Restoring the Spirit of Fair Play in the Debate About Violent Video Games
A Comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013)
Abstract
This commentary argues that, rather than providing an “exhaustive review,” Elson and Ferguson (2013) discuss a selective sample of empirical studies on violent video game use which corroborate their claim that there is no systematic evidence for a link between violent video game play and aggression. In evaluating the evidence, the authors portray a biased picture of the current state of knowledge about media violence effects. They fail to distinguish between aggression and violence and between everyday and clinical forms of aggression. Furthermore, they misrepresent key constructs, such as mediation, moderation, and external validity, to discredit methodologies used to assess aggression and media violence use. The paper moves the debate backward rather than forward, falling behind existing meta-analytic studies that consider a much wider and more balanced range of studies.
References
(1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1, 19–41.
(2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151–173.
(1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In , The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1, (pp. 99–142). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
(1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
(1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37, 245–257.
(2013). Testing the reliability and validity of different measures of violent video game use in the USA, Singapore, and Germany. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000004
(2013). Twenty-five years of research on violence in digital games and aggression: Empirical evidence, perspectives and a debate gone astray. European Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1016–9040/a000147
(2009). The public health risks of media violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Pediatrics, 154, 759–763.
(2012, May). Validity of adolescents’ direct estimates of their exposure to media violence in three types of media. Poster presented at the 62nd Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Phoenix, AZ.
(2010). Media violence and the self: The impact of personalized gaming characters in aggressive video games on aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 192–195.
(2008). Further evidence for the validity of the Taylor aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 214–229.
(2013). The social psychology of aggression (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
(2012). Media violence use and aggression among German adolescents: Associations and trajectories of change in a three-wave longitudinal study. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 152–166.
(2007). Social information processing, experiences of aggression in social contexts, and aggressive behavior in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 330–347.
(2009). Exposure to violent video games and aggression in German adolescents: A longitudinal analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 75–89.
(2011). Preference for violent electronic games and aggressive behavior among children: The beginning of the downward spiral? Media Psychology, 14, 233–258.
