Dualistic and Trichotomic Approaches in Psychological Enquiry
The Question About Body, Soul, and Spirit
Abstract
Abstract. While the trichotomy of body, soul, and spirit has been part of different folk-psychological and contemplative traditions over the millennia, more recently these concepts have ceded to a dualistic approach by which the physical world is distinguished from a more broadly conceptualized mental realm. In the current paper, we propose a renewed trichotomic distinction on the basis of epistemological considerations about the nature of thinking – which we will apply to the question about the “true self” as a paradigmatic case-study. We differentiate between a representational and an immersive type of thinking – a distinction which we argue can help illuminate facets of the (true) self that remain elusive to a dualistic perspective. We sketch a roadmap toward an empirical enquiry of the self on the basis of a trichotomic distinction and discuss implications of this approach for the study of psychological phenomena in more general terms.
References
(2006). Analytical Buddhism: The two-tiered illusion of self, Palgrave.
(2013). Social psychology and human nature, Cengage Learning.
(2018). Toward a postmaterialist psychology: Theory, research, and applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.02.004
(2004). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x06009101
(1915/1930). Wahrheit und Evidenz. Erkenntnistheoretische Abhandlungen und Briefe
[Truth and evidence: Epistemological writings and letters]. Felix Meiner Verlag.2006 Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian metaphysics of experience, Routledge.
(2013). Spiritual needs among patients with chronic pain diseases and cancer living in a secular society. Pain Medicine, 14, 1362–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12198
(2011). I do not exist. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 189–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.006
(2015). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften
[Research methods and evaluation in den social and human sciences] . Springer.(2010).
“I am of the nature of seeing”: Phenomenological reflections on the Indian notion of witness-consciousness . In M. SideritsE. ThompsonD. ZahavirEds., Self, no-self? Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions (pp. 193–216). Oxford University Press.(2018). Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie: Eine systematische Rekonstruktion
[The 25 years of philosophy: A systematic reconstruction] . Kostermann – Rote Reihe.(2018). Denk-Erfahrung: Eine phänomenologisch orientierte Untersuchung der Erfahrbarkeit des Denkens und der Gedanken
[Thought-experience: A phenomenological enquiry into experiencing thinking and thoughts] . Verlag Karl Alber.(2012). Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen der Psychologie
[Epistemological foundations of psychology] . Springer.(2001). Komplementäre Methodenlehre der klinischen Forschung: Cognition-based Medicine
[Complementary methodology of clinical research: Cognition-based medicine] . Springer.(2010).
Enacting the self: Buddhist and enactivist approaches to the emergence of the self . In M. SideritsE. ThompsonD. ZahavirEds., Self, no self? Perspectives from analytical, phenomenological, and Indian traditions (pp. 239–273). Oxford University Press.(2009). The ego-tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self, Basic Books.
(2014). Triple-aspect monism: Physiological, mental unconscious and conscious aspects of brain activity. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 13(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219635214400068
(2008). Dualism revisited: Body vs. mind vs. soul. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 99–115.
(2015).
Did the Buddha have a self? No-self, self, and mindfulness in Buddhist thought and Western psychologies . In K. BrownD. CreswellR. RyanEds., Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 245–265). Guilford Press.(1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00111
(2018). Die Ich-bin Worte des Johannesevangeliums
[The I am words of the Gospel of John] . http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/imperia/md/content/nt/nt/dasjohannesevangelium/p-ich-bin.pdf(2019). The true self. Critique, nature, method. Frontiers in Psychology,
(1894). Die Philosophie der Freiheit
[The philosophy of freedom] . Steiner Verlag.(1918). Challenges of our time. Rudolf Steiner Verlag.
(2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), Article 1745691616689495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689495
(2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005
(2018). Outer and inner dimensions of brain and consciousness – Refining and integrating the phenomenal layers. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14, 167–185. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0248-2
(2017). Secular spirituality – what it is. Why we need it. How to proceed. Journal for the Study of Spirituality, 7, 7–20.
(2019). Avoiding “false alarms” and “misses” in psychological theory building: complementing the principle of parsimony with the principle of tentative affirmation. Psychological Reports, 123(3), 983–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119835760
(2014). The role of the brain during conscious experience: In search of a new metaphor. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(11–12), 111–129.
(2019). The self as activity. Review of General Psychology, 23(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000169
(2021). The self in the periphery. Review of General Psychology, 25(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020954372
(2016). Exploring the behavioral, experiential, and conceptual dimensions of the self: Introducing a new phenomenological approach. European Psychologist, 21, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000263
(2015a). The challenges and opportunities of first Person inquiry in experimental psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.09.001
(2015b). The behavioral, experiential and conceptual dimensions of psychological phenomena: Body, soul, and spirit. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.002
(2018a). Introspection in psychology: Its contribution to theory and method in memory research. European Psychologist, 23(3), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000296
(2018b). Researching mind wandering from a first person perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3406
(1988). Knowing more about what we can tell: “Introspective” access and causal report accuracy 10 years later. British Journal of Psychology, 79(1), 13–45.
(1983). Strukturphänomenologie: Vorbewusstes Gestaltbilden im erkennenden Wirklichkeitsenthüllen. Ein neues wissenschaftstheoretisches Konezpt im Anschluss an die Erkenntniswissenschaft Rudolf Steiners
[Strucutre phenomenology: Preconscious thinking – a new epistemological concept based on Rudolf Steiners philosophy] . Spicker, Gideon.(2014). Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame, Oxford University Press.
(2015). Self and other: From pure ego to co-constituted we. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(2), 143–160.
(2013). Dimensionen des Selbst. Eine philosophische Anthroposophie
[Dimensions of the self. A philosophical anthropology] . Edition Hardenberg. Verlag Freies Geistesleben.(2018). First person experiments in thinking. European Psychologist, 23(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000301
(2019). Exploring conceptual thinking and pure concepts from a first-person perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18, 947–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9593-8
