Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

Looking at the Same Interaction and Seeing Something Different

The Role of Informational Contexts, Judgment Perspective, and Behavioral Coding on Judgment Accuracy

Published Online:May 11, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000257

Abstract

Abstract. The role of information context, judgment perspective and cue type on the “accuracy” of first impressions of another’s Big5 personality was studied in three phases of data collection (n = 173). Accurate judgments were defined as the level of agreement between a target person’s aggregated personality score (i.e., average of self and informant ratings of personality) and a personality judgement about the target, indexed using item correlations. Results for Phase 1 found that completing a different task with the same partner improved accuracy for conscientiousness. Phase 2 investigated the relationship between a person’s role (judgment perspective) within an interaction (interactants, observers) and showed that Observers were better at judging the less interpersonal traits of conscientiousness and openness relative to Interactants. Finally, Phase 3 examined the types of cues that people used when rating another’s personality. Although Observers and Interactants had access to the same interaction, analyses revealed that they employed different types of cues when judging others. Findings are discussed in terms of Funder’s Realistic Accuracy Model (1995, 1999) along with practical implications, limitations and suggestions for future research.

References

  • Adler, R. S., Rosen, B., & Silverstein, E. M. (1998). Emotions in negotiation: How to manage fear and anger. Negotiation Journal, 14, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024657321423 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Akert, R. M., & Panter, A. T. (1988). Extraversion and the ability to decode nonverbal communication. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 965–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(88)90130-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality. New York, NY: Holt, 173–181. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.518 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1998). Nonverbal communication. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 2, 775–782. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ames, D. R., & Bianchi, E. C. (2008). The agreeableness asymmetry in first impressions: Perceivers’ impulse to (mis)judge agreeableness and how it is moderated by power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1719–1736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323932 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. In J. P. ForgasJ. M. InnesEds., Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 189–203). North Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2016). Accuracy of judging personality. In J. A. HallM. Schmid MastT. V. WestEds., The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 1116–1122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). How extraverted is [email protected]? Inferring personality traits from email addresses. Journal of Research in Personality, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360756 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.715 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beer, A., & Brooks, C. (2011). Information quality in personality judgment: The value of personal disclosure. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beer, A., & Watson, D. (2010). The effects of information and exposure on self-other agreement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bernieri, F. J., Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1994). Measuring person perception accuracy: Another look at self-other agreement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294204004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berry, D. S., & Hansen, J. S. (2000). Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.119 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (1998). The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bonito, J., Burgoon, J. K., Ramirez, A. Jr., & Dunbar, N. E. (2000). Participation and decision-making: The role of interactivity in communication processes and outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00799.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing Observer and participant perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication, 56, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949109372822 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cairns, R., & Green, J. (1979). How to assess personality and social patterns: Observations or ratings?. In R. B. CairnsEd., The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues and illustrations (pp. 209–226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carney, D. R., Colvin, C. R., & Hall, J. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). The t test for means. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd. ed., pp. 20–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1959). Interpretation of reliability and validity coefficients: Remarks on a paper by Lord. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042848 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. A. (1997). Personality and empathic accuracy. In W. J. IckesEd., Empathic accuracy (pp. 144–168). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fraley, R. C., & Vazire, S. (2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PloS One, 9, e109019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Funder, D. C. (2001). Accuracy in personality judgment: Research and theory concerning an obvious question. In B. W. RobertsR. HoganEds., Personality Psychology in the Workplace. Decade of Behavior (pp. 121–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.149 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality, 60, 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.773 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Funder, D. C., & Sneed, C. D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.479 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funder, D. C., & West, S. G. (1993). Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 61, 457–467. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, D. T., Jones, E. E., & Pelham, B. W. (1987). Influence and inference: What the active perceiver overlooks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.861 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gill, A., & Oberlander, J. (2003). Perception of e-mail personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; neuroticism is a worry. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 456–461. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Giordano, G., George, J., Marett, K., & Keane, B. (2011). Reviewers and the detection of deceptive information in recorded interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 252–269. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holleran, S. E., Mehl, M. R., & Levitt, S. (2009). Eavesdropping on social life: The accuracy of stranger ratings of daily behavior from thin slices of natural conversations. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 660–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2012). Accuracy and assumed similarity in first impressions of personality: Differing associations at different levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, D. N., Neill, J. A., & Sevan, A. R. (1969). Interpersonal judgmental accuracy and bias as a function of degree of acquaintance. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 135–136. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x/full First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kumar, R. (1997). The role of affect in negotiations: An integrative overview. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886397331007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kwan, V. S., John, O. P., Kenny, D. A., Bond, M. H., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.94 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Letzring, T. D. (2005). Personality and behavioural correlates of accurate personality judgment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Letzring, T. D. (2008). The good judge of personality: Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886397331007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Letzring, T. D., Wells, S. M., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Quantity and quality of available information affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McLarney-Vesotski, A. R., Bernieri, F., & Rempala, D. (2006). Personality perception: A developmental study. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 652–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.07.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Naumann, L. P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2000). Understanding optimal outcomes. Human Communication Research, 26, 527–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00768.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.816 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Trapnell, P. D. (2008). Self-presentation on personality scales: An agency-communion framework. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality (pp. 493–517). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pronin, E., Fleming, J. J., & Steffel, M. (2008). Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012710 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reynolds, D. J., Jr., & Gifford, R. (2001). The sounds and sights of intelligence: A lens model channel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 187–200. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal, R. (1987). Judgment studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal, R., Blanck, P. D., & Vannicelli, M. (1984). Speaking to and about patients: Predicting therapists’ tone of voice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(4), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.679 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (1978). Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extroversion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. LindzeyE. AronsonEds., Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 883–948). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stafford, L., Waldron, V. R., & Infield, L. L. (1989). Actor‐Observer differences in conversational memory. Human Communication Research, 15, 590–611. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Taft, R. (1955). The ability to judge people. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044999 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thorne, A. (1987). The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 718–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.718 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vazire, S., Naumann, L. P., Rentfrow, J. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Portrait of a narcissist: Manifestation of narcissism in physical appearance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1439–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vogt, D. S., & Randall Colvin, C. (2003). Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgments. Journal of Personality, 71, 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7102005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wall, H. J., Taylor, P. J., & Campbell, C. (2016). Getting the balance right? A mismatch in interaction demands between target and judge impacts on judgement accuracy for some traits but not others. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.037 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wall, H. J., Taylor, P. J., Dixon, J., Conchie, S. M., & Ellis, D. A. (2013). Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy of personality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D. (1989). Strangers’ ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). Self-versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 927–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.927 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.546 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson Van Voorhis, C. R., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43–50. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wood, D., & Furr, R. M. (2016). The correlates of similarity estimates are often misleadingly positive: The nature and scope of the problem, and some solutions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315581119 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar