Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Articles

Cognitive Ability and Self-Reported Efficacy of Self-Presentation Predict Faking on Personality Measures

Published Online:January 01, 2005https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.26.4.194

Abstract

Abstract. The main aim of the present study was to investigate whether faking on personality measures is predicted by cognitive ability and self-reported efficacy of positive self-presentation (ESP) assessed under honest conditions. 123 participants completed the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and the self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM) scales of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Version 7 (BIDR) under four instructional sets: honest, fake bad, fake good, and two specifically formulated applicant instructions. In line with the assumption that personality measures lose their original meaning under the instruction to fake, it could be shown that the relationship between honest and faked NEO-FFI scales decreased with increasing situational pressure. In line with the hypothesis that faking reflects an ability, it could be demonstrated that general intelligence was related to the amount of faking, to the ability to perceive the situational requirements, and to the ability to fake in line with the situational requirements. In addition, self-reported ESP, but not SDE and IM, was positively related to positive self-presentation. Our findings imply that faking on personality measures should not only be seen as a threat to validity, but rather as a positive, adaptive, and probably predictive variable, which should be investigated in its own right.

References

  • Ackerman, P.L., Heggestad, E.D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alliger, G.M., Lilienfeld, S.O., Mitchell, K.E. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7, 32–39 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Austin, E.J., Deary, I.J., Whiteman, M.C., Fowkes, F.G.R., Pedersen, N.L., Rabbitt, P., Bent, N., McInnes, L. (2002). Relationships between ability and personality: Does intelligence contribute positively to personal and social adjustment?. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1391–1411 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Austin, E.J., Hofer, S.M., Deary, I.J., Eber, H.W. (2000). Interactions between intelligence and personality: Results from two large samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 405–427 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ballenger, J.F., Caldwell-Andrews, A., Baer, R.A. (2001). Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised in a clinical population. Psychological Assessment, 13, 254–260 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Judge, T.A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI). [NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caldwell-Andrews, A., Baer, R.A., Berry, D.T. R (2000). Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 472–488 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Collins, J.M., Gleaves, D.H. (1998). Race, job applicants, and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Implications for Black psychology, industrial/organizational psychology, and the Five-Factor Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 531– 544 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crowne, D.P. (1979). The experimental study of personality. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunlap, W.P., Cortina, J.M., Vaslow, J.B., Burke, M.J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellingson, J.E., Sackett, P.R., Hough, L.M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155–166 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elliot, A.G.P. (1981). Some implications of lie scale scores in real-life selection. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 9–16 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A. (1990). Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 9, 46–55 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Griffin, B., Keseth, B., Grayson, D. (2004). Applicants faking good: Evidence of item bias in the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1545–1558 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hogan, R., Shelton, D. (1998). A socioanalytic perspective on job performance. Human Performance, 11, 129–144 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hogan, R., Hogan, J., Roberts, B.W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469–477 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hough, L.M., Eaton, N.K., Dunnette, M.D., Kamp, J.D., McCloy, R.A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion of those validities [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 252– 259 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jäger, A.D., Althoff, K. (1994). Der Wilde-Intelligenz-Test (WIT). Ein Strukturdiagnostikum. [The Wilde-Intelligence Test (WIT). Assessment of the structure of intelligence]. Herausgegeben von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Personalwesen e.V. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kroger, R.O., Turnbull, W. (1975). Invalidity of validity scales: The case of the MMPI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 48–55 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mahar, D., Cologon, J., Duck, J. (1995). Response strategies when faking personality questionnaires in a vocational selection setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 605– 609 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marcus, B. (2003). Persönlichkeitstests in der Personalauswahl: Sind “sozial erwünschte” Antworten wirklich nicht wünschenswert. [Personality testing in personnel selection: Is “socially desirable” responding really not desirable]? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211, 138–148 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • McFarland, L.A., Ryan, A.M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812–821 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mersman, J.L., Shultz, K.S. (1998). Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 217–227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mielke, R. (1990). Ein Fragebogen zur Wirksamkeit der Selbstdarstellung. [Efficacy of self-presentation questionnaire] Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 21, 162–170 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montag, I., Levin, J. (1994). The five-factor personality model in applied settings. European Journal of Personality, 8, 1–11 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J.P. Robinson & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D.L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales: Manual of the Balanced Inventory of Social Desirable Responding (BIDR-7). Buffalo/Toronto: Multi-Health Systems First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D.L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H.I. Braun & D.N. Jackson (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D.L., John, O.P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pauls, C.A., Crost, N.W. (2005). Effects of different instructional sets on the construct validity of the NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 297–308 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pauls, C.A., Crost, N.W. (2004). Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1137–1151 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pauls, C.A., Stemmler, G. (2003). Substance and bias in social desirability responding. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 263–275 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosse, J.G., Stecher, M.D., Miller, J.L., Levin, R.A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634–644 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ruch, F.L., Ruch, W.W. (1967). The K factor as a (validity) suppressor variable in predicting success in selling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 201–204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sackeim, H.A., Gur, R.C. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness. In G.E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2, pp. 139-197). New York: Plenum First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmit, M.J., Ryan, A.M. (1993). The Big Five in organizational selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 699–974 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, D.B., Ellingson, J.E. (2002). Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 211–219 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, D.B., Hanges, P.J., Dickson, M.W. (2001). Personnel selection and the five-factor model: Reexamining the effects of applicant's frame of reference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 304–315 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O.S., Chan, K.Y., Lee, W.C., Drasgow, F. (2001). Effects of the testing situation on item responding: Cause for concern. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 943–953 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stöber, J., Dette, D.E., Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 370–389 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Topping, G.D., O'Gorman, J.G. (1997). Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 117–124 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zickar, M.J., Robie, C. (1999). Modeling faking good on personality items: An item-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 551–563 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar