 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Iliescu, D. (2017). Adapting tests in linguistic and cultural situations, Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kane, M. (2010). Validity and fairness. Language Testing, 27(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349467 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kane, M. (2016). Validity as the evaluation of the claims based on test scores. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1156645 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• König, C. J., Demetriou, A. M., Glock, P., Hiemstra, A. M. F., Iliescu, D., Ionescu, C., Langer, M., Liem, C., Linnenbürger, A., Siegel, R., & Vartholomaios, I. (2020). Some advice for psychologists who want to work with computer scientists on big data. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 6(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.25035/pad.2020.01.002 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Mastoras, S. M., Climie, E. A., McCrimmon, A. W., & Schwean, V. L. (2011). A CLEAR approach to report writing: A framework for improving the efficacy of psychoeducational reports. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573511409722 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Miller, J. A., & Watkins, M. W. (2010). The use of graphs to communicate psychoeducational test results to parents. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377900903175911 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Mõttus, R., Wood, D., Condon, D. M., Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Greiff, S., Johnson, W., Lukaszewski, A., Murray, A., Revelle, W., Wright, A. G. C., Yarkoni, T., Ziegler, M., & Zimmermann, J. (2020). Descriptive, predictive and explanatory personality research: Different goals, different approaches, but a shared need to move beyond the Big Few traits. European Journal of Personality, 34(6), 1175–1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2311 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Wiener, J., & Costaris, L. (2012). Teaching psychological report writing: Content and process. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573511418484 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar